PDA

**See This Page With Full Graphics, Pictures and Color!** CLICK HERE --> : Court tosses FCC `wardrobe malfunction' fine


Clit Commander
07-21-2008, 12:21 PM
This is pretty significant stuff IMO since this bullshit event was half the reason behind the major change in attitude by these bullshit corporations towards terrestrial radio. The FCC needs to go fuck itself basically. Something we've said for a while.
By JOANN LOVIGLIO, Associated Press Writer
54 minutes ago


PHILADELPHIA - A federal appeals court on Monday threw out a $550,000 indecency fine against CBS Corp. for the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show that ended with Janet Jackson's breast-baring "wardrobe malfunction."

The three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission "acted arbitrarily and capriciously" in issuing the fine for the fleeting image of nudity.

The 90 million people watching the Super Bowl, many of them children, heard Justin Timberlake sing, "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song," as he reached for Jackson's bustier.

The court found that the FCC deviated from its nearly 30-year practice of fining indecent broadcast programming only when it was so "pervasive as to amount to 'shock treatment' for the audience."

"Like any agency, the FCC may change its policies without judicial second-guessing," the court said. "But it cannot change a well-established course of action without supplying notice of and a reasoned explanation for its policy departure."

The 3rd Circuit judges — Chief Judge Anthony J. Scirica, Judge Marjorie O. Rendell and Judge Julio M. Fuentes — also ruled that the FCC deviated from its long-held approach of applying identical standards to words and images when reviewing complaints of indecency.

"The Commission's determination that CBS' broadcast of a nine-sixteenths of one second glimpse of a bare female breast was actionably indecent evidenced the agency's departure from its prior policy," the court found. "Its orders constituted the announcement of a policy change — that fleeting images would no longer be excluded from the scope of actionable indecency."

A CBS spokeswoman said the company was working on a statement Monday morning. Messages left for an FCC spokesman were not immediately returned.

The FCC argued that Jackson's nudity, albeit fleeting, was graphic and explicit and CBS should have been forewarned. Jackson has said the decision to add a costume reveal — exposing her right breast, which had only a silver sunburst "shield" covering her nipple — came after the final rehearsal.

At the time, broadcasters did not employ a video delay for live events, a policy remedied within a week of the game.

In challenging the fine, CBS said that "fleeting, isolated or unintended" images should not automatically be considered indecent.

But the FCC argued that Jackson and Timberlake were employees of CBS and that the network should have to pay for their "willful" actions, given its lack of oversight.

In June 2007, a federal appeals court in New York invalidated the government's policy on fleeting profanities uttered over the airwaves. The case involved remarks made by Cher and Nicole Richie on awards shows carried on Fox stations.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080721/ap_en_ot/cbs_janet_jackson

Voss's Tumor
07-21-2008, 12:26 PM
I'm glad it got over-turned, but I'm afraid it'll be too little, too late.

Hopefully some radio attorneys will sacc up and use this precedent to do some good.

PMB917
07-21-2008, 01:44 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3498059

Its good to finally see somebody challenge the FCC and win.

bb1mobile
07-21-2008, 02:00 PM
I'm glad it got over-turned, but I'm afraid it'll be too little, too late.

Hopefully some radio attorneys will sacc up and use this precedent to do some good.

One can only hope this is a step in the right direction.

Edible Napalm
07-21-2008, 02:00 PM
Yeah its great, but...

...mod edit...already merged.

Hobo_Cum
07-21-2008, 05:30 PM
One can only hope this is a step in the right direction.

I'd have to say i think its a pretty BIG step.

It's basically the first extremely public case of it's type where an oversight committee has looked at the FCC and said "Okay you cunts, you don't have carte blanche to fine whoever you want and however much you want."

Some of the lines in that article ("The three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission "acted arbitrarily and capriciously") lead me to believe that maybe this can spur a the fabled "push back" that we've all been waiting for against the indecency/political correctness police

i sure hope so

Jims Rottweiler
07-21-2008, 05:46 PM
This is pretty significant stuff IMO since this bullshit event was half the reason behind the major change in attitude by these bullshit corporations towards terrestrial radio. The FCC needs to go fuck itself basically. Something we've said for a while.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080721/ap_en_ot/cbs_janet_jackson

It's nice to see the courts finally do the right thing, but a shitload of damage has already been done. And this case only applies to "fleeting" nudity during a live show, so I can't see how it can help terrestrial radio. There are a lot of things CBS could do to push back, but they haven't shown the stomach for it. For example, using questionable language during a news story should be protected but CBS and others are afraid to challenge it. They are just pussies rather than protectors of their own airwaves.

hardrocknrock
07-21-2008, 08:02 PM
There are actually many legal experts who question whether the FCC even <i>has</i> the right to regulate content. Their charter is to regulate things like frequencies and ownership conflicts of interest. The problem is, no one EVER goes the distance legally. They always just barter down the fines and settle. Hopefully the media companies will start to realize that, while it's cheaper in the short term to settle, they're being castrated in the process.

Sinn Fein
07-21-2008, 09:21 PM
Ok, how about someone undoes the shitstorm that it caused?

unklewilly
07-21-2008, 09:59 PM
does this mean they can say douchebag on the air again?

Ballbuster1
07-21-2008, 10:06 PM
Ok, how about someone undoes the shitstorm that it caused?
Yeah, good luck with that. I feel it's too late and the pc asshats have the stonger foothold at this point.

does this mean they can say douchebag on the air again?

Nah, CBS lawyers are still douchebags themselves and will continue to censor
unnecessary shit the way they have lately. They just don't get it and I doubt
they ever will.

GLENN_THE_TOOL
07-21-2008, 11:04 PM
if anything, the FCC should be fined or held in some way responsible for the uproar it caused because of something so "fleeting" that few people even saw it initially. but after the FCC caught wind and decided to get all pissy about it, it was played endlessly on television, turning a fleeting moment of nudity into a constant, repeated offense that was viewed by people of all ages over and over and over.

Professor Derek
07-22-2008, 04:14 PM
This was the death blow to live broadcasts. Now, everything is on a delay. So they'll just dump out & we won't get to see Britney's uterus fall out at the VMAs. Truly live broadcasts are gone.