Clinton Corruption Thread

#1
I think it deserves it's own thread to keep up with everything going on.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/...knew-outcome-of-fbi-hillary-probe-in-advance/
The chronology:

  • June 29th: Tarmac summit
  • July 1st: Lynch announces she’ll abide by FBI recommendation
  • July 1st: FBI agents mock Lynch announcement in texts, stating she already knows the outcome
  • July 5th: Comey statement recommending no charges in Hillary email investigation, prefaces statement with assertion that there was no coordination with DOJ and that they do not know what he was about to recommend.
 
#2
This looks like something...maybe.
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/aussie-complaint-tells-fbi-clinton-misled-government-down-under/
Former President Bill Clinton apparently misled Aussie officials in 2006 when he signed a $25 million memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Clinton Foundation and the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAT) in 2006, according to a complaint filed Thursday with the FBI.

The MOU committed the funds collected from Australian taxpayers to the American charity for medical projects it agreed to conduct inChina, Papua New Guinea, and Vietnam. The foundation also agreed to match the $25 million from its own funds under its Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative (CHAI).

The problem, according to Michael Smith, an investigative reporter and retired Australian police detective, is that Clinton was not at the time a director of the foundation that was created in 1997 to build and operate his presidential library in Little Rock, Arkansas.

Clinton was also barred from legally representing the foundation for five years after his losing his law license in 2001 in connection with his false testimony to the U.S. government during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which led to his impeachment by the House of Representatives in 1998.

In a Jan. 18, 2018, letter and complaint to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Smith said, “William J CLINTON signed the document over the words ‘For the William J Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative.’ In a statement (emailed to me) DFAT advised that Clinton executed the agreement as the ‘Founder’ of the Clinton Foundation.”

But Smith told Wray in the complaint, “Clinton was never the ‘founder’ of the Clinton Foundation, which was incorporated in 1997, nor of the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc. For at least five years from 2001, Clinton was prohibited from holding a number of legal and/or trustee positions on account of his disbarment following dishonesty convictions in U.S. courts. Clinton held no role and had no fiduciary responsibility for the Clinton Foundation or CHAI until 2013.”

During the formal ceremony announcing the MOU, Smith said “Clinton spoke as the decision-maker wholly responsible for the performance of the Clinton Foundation. He held no such role, and while he may have been confident in his ability to influence the board of the Clinton Foundation — his statements about control and establishment of the Clinton Foundation were false, misleading and had the effect of engendering unwarranted confidence in what turned out to be a false narrative concerning the foundation’s ability to deliver on its agreements.”

Related: Aussie Complaints Headed to FBI on Clinton Foundation’s Dealings Down Under

The Clinton charity was created to back the former chief executive’s presidential library — but soon after its founding became involved in programs with no connection to the original purpose other than the family name.

Allegations of mismanagement, fraud, and other serious crimes have shadowed the Clinton charity in connection with its programs in multiple countries of Africa, the Caribbean, and Asia. Most seriously, the allegations reportedly include providing watered-down HIV/AIDS medications to African sufferers of the dread disease.

A spokesman for the foundation did not respond to LifeZette’s request for comment.

Smith said earlier this week he was asked to provide to the FBI evidence he has collected in recent years that suggest multiple problems with the Clinton Foundation’s lucrative relationship with influential Australian officials.
 
#3
http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/201...xpayer-donations-to-the-clinton-foundati.html
[QUOTE


You will be aware that criminal investigations involving the Clinton Foundation are now underway in the United States.

I have been asked to provide the FBI with further and better particulars about allegations regarding improper donations to the CF funded by Australian taxpayers.

I am now preparing complaints/referrals to the FBI regarding the following matters:

