PDA

**See This Page With Full Graphics, Pictures and Color!** CLICK HERE --> : Italy court makes impotent ex-husband pay damages


mainliner
05-12-2005, 02:21 PM
Italy court makes impotent ex-husband pay damages



ROME (Reuters) - An impotent Italian man who kept his problem a secret from his wife until after their wedding must pay her damages for 'eroding' her right to have a family, Italy's Supreme Court has ruled.



The woman, identified by the Italian media as Cristina S., was quick to get her marriage annulled in the 1990s after learning to her horror that her husband could not consummate it.



She then demanded damages, saying she had been robbed of her "right to sexuality" and the promise of a family. Despite losing legal battles in lower courts, she kept appealing, and finally the Supreme Court found in her favour.



"Her fundamental right (was) eroded to fully realise a family, as a woman and a wife, and eventually as a mother," according to excerpts from the court ruling published in Italian newspapers on Thursday.

The amount of damages will be settled by a lower court in Sicily, where the unhappy couple were married.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050512/80/finhg.html

Smoke
05-12-2005, 03:22 PM
An impotent Italian man who kept his problem a secret from his wife until after their wedding must pay her damages for 'eroding' her right to have a family, Italy's Supreme Court has ruled.

The woman, identified by the Italian media as Cristina S., was quick to get her marriage annulled in the 1990s after learning to her horror that her husband could not consummate it.

She then demanded damages, saying she had been robbed of her "right to sexuality" and the promise of a family. Despite losing legal battles in lower courts, she kept appealing, and finally the Supreme Court found in her favour.

I'd like to thank her for making the "try before you buy" argument.

If she had it annulled so quickly why did she spend a decade in every court she could get access to? What about the right of the guy to move forward? She's robbed of herself of her "right to sexuality" by spending all this time being a bitch, and let's face it, what guy is going to want to get next to her if she's so obcessed with this? It must be all about the money.

Besides, if it was annulled, doesn't that mean it didn't actually happen and therefor there should be no damages for it?