PDA

**See This Page With Full Graphics, Pictures and Color!** CLICK HERE --> : Foiled By Blair!!!!


whoisisthis
11-23-2005, 08:47 PM
so what's the problem here? Al-Jazeera is a tool to promote Islamic terrorism, smash them

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16397937%26method=full%26siteid=94762% 26headline=exclusive%2d%2dbush%2dplot%2dto%2dbomb% 2dhis%2darab%2dally-name_page.html


EXCLUSIVE: BUSH PLOT TO BOMB HIS ARAB ALLY
Madness of war memo
By Kevin Maguire And Andy Lines


PRESIDENT Bush planned to bomb Arab TV station al-Jazeera in friendly Qatar, a "Top Secret" No 10 memo reveals.

But he was talked out of it at a White House summit by Tony Blair, who said it would provoke a worldwide backlash.

A source said: "There's no doubt what Bush wanted, and no doubt Blair didn't want him to do it." Al-Jazeera is accused by the US of fuelling the Iraqi insurgency.

The attack would have led to a massacre of innocents on the territory of a key ally, enraged the Middle East and almost certainly have sparked bloody retaliation.

A source said last night: "The memo is explosive and hugely damaging to Bush.



"He made clear he wanted to bomb al-Jazeera in Qatar and elsewhere. Blair replied that would cause a big problem.

"There's no doubt what Bush wanted to do - and no doubt Blair didn't want him to do it."

A Government official suggested that the Bush threat had been "humorous, not serious".

But another source declared: "Bush was deadly serious, as was Blair. That much is absolutely clear from the language used by both men."

Yesterday former Labour Defence Minister Peter Kilfoyle challenged Downing Street to publish the five-page transcript of the two leaders' conversation. He said: "It's frightening to think that such a powerful man as Bush can propose such cavalier actions.

"I hope the Prime Minister insists this memo be published. It gives an insight into the mindset of those who were the architects of war."

Bush disclosed his plan to target al-Jazeera, a civilian station with a huge Mid-East following, at a White House face-to-face with Mr Blair on April 16 last year.

At the time, the US was launching an all-out assault on insurgents in the Iraqi town of Fallujah.

Al-Jazeera infuriated Washington and London by reporting from behind rebel lines and broadcasting pictures of dead soldiers, private contractors and Iraqi victims.

The station, watched by millions, has also been used by bin Laden and al-Qaeda to broadcast atrocities and to threaten the West.

Al-Jazeera's HQ is in the business district of Qatar's capital, Doha.

Its single-storey buildings would have made an easy target for bombers. As it is sited away from residential areas, and more than 10 miles from the US's desert base in Qatar, there would have been no danger of "collateral damage".

Dozens of al-Jazeera staff at the HQ are not, as many believe, Islamic fanatics. Instead, most are respected and highly trained technicians and journalists.

To have wiped them out would have been equivalent to bombing the BBC in London and the most spectacular foreign policy disaster since the Iraq War itself.

The No 10 memo now raises fresh doubts over US claims that previous attacks against al-Jazeera staff were military errors.

In 2001 the station's Kabul office was knocked out by two "smart" bombs. In 2003, al-Jazeera reporter Tareq Ayyoub was killed in a US missile strike on the station's Baghdad centre.

The memo, which also included details of troop deployments, turned up in May last year at the Northampton constituency office of then Labour MP Tony Clarke.

Cabinet Office civil servant David Keogh, 49, is accused under the Official Secrets Act of passing it to Leo O'Connor, 42, who used to work for Mr Clarke. Both are bailed to appear at Bow Street court next week.

Mr Clarke, who lost at the election, returned the memo to No 10.

He said Mr O'Connor had behaved "perfectly correctly".

Neither Mr O'Connor or Mr Keogh were available. No 10 did not comment.

LiddyRules
11-23-2005, 09:31 PM
Al-Jazeera is a tool to promote Islamic terrorism, smash them Sorry but Blair's right. I mean I'd love to smash them as much as the next guy, clearly Blair wanted to as well but this isn't Risk, you do have political repercussions you need to handle. The war would be a lot easier if we didn't have to appease every single fucking group out there. If we were to bomb the info distribution source, people would be up all over the world talking about how we want to prevent free speech (yes, I know) and encroaching on their culture. Bombing Al-Jazeera would have been a pretty bad move.

whoisisthis
11-23-2005, 10:40 PM
no, you're right


there's better, more sneaky ways to smash them...they should do those. Bombing's old school

jenzie
11-24-2005, 02:13 PM
so, when's fox gonna be exploderized then?

DJBigFatCock
11-24-2005, 02:28 PM
Simple, set up some special forces like Arabs, load em up with some of the seized insurgents explosives and RPGs, and send them on there merry way to take down a TV station. %90 of the SF have beards and ride around with rebel troops anyway. Special forces are used to go in and train rebel troops to fight against enemy governments so that theres limited US casualties. Thats who we sent into Afghanistan first and they still operate there now using rebels. SEALS just go in and kill kill kill and don't give a fuck who knows it. SF use the enemy against it self by exploiting their weaknesses.

BIV
11-25-2005, 03:43 AM
What's the phone number for Al-Jazeera? I bet the pests could take them out.

LiddyRules
11-25-2005, 04:02 AM
What's the phone number for Al-Jazeera? I bet the pests could take them out. The bright side- if there's a jihad on O&A Master Po can take them out.

jules
11-25-2005, 08:20 AM
so, when's fox gonna be exploderized then?
oh i get it fox is the same as al jazeera. haaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaa (and the laughter ensues) :haha7: :doh:

dj1i
11-25-2005, 05:43 PM
u spelled it wrong, it's faux...remember?