Discussion in 'Current Events' started by d0uche_n0zzle, Oct 17, 2007.
At least that is what one DNA pioneer believes 'Fury at DNA pioneer's theory.'
elementary my dear Watson, elementary.
"He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade."
So he has no proof--hes just a crazy old fuck talking shit.
Can we have ten years on the clock please?
haha, darkie is inferior
Even if he could prove that on average blacks were dumber than whites it doesn't mean that there isn't a schwoog out there who is smarter than the average honkey. What I'm getting at is you've still got to judge people as individuals. Unless they're in my neighborhood at night. Then color comes into play.
All he did was say that black majority nations shouldn't try to replicate western democracies since their lower intelligence prevents success. Instead they should come up with a system of government that works with thier average intelligence level. Sounds very realistic and honest to me.
HOLY FUCK! Do you not don't know who James Watson is? If this claim is true, it's from one of the most eminent scientists of the last 100 years.... hardly a crazy old fuck.
Seriously though. Aside from the political incorrectness of it all, why should this be surprising or immediately written off?
As he said, evolution while geographically separated caused us to develop differently. Why is 95% of the NBA/NFL black? Why do black people sing better than whites?
Like Jimmy says, it's only ok to point out differences when it is a positive difference.
And I'm not saying I agree or think he is correct, but his statement is grounded in solid scientific logic.
I think everyone already knew this.
I want to know how those creepy Asians rank.
I guess that means I have to quit my corporate job and go back to work at kinko's… it's official that I'm not intelligent enough to be here!
FYI; this is where I work: www.lpk.com
when as a race they only like watermellon, banana's and fried chicken, you know they are dopes
Possibly the most obvious statement ever uttered.
Whether it's true or not - words hurt.
He's talking averages and aggregates. His comment was in reference to government building.
You put the stick into the termite nest, and the termites cling to it, then you eat them.
Whitey didnt come up with that !
Got it. That's what I get for skimming the article. Anyway, this does give Robert Mugabe a good excuse to suspend future elections.
"There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically."
Makes sense. If intelligence evolved separately and enough to make a significant difference, they're likely either smarter or dumber. Judging by the black human rights group immediately trying to remove his freedom of speech, I would also guess "dumber" if I had to choose.
I don't think the guy is racist. I think he's brutally honest and doesn't give a shit about being politically correct. The media loves taking the stuff he says out of context.
in other news -
The sun is hot.
Water is wet.
I had alot of west african friends in college. very smart people
Who wrote this study? Professor Anthony?
I find something wrong with this whole concept, especially since I know black people who are far more intelligent than I.
And I'm wondering what kind of testing was used on the African people and against what group was it based. Yes, I know it says white people, but in most parts of Africa, it's the white people who are educated while the blacks are not. So by what criteria can you gauge the intelligence? It would almost seem like comparing apples with oranges.
That doesn't mean anything in regards to what this Watson guy said. He is talking about averages and aggregates, you are talking about specific people. He didn't say all white people are smarter than all black people, he said from a national perspective whites are smarter than blacks.
He might not have any facts to back up his statements, or he might have a lot. Unfortunately the article doesn't focus on that at all. Most likely there have been almost no real studies done on this issue recently, it is too controversial. Merely researching the subject will end your career, even if you avoid making any conclusions.
I don't want to assume what he suggested is true, but what I will say is that there is a good likelyhood that it is true.