Discussion in 'Classic Opie & Anthony General Discussion' started by Patrice CK Fan, Jul 7, 2011.
pretty much sums up the murder case. Opie & Anthony are wrong.
That proves that she's a shit mom and a psycho, but does not prove that she murdered her daughter. Anthony is right.
Well, yes. But not when it can be used against you in a murder case. That is evidence, a motive.
Why is this a thread?
And that is not a motive.
That's not evidence. The prosecution didn't have anything. End of story.
There has been millions of cases where the circumstantial evidence is enough to convince a person along before actual evidence in a case, and usually, most of the time. It is true they committed the crime.
The Trial is over , right ?
x2. Another shitty Patrice CK thread. There are already 2 Casey Anthony threads, why start another?
edit: forgot the photo thread. 3 threads dedicated to this loving mother mourning the loss of her daughter.
I hope the Grammar Police take you into a back room with a phonebook.
Yea, I have no idea what he meant with that post. Made no sense.
If the prosecution couldnt prove it, what do you know that they didnt?
I said, millions of cases circumstantial evidence has been used to convict a criminal where no actual evidence proving the person committed the crime. Yes, believe it or not. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence by the name alone, and usually the circumstantial evidence was right. But, what does it matter any more. America needs criminals out on the streets so they can make money off them. This is why Americans are allowed to own guns to it counterbalance the fucked up court system.
Is this Bobo?
Convince a criminal ?
Why do they need convincing ?
And of what ?
And I said name one case where a person was convicted on circumstantial evidence alone.
Any case long before DNA evidence, and fingerprint evidence.
Name one. ONE case.
Google not working out, Patrice?
That's all well and good but, how do you explain that heavily redacted source you posted that appears to have been edited to deceive the readers?
Dude don't be so hard on yourself. Stick to relying to other people's threads.
You really do start terrible threads...
And leave this poor innocent girl alone.
His number his way off (there is no way its millions), you can bet there have been cases were people were convicted on circumstantial evidence or false eye witness reports. Many of these people were later proved innocent through DNA testing.
While her actions before she reported her daughter missing aren't enough to prove she was guilty of murder, I still believe that she did it.
Having said all that, there was no need for a new thread about this topic.
Thread Of The Day ?