FIRST OFFENCE
  • A $25M financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception in the 22 February 2006 MOU between
    • the Australian Government and
    • the Clinton Presidential Library and
    • the Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc (CHAI) -
  • Offenders Bill CLINTON and Alexander DOWNER.
SECOND OFFENCE
  • The corrupt October 2006 backdating of false tender advertisements purporting to advertise the availability of
    • a $15M contract to provide HIV/Aids services in PNG
    • on behalf of the Australian Government,
    • after an agreement was already in place to pay the Clinton Foundation and/or associates.
  • Offenders Bill CLINTON and Alexander DOWNER
THIRD OFFENCE
  • The unlawful and corrupt incorporation of an incorporated association known as
    • the "William J. Clinton Foundation HIV/Aids Initiative - PNG" - which took place
    • between 21 August 2006 and 10:03AM on 24 August 2006 - at
    • Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
  • Offenders Ruby SHANG and Bill CLINTON and certain PNG officials
FOURTH OFFENCE
  • The $10M financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception
  • between 1 April 2008 and 25 September 2008, at
  • Washington DC, New York NY and Canberra Australia, involving an MOU between
    • the Australian Government,
    • the "Clinton Climate Initiative" and
    • the purported "Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute Inc"
  • Offenders Kevin Michael RUDD, Bill CLINTON, Hillary CLINTON
FIFTH OFFENCE
  • The $14M financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception
    • during September 2012 at
    • Canberra Australia and New York NY, involving the award of
    • a contract to the Clinton Foundation to design and build a carbon accounting scheme in Kenya
    • on behalf of The Australian Government; and
    • certain financial advantages obtained by Julia GILLARD as a result of the corrupt payments made under the purported contract, commonly known as the Clinton Foundation "Pay to Play" scheme
  • Offenders Julie Eileen GILLARD, then US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham CLINTON and Greg COMBET
SIXTH OFFENCE
  • The $88M financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception
    • on 22 September 2014 at
    • New York NY, involving
    • a MOU between the Australian Government and certain Clinton Foundation entities
    • which purported to retrospectively erase the "Clinton HIV/Aids Initiative Inc" (CHAI) as a contracting party with the Australian Government, and replace it with
    • the "Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc" (CHAI)
  • Offenders - Julie BISHOP and Bill CLINTON
I am also preparing to file a private criminal prosecution of GILLARD in an Australian court along with formal advice to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions regarding the charges GILLARD will face.
][/QUOTE]
 
#4
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette...ett-others-worry-donations-clinton-charities/
The revived FBI and continuing IRS investigations will eventually realize due diligence has been lacking from the start
by Charles Ortel | Updated 19 Jan 2018 at 7:43 PM


So the FBI is again investigating the “Bill, Hillary & Clinton Foundation.” That should make Bill and Melinda Gates, Warren Buffett, and other affluent Americans who have given to the Clinton Foundation wish they had asked more questions before writing those checks.

Here’s why: “Due diligence” doesn’t end when the Clinton “charities” cash your check.

The FBI agents and forensic accountants probing the Clinton Foundation must go all the way back to Oct. 23, 1997, and examine precisely how a public charity, organized to hold federal records of the Clinton presidency, somehow evolved by 2002 to “fight HIV/AIDS internationally,” plus a raft of additional tax-exempt purposes that were never properly authorized in the foundation’s Articles of Incorporation.

The FBI should train its sights on the Dallas office of the IRS. On May 19, 2015, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and colleagues in the U.S. House of Representatives called on the federal tax agency to investigate the Clinton Foundation. The IRS treated this solidly grounded request dismissively.

It was not until July 22, 2016, following a second congressional request led by Blackburn, that then-IRS chief John Koskinen said agency officials in Dallas would open a review of the multiple issues flagged by the Republican members of Congress.

Records already held by the IRS concerning the main Clinton Foundation and its affiliates are voluminous and include key information the public does not have, such as the names and precise amounts donated by major contributors each year from 1998 through 2016.

The IRS also has the ability to cross-check declarations made by the Clinton Foundation with declarations made by donors such as the Gates Foundation that are private foundations. The Clinton charity is a public foundation, and there are significant differences involved.

The FBI should review the IRS’s work from July 22, 2016, forward to determine how comprehensively the tax agency examined Clinton Foundation filings and to spot the multiple massive defects in the charity’s official reports, including false statements and noncompliant financial audits.

Big trouble for big donors to the Clintons. Without access to a Nov. 18, 2004, agreement signed by the Clinton Foundation, investigators will not know the foundation is required to remain a “public charity” as long as federal records of the Clinton presidency are kept in its Little Rock, Arkansas, presidential library.

Note here that a “public charity” must be supported broadly by members of the public and cannot be controlled by a single family. Then further note that as of Nov. 2, 2013, the Clinton Foundation violated its presidential library agreement with the National Archives by amending its bylaws to create Class A and Class B directors.

