PDA

**See This Page With Full Graphics, Pictures and Color!** CLICK HERE --> : Michael Ross Executed


SOS
05-14-2005, 12:07 AM
New England Execution (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/05/14/wdeath14.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/05/14/ixworld.html)

This is a good thing.

New England has its first execution for nearly 50 years
By Alec Russell in Washington
(Filed: 14/05/2005)

A serial killer was put to death in Connecticut yesterday in the first execution in New England, America's liberal heartland, for nearly half a century.

Michael Ross, who ***** and strangled eight women in the 1980s, was injected with lethal chemicals early in the morning after he fought off attempts by his family and death penalty opponents to save his life.

In his final hours he had with him a Bible and a book of Bible quotations, and had a coffee and some sweets.

He declined to make a final statement before he was executed in the presence of prison officials, journalists and relatives of some of his victims, a prison spokesman said.

His execution at the Osborn Correctional Institution in Somers was the first in the six north-eastern New England states since 1960, when a convicted murderer, Joseph "Mad Dog" Taborsky, went to the electric chair. Only two of the six states, Connecticut and New Hampshire, have the death penalty. New Hampshire has not executed anyone since 1939 and does not have anyone on death row.

Ross, 45, had been on death row for 18 years after his conviction for the murders of four young women and girls in Connecticut in the early 1980s. He later confessed to the murders of four more women in Connecticut and neighbouring New York state.

His family sought a last-minute injunction to stop the execution, arguing diminished responsibility.

But they were turned down by the courts after Ross said last autumn that he was abandoning all appeals because his victims' families had suffered enough.

Several hundred opponents of the death penalty held a vigil outside the prison. Josh Rubenstein, the regional director for Amnesty International, said it was a "sad and unnecessary event".

Edwin Shelley, the father of one of his victims, killed in 1984, said: "We have waited 21 years for justice."

Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 there have been 964 executions in America, mainly in southern states.

giant pop tart
05-14-2005, 12:25 AM
Good stuff... they all deserve to die.

I was dating this girl who is a bit of a social activist. One day she was saying that she wanted to be outside of a prison for an execution. Much to her suprise, I said I would enjoy that too. When she questioned me, I told her it was because I'd get all of my friends, the grill, a keg, TV, Dish etc and countdown till the bastard died.

Needless to say, she wasn't happy.

Also needless to say, Its 12:30 on a friday night and I'm posting on Wackbag instead of being in the company of the afforementioned girlfriend.

Oh well, I like the death penalty, cheep beer, and tailgating, and she likes human rights, fancy wine, and theater.

SOS
05-14-2005, 12:42 AM
Tis better to tell the truth and get on with life then to live a lie.

Smoke
05-14-2005, 01:06 AM
Ross, 45, had been on death row for 18 years after his conviction for the murders of four young women and girls in Connecticut in the early 1980s. He later confessed to the murders of four more women in Connecticut and neighbouring New York state.

Several hundred opponents of the death penalty held a vigil outside the prison. Josh Rubenstein, the regional director for Amnesty International, said it was a "sad and unnecessary event".
How about a vigil for those 8 PEOPLE he killed? Again, these weakminded liberals only see the sunny side of humanity. How many people does one need to murder to get the death penality? 10, 100, 1000? I can't wait for Bin Laden to be captured so these idiots at "Complainers International" can embarrass themselves by saying "Bin Laden shouldn't be executed."

His family sought a last-minute injunction to stop the execution, arguing diminished responsibility. But they were turned down by the courts after Ross said last autumn that he was abandoning all appeals because his victims' families had suffered enough.
How about his family take a look at themselves and see if there is anything they did or didn't do to influence Ross into such a savage.

So let me say again, as in the recent eye-stabbing father's case, what good does it do to keep these people alive who have already shown they cannot be part of society? What about all those people who are hungry that we can't take care of in this country because we have manditory appeals instead of food programs? Why did it take 18 years to put this savage down?

stevethrower
05-14-2005, 02:42 PM
Still think they should execute these "people" the way they do it China... pistol shot to the back of the head... then you send the family the bill for the bullet...

APortablePhone
05-14-2005, 09:40 PM
This is a good thing.

As if the "thumbs up" didn't already tip people off?

The guy wanted to be killed, and he was, move along...nothing to see here.

The fact still remains that plenty of innocent people have been put on death row and later freed after they find the real killer that it's a very good thing we have the appeals process.

Watch the movie "The Thin Blue Line" to see how easily it can happen to someone with really bad luck.

BIV
05-15-2005, 05:30 AM
Good.....next?

PorchMonkey4Life
05-15-2005, 12:44 PM
i really hope that bastard died a slow painful death... we should have allowed the victoms family to tourture him first

kloraferm
05-18-2005, 05:53 PM
Adios shitbag