PDA

**See This Page With Full Graphics, Pictures and Color!** CLICK HERE --> : New Bagle Slams, Then Slows


Stinkysteve
07-19-2004, 04:19 PM
Story here:
http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=23901968

New Bagle Slams, Then Slows

By Gregg Keizer, TechWeb News


A worm that analysts thought Thursday would rival MyDoom in its destructiveness began to peter out Friday.

Bagle.af or Bagle.ab -- the worm is dubbed with different names by different anti-virus firms -- is a typical variant in the Bagle family, said Oliver Friedrichs, the senior manager for Symantec's security response team.


The mass mailing worm, which includes its own SMTP engine to spread itself from infected PCs, gathered a head of steam late Thursday when it first hit the Internet, prompting most security vendors to bump up their threat levels.


"Bagle.ab appears to be spreading rapidly, outpacing the last several variants," Friedrichs said late Thursday afternoon. Symantec then raised its threat assessment from "2" to "3" in its five-point scale. McAfee did the same by tagging the worm as a "Medium" threat.


But by mid-day Friday, the newest Bagle's infection rate had plateaued and was heading down. "It's slowing down," said Friedrich. "There are a lot of factors that may have contributed to that, but it's impossible to tell for certain. One may be the increased use of heuristic-based anti-virus products."


Heuristic-based anti-virus engines use algorithms to spot potential worms and viruses by behavior, rather than rely simply on signatures that match a virus' characteristics. Most security vendors, including Symantec, have either deployed heuristic engines or are in the process of doing so.


"Although this Bagel never had the potential to rival Sasser, at first it looked like it was going to compare with MyDoom," said Friedrichs. "In the end, though, it's not going to come close."


Bagle.ab/af delivers its payload as an attachment -- the file can be a .zip compressed file, which many organizations let through the gateway -- tries to disrupt security software on the target PC, and also spreads via shared folders on the network.


But like most worms of late, the new Bagle doesn't seem to live only to spread. The worm opens a backdoor on the compromised machine -- TCP port 1080 -- and then notifies the hacker of its success by contacting 141 different Web sites in Germany. "It's essentially phoning home, informing the [worm's] originator that the machine is available. He's obviously harvesting a list of systems to build a large zombie network," said Friedrichs.


The Web sites that Bagle.ab/af contacts include the city of Aachen, the German edition of Lycos' Tripod hosting service, and Lufthansa, the German airline. The sites may have been compromised earlier so that the hacker could retrieve the information sent by infected PCs.


This variant sends data to more than twice as many sites as an earlier edition, proof that the author is serious about collecting systems, said Friedrichs. The most likely use for such a "bot" network is to send out spam, although they can also be used to launch wide-spread denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.


"All of these things continue to come together," said Friedrichs. "Hackers are building bot networks by blending automated tools and worms -- using worm tactics to get the tools out there -- to make a whole new caliber of threats."


Bagel, which first appeared in January, spewed more than two dozen variants in a matter of weeks as it battled the writer of the Netsky worm for bragging rights. For more than two months, however, no new Bagles appeared. Two weeks ago, however, several versions http://www.securitypipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=22103885 that included the worm's source code rolled onto the Net.


Then, experts thought that the hacker responsible for Bagle has coming up for air after the arrest of a suspect -- Sven Jaschan, a teenager from northwest Germany -- in the Netsky case sent him underground.


Friday, analysts noted that the newest variant is just more proof that Bagle is back.


"Since Jaschan's arrest, the German virus writing community has pretty much gone to ground, with only a few low-impact viruses emerging," said Graham Cluley, a senior technology consultant with Sophos, in a statement. "Bagle.af's bold appearance may signal that German virus writers have not been put off. With luck their new-found confidence will be their downfall."


Original thread here:
http://www.wackbag.com/showthread.php?t=13709

Rob
07-19-2004, 06:36 PM
ahahahaha... "the bagle family"...

Stinkysteve
07-21-2004, 08:40 AM
Update here:
http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=23902558

By Gregg Keizer, TechWeb News


The latest Bagle three-worm wave includes one that's using a more aggressive twist on an old tactic, said security firms Tuesday.


Of the trio of Bagle variants that have hit the Internet since Saturday -- that day's Bagle.ag, Sunday's Bagle.ah. and Monday's Bagle.ai -- the worst is the also the most recent, said Patrick Hinojosa, the chief technology officer for Panda Software.


"When we saw it appear yesterday, it just sort of took off," Hinojosa said. As of mid-day Tuesday, it was the second-most prevalent worm on Panda's real-time list.


Bagle.ai -- with the parade of Bagle variants, it's no surprise that not all vendors are in sync with the name; Panda, for instance, dubbed it Bagle.ah -- is very similar to earlier iterations. It's a mass mailing worm that spreads by hijacking addresses on infected machines or through shared folders; packages its payload as a file attachment, including .zip compressed files; and attempts to contact a slew of German Web sites, probably to alert the hacker of compromised systems so they can be used later as spam proxies or to conduct denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.


Hinojosa notes one important difference that he thinks is behind Bagle.ai's success.


"It comes in and takes out a whole list of anti-virus and firewall processes," he said. "This list is larger than earlier [lists], and is so big I can't even count them. Someone really took their time to build this."


The list -- 288 by Symantec's count -- is used by Bagle.ai to terminate memory-resident and active anti-virus and firewall software in an attempt to slip through a computer's defenses. "It goes around [defenses] by deleting the processes," said Hinojosa. "That's not good."


If a PC is infected with Bagle.ai and the anti-virus software is terminated, the machine is not only open to other attacks, but it won't automatically update itself to new threats; that lets even protected machines continue to spread the worm.


Bottom line, said Hinojosa, is that the tactic shrinks the response window of anti-virus firms. "Even our average response time of 2.2 hours [from detection to coming up with a new signature] is too big a window," he said. "This shrinking of the response window let [Bagle.ai] slip into a larger than usual number of PCs."


Other analysts aren't so sure that Bagle.ai's process termination list is the real problem. Joe Telafici, the director of operations for McAfee's virus response team, noted that the three most recent Bagles all share the same basic list.


But he agreed that Bagle.ai is particularly nasty. "It's about twice as aggressive as other recent versions. We don't know exactly why, but I suspect it was initially spammed wide enough to catch a bigger audience."


Numbers from other security firms bear that out. MessageLabs, for instance, intercepted 15,000 copies of the worm in a 45-minute period Monday, evidence that it was spam seeded to a large number of users.


Since the source code http://www.securitypipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=22103885 for Bagle has been made public -- even included in some versions of the worm -- it's hard to tell if the latest outbreaks are from the original author(s) or new hackers just doing a bit of tweaking and fine-tuning.


McAfee's Telafici thinks the three newest Bagles were created by the same individual or group, but wouldn't hazard a guess as to whether it was the original Bagle author. Panda's Hinojosa went a bit farther on the limb. "What with some of the similarities in the internals, I think it could be some of the same guys [as originally]," he said.


The first Bagle worm appeared in January, and spawned more than two dozen variants in a matter of weeks. Then it disappeared off the radar. Some experts believe that the break was due to the author(s) lying low after the arrest of a suspect in the Netsky and Sasser worm breakouts. Hinojosa, however, has a more irreverent reason.


"It seems the virus writers' union requires a certain amount of time off during the summer."


Joking aside, Hinojosa and others recommended that users update their anti-virus signature files, then do a system scan. Tools are available online for detecting and cleaning PCs of the newest Bagle variations, including one that can be downloaded free of charge from the Symantec Web site. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.beagle@mm.removal.tool.html