PDA

**See This Page With Full Graphics, Pictures and Color!** CLICK HERE --> : New Hampshire Plans To Tax IM, Chat Rooms


Stinkysteve
07-14-2004, 12:14 PM
Just what we all need, another hidden fee on our telephone bills!

Story here
http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=23900472

New Hampshire Plans To Tax IM, Chat Rooms

By InternetWeek.com


The New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration is proposing a 7 percent tax on Internet and telephone services. The tax would include chat rooms, Web mail, voice mail, and instant messaging.

The proposal adds specific references to Internet services under the New Hampshire's telecommunications tax. The current tax applies to two-way communications. State officials assert that extending the tax to encompass Internet services simply updates the tax to account for advances in technology.

The state telecommunications tax dates back to 1990. In an official statement, Department of Revenue spokesperson Val Berghaus said, "It's not the position of the department that it's applying the law to new things. Rather that it's clarifying that the law did apply to these things even though they were not expressly stated in 1990."

Speaking to USA Today, Carol Miller, president of the New Hampshire Internet Service Providers Association, claimed that the proposed tax would be a huge burden to providers, forcing them to separate Internet services from basic Internet connections.

"They have traditionally taxed the phone line service, the actual line," said Miller. "Now they are looking at taxing Web mail, chat, instant messaging, and wireless Internet. We think this is far beyond the scope of what the tax was meant for."

New Hampshire was one of approximately 12 states allowed to continue levying a state telecommunications services tax after approval of the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act in 1998. The six-year-old federal act imposes a temporary moratorium on taxing Internet access services. New Hampshire's tax on two-way telephone services, both wireless and land line service, as well as broadband and DSL Internet connection services predates the federal act.

The proposal is subject to a public hearing a state legislative committee must review it before approval. State Representative Michael Harrington opposes the new tax and stated that if the changes are approved by committee he will seek to overturn them by filing a bill.

Hoagie
07-14-2004, 12:17 PM
Before you know it they will be trying to tax face to face conversations. Another ridiculous tax.

fcuknu
07-15-2004, 03:35 PM
Next thing they will be doing is taxing the eating of muffins, I like muffins

ih8Uboo-boo
07-15-2004, 05:52 PM
Speaking to USA Today, Carol Miller, president of the New Hampshire Internet Service Providers Association, claimed that the proposed tax would be a huge burden to providers, forcing them to separate Internet services from basic Internet connections hmmm... I wonder if you get bounced around a bit then wind up talking to an air traffic controller if you try and call her???

RandomNY
07-15-2004, 05:53 PM
New Hampshire used to be anti-tax.. I mean they have no INCOME TAX or SALES TAX. What if somone only uses the WWW. Are they going to send the STATE TAX collector to check everyones computer for AIM or ICQ?

mascan42
07-15-2004, 06:07 PM
New Hampshire used to be anti-tax.. I mean they have no INCOME TAX or SALES TAX. What if somone only uses the WWW. Are they going to send the STATE TAX collector to check everyones computer for AIM or ICQ?That's what I was wondering . . . how are they going to know if and how much you're using those services unless they force your ISP to put spyware on your computer so they can track your internet usage? :icon_evil

Stinkysteve
07-15-2004, 09:33 PM
an update on the story
http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=23900780

New Hampshire Divided Over VoIP Taxes

By TechWeb News


With U.S. Senator John Sununu (R-N.H.) pushing for a vote by the U.S. Senate on his legislation that would block federal and state jurisdictions from taxing VoIP, there are moves back in his home state to do the opposite -- tax VoIP. http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=22104681



Sununu has asked the Senate Commerce Committee to vote next week on his legislation that would treat voice over Internet protocol as "an information service" and, as such, block taxes.



At the same time, a proposal (SEE FIRST POST) by New Hampshire's Department of Revenue Administration has been put forth to tax Internet and telephone service at the rate of seven percent. The department's proposal, however, is meeting fierce opposition this week from state legislators, as well as from Granite State ISP and telecommunications lobbying organizations.



The issue of taxing VoIP, in particular, has been hotly debated by legislators on the federal and state levels.



New Hampshire has a long tradition of not levying taxes -- it has neither income tax nor sales tax -- and, for instance, often criticizes neighboring Massachusetts by calling it "Taxachusetts." However, New Hampshire has been one of just 12 states already taxing VoIP, and it has continued to do so during the current debate.



Now Senator Sununu is carrying the debate to the U.S. Senate, while New Hampshire state legislators argue over the issue in Concord.

Smoke
07-18-2004, 07:45 PM
Live Free or Die - my ass!