Charlie Rangel facing allegations of voter suppression in primary win

Party Rooster

Unleash The Beast
Apr 27, 2005
40,284
7,454
438
The Inland Empire State
#1
Democrats gonna republican...:icon_cool

Rangel’s primary victory in question as vote count narrows lead

Published July 02, 2012

New York Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel’s primary win last week is being challenged amid allegations of voter suppression and an ongoing ballot count that over the weekend trimmed his margin to roughly 800 votes.

A court hearing is scheduled Monday afternoon in New York on the matter.

The 82-year-old Rangel was declared the victor Tuesday night in his quest for a 22nd term after he led his closest challenger, state Sen. Adriano Espaillat, by roughly 2,300 votes -- or 44-42 percent.

However, the New York City Board of Elections said Saturday night the margin had been trimmed to 802 votes as officials continue to count roughly 3,200 additional absentee ballots and affidavits – paper ballots cast by residents whose names did not appear on voter rolls and were not allowed to use the electronic voting machines.

"Four days after polls closed, we finally have a preliminary vote count, excluding thousands of paper ballots,” said Espaillat spokesman Ibrahim Khan. “With each new tally, Senator Espaillat's vote total increases."

The final tally is expected before the end of the week.

The Rangel campaign could not be reached for comment Monday.

Two years ago, a House panel convicted the 82-year-old lawmaker on multiple ethics violations, from failing to pay taxes on rental income from his Dominican Republic villa to accepting a rent-stabilized apartment from a New York City developer.

Rangel's newly drawn district now stretches from Harlem to the Bronx and includes more Hispanic residents.

The hearing scheduled before the state Supreme Court on Monday was filed by the Espaillat campaign. It alleges ballots are not being counted and some voting machines were broken.

The campaign said some of the affidavits are from Hispanic voters for Espaillat who were forced to cast them in an effort to suppress their votes.

In addition, Hispanic leaders are calling for federal oversight of the vote count.

“We have witnessed disturbing allegations of voter suppression and lack of transparency in the 13th Congressional District election,” said Maria Teresa Montilla, president of the Dominican American National Roundtable. “We are calling on the United States Department of Justice to take immediate action to monitor the Board of Elections’ proceedings.”

The group also has established a hotline for voters encountered barriers to the ballot box, including misinformation and lack of interpretation services.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...id-lawsuits-more-vote-counting/#ixzz1zUT54vB9
 

NuttyJim

Registered User
Feb 18, 2006
14,125
6,411
638
#2
those fuckers deserve what they get when they continue to vote for people like Rangel.
 

d0uche_n0zzle

**Negative_Creep**
Sep 15, 2004
46,854
6,936
763
F.U.B.A.R
#6
Eighty-two and the fuck still wants to hang around his pals in DC?

Retire, you dumb fucko.
 

NuttyJim

Registered User
Feb 18, 2006
14,125
6,411
638
#7
By "those fuckers" do you mean the rest of the country because he's a congressman and not just a corrupt local city councilman?
I wasn't aware that people outside the 15th Congressional District for the State of New York could vote for him. Man, those people in Seattle must be pissed due to his shenanigans in office. No, by those fuckers I was referring to his Congressional District that continuously vote in a corrupt individual. (according to accusations that is, I have no proof of such activity).
 

Josh_R

Registered User
Jan 29, 2005
5,847
458
578
Akron, Ohio
#9
Convicted of 11 counts of corruption and still wins reelection. Lovely constituents you have there, Charlie.
 

Don the Radio Guy

G-Bb-A-D
Donator
Mar 30, 2006
69,623
5,081
568
Wyoming
#13
Why the FUCK! don't we have age and term limits again? Fucking enough.
Because lame duck congressmen would be able to fuck us over even more with absolutely no recourse?

Also, let's not pretend the opponents would have been any better.
 

Begbie

Wackbag Generalissimo
Jul 21, 2003
18,079
5,491
838
Wilmington, NC
#14
We are calling on the United States Department of Justice to take immediate action to monitor the Board of Elections’ proceedings.
:haha7: :clap: :icon_razz

Oh yeah, I'm sure Eric is right on the case!

:rotf:
 

Neon

ネオン
Donator
Mar 23, 2008
51,826
18,547
513
Kingdom of Charis
#15
:haha7: :clap: :icon_razz

Oh yeah, I'm sure Eric is right on the case!

:rotf:
Considering Rangel "proudly" walked out of the contempt vote for Holder, I'd say you didn't have enough laughing emoticons in your post.
 

Party Rooster

Unleash The Beast
Apr 27, 2005
40,284
7,454
438
The Inland Empire State
#16
I wasn't aware that people outside the 15th Congressional District for the State of New York could vote for him. Man, those people in Seattle must be pissed due to his shenanigans in office. No, by those fuckers I was referring to his Congressional District that continuously vote in a corrupt individual. (according to accusations that is, I have no proof of such activity).
Meh, I just meant that his influences go farther than just his district. I guess if Marion Barry can keep getting elected nothing is really that shocking anymore.