PDA

**See This Page With Full Graphics, Pictures and Color!** CLICK HERE --> : Terminator 4?


Jerry1
05-11-2007, 08:42 AM
Oh, this doesn't sound good.......

Terminator Will Be Back, Without Arnold by Gina Serpe
Thu May 10, 8:08 AM ET



Los Angeles (E! Online) - The Terminator is making good on its coming-back word. The Governator, not so much.

The Halcyon Company has announced plans to revive the cyborg-battling movie series with at least three more films, after the production company purchased all rights to the dormant franchise for an undisclosed, though likely eight-figure, sum.

But while Halcyon founders Victor Kubicek and Derek Anderson are looking to begin preproduction on Terminator 4 as soon as possible, they will do so without a leading man. Or man-machine.

Plot details for the fourth film have been kept under tight wraps, though are said to pick up with John Connor, heir to the rebellion, in his thirties, leading the remainder of the human race in its ever-worsening battle against the machines. As the film will mark the beginning of a new trilogy, rather than a continuation of the previous three installments, its unlikely that the Terminator himself, Arnold Schwarzenegger, will even take part in the film reinvention, other than perhaps a cameo.

Of course, there are other reasons why the Ah-nuld won't be featured on the big screen. He has a bit of a schedule conflict due to matters of a more gubernatorial nature.

T4 has already been fast-tracked for production, with Halcyon looking to get the installment in theaters by summer 2009. As it is, Schwarzenegger will be leading the state of California through 2011.

While a spokeswoman for the governor asserts that "no law says he couldn't" star in the reimagined flick if he wanted to, the project was nonetheless "not even on his radar."

Still, the franchise's new minders aren't worried about extending the brand beyond Arnie.

"With T3, we included many incidental details and plot points that, along with the ain narrative, set the stage for an entirely new set of inter-related stories covering the future adventures of John Connor and the Terminators," producer Moritz Borman said. "This new Terminator trilogy will build upon the already huge worldwide Terminator fan base, which was both revitalized and expanded with the global success of T3."

In fact, T3, along with T2 and, well, plain old T, have grossed just over $1 billion worldwide since Terminator was first released in 1984.

"The Terminator franchise represents by far the most popular and successful franchise not owned by a major studio," Kubicek said. "We see this global franchise as a cornerstone of Halcyon's future business plans."

A very large cornerstone.

In addition to the big-screen cyborg saga, the company snapped up all future merchandising and licensing rights to the franchise, future revenue generated by T3: Rise of the Machines and a portion of the rights to an almost guaranteed TV series based on the films.

Warner Bros. has already filmed a pilot for The Sarah Connor Chronicles, an hourlong show based around the Terminator character and mythology surrounding the movies. According to Variety, Fox has already expressed interest in the project, and could opt to pick up the series at next week's upfronts, when the fall prime-time schedules are unveiled

sknight
05-11-2007, 09:00 AM
It could be good, because there was a big fight between the machines and humans that wiped almost all of them out and sending one back in time was their only hope at that point.

Chester'sLiver
05-11-2007, 09:11 AM
I liked T3, I don't know how this would turn out but I would probably go see T4.

wes mantooth
05-11-2007, 06:21 PM
I'm there. It's one of the few sci-fi franchises that gets better with each sequel.

LiddyRules
05-11-2007, 06:27 PM
I'm there. It's one of the few sci-fi franchises that gets better with each sequel. You honestly thought T3 was the best of the trilogy? That's psychotic. I'm not saying T3 was bad but it was more of a generic actioner than the awesomeness of T1 or T2. Either of those movies you can watch at any point no matter what channel they're on.

And there's also the Sarah Connor Chronicles that was a pilot for this season. I don't know if it was picked up or not.

BIV
05-12-2007, 02:56 AM
This could be great. A new studio could be what this series needs to get a nice kick in the ass.

LiddyRules
05-12-2007, 03:00 AM
Fuck the fucking studios. Fuck them. Studios really only care about the bottom line. If they could they'd just turn it into another silly action series like they tried in T3.

Give us a writer/director with the vision of Cameron. Then I'll get interested. Otherwise, I'll expect the worst.

Xyn
05-12-2007, 03:33 AM
I don't feel strongly about this one way or the other. While I didn't hate T3, it certainly was not as exciting as T2 and not as interesting as the original Terminator.

If they do it justice, it could be good. If it turns out awful, I won't be too angry, just a bit annoyed as I usually am with crappy hollywood movies.

I'll go see it if the previews don't make it out to look as awful as we all know it could be.

WhiskeyWhispers
05-12-2007, 07:27 AM
I'm thinking this will be in the vein of the Alien vs Predator movie, meaning it will suck.

wes mantooth
05-12-2007, 09:14 AM
You honestly thought T3 was the best of the trilogy? That's psychotic. I'm not saying T3 was bad but it was more of a generic actioner than the awesomeness of T1 or T2. Either of those movies you can watch at any point no matter what channel they're on.

I do think T3 is the best of the series. I saw it in the theatre and I think the chase scene with the crane truck was one of the best action scenes ever filmed. Aside from Claires Danes annoying performance the whole cast did a great job. I loved T2 as well but I take points away from it because I hate sci fi/horror films with kids as one of the stars. You know nothing bad will ever happen to them and they're usually just used as a marketing tool to begin with. Kinda takes away from the story for me.

Imagine that, I dislike kids in the movies as well as real life. :icon_mrgr

Gonzoid
05-12-2007, 11:16 PM
I thought the 1st film was groundbreaking and incredible interesting. T2 was epic in feel and just a great overall story. T3, not so much. It definately did not have the grandiose feel of the T2 nor the originality of the original.

Cunt Smasher
05-13-2007, 10:37 PM
I was always fascinated by the cut scenes of the apocalyptic battles of man vs. machine,it would be cool to see an entire movie about it.Of course the premise of that goofy dragon movie with Matthew McCono(I can't fucking spell it) was cool but it ended up being total crap.

Hudson
05-13-2007, 10:47 PM
Lemme guess it is gonna be a kid....
Let me get Professor Peter Weller's film Screamers out of the can
Yes he is a Professor of History!