This fact has yet to be shared as required with all of the regulators in all of the states where the Clintons solicit charitable contributions, perhaps because the amendments gave Class A directors unchallenged authority to dominate the Clinton Foundation. The amendments specifically named as Class A directors Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton.

That created major league tax problems for the Clinton Foundation and its private foundation donors such as the Gates, beginning in 2013 when the charity switched auditors from BKD, LLP to PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Why? Because both the Clinton Foundation and its multiple affiliates ceased being validly organized and operated public charities as a result of the Class A/Class B amendment. This is key for both the IRS and FBI investigators, and such donors as the Gates and Buffett.

Clock ticks for Clintons’ private foundation donors. A private foundation may not contribute money to an entity claiming to be a public charity when the recipient is not in fact a validly organized and operated public charity. Such grants are treated by the IRS as “taxable expenditures.” A longstanding pattern and practice of making taxable expenditures can provoke stiff penalties and even lead to winding up of a private foundation donor.

The Clinton Foundation and many large private foundations operate in New York State where charities must register and where they are required to report “material changes” in their legal status and operating structures within 30 days.

Starting in 2001, the Gates Foundation made numerous donations to the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates as can be seen through careful review of Gates Foundation public filings. The Gates and Buffett foundations have experienced and highly intelligent persons who should have spotted the raft of defects evident in filings of the Clinton Foundation charity network.

Why have the Gates and Buffett worked so closely with a set of charities whose public record is so deeply flawed and that now is under investigation by the FBI and IRS?

Problems for foreign governments, too. Why have so many foreign governments contributed large sums to the Clinton Foundation, while not seeming to care about obvious defects in the public record? And why did it take so long for the IRS to spot many obvious red flags in Clinton Foundation filings?

President Donald Trump will soon attend the World Economic Forum at Davos, along with representatives of advocates for unregulated “globalism,” many of whom benefit from loosely controlled charities that are in fact slush funds for the rich and powerful.

Meanwhile, former Rep. Corrine Brown, an African-American Democrat from Florida, will shortly report to federal prison for her part in running an $800,000 charity as a personal piggy bank. How long till accounting firms realize clients who donated to the Clinton Foundation have huge potential tax problems constituting “material changes” reportable in New York, California, and other states?

And how much longer will the Clinton Foundation charity network be allowed to solicit funds? The issue of effectively regulating and disciplining illegally organized and operated charities is about to become front of mind worldwide.
 

Mommadeez4u

Bastard coated bastard w/ bastard filling
#5
Follow @CharlesOrtel, he's the unequivocal prime authority on the utterly corrupt 'Clinton Foundation'. His white papers and interviews are legendary.


charlesortel.com
 

gleet

What's black and white and red all over?
#7
I've been waiting over a quarter century for those indictments to come rolling in. Call me when they have the frog march.
 

MayrMeninoCrash

Liberal Psycopath
#8
I know you can't separate the two but I honestly don't give a shit about the Clinton Foundation. Sure it was used for shady stuff, but there's too many loopholes that they can slip out of and claim that the charity is legit. Short of a smoking gun email where Bill or Hillary basically admits it is a scam, we aren't going to go anywhere with that.

I'd much rather focus on the FBI/DOJ/NSA conspiracy with the Democrats, Obama and ultimately Hillary.
 

d0uche_n0zzle

**Negative_Creep**
#9
There isn't enough web space to list all their crimes, sir.
 

JoeyDVDZ

Well-Known Member
Donator
#10
I know you can't separate the two but I honestly don't give a shit about the Clinton Foundation. Sure it was used for shady stuff, but there's too many loopholes that they can slip out of and claim that the charity is legit. Short of a smoking gun email where Bill or Hillary basically admits it is a scam, we aren't going to go anywhere with that.

I'd much rather focus on the FBI/DOJ/NSA conspiracy with the Democrats, Obama and ultimately Hillary.
Does seem like the most straightforward path to proving corruption. The evidence is starting to become overwhelming.
 

Mommadeez4u

Bastard coated bastard w/ bastard filling
#12
I know you can't separate the two but I honestly don't give a shit about the Clinton Foundation. Sure it was used for shady stuff, but there's too many loopholes that they can slip out of and claim that the charity is legit. Short of a smoking gun email where Bill or Hillary basically admits it is a scam, we aren't going to go anywhere with that.

I'd much rather focus on the FBI/DOJ/NSA conspiracy with the Democrats, Obama and ultimately Hillary.
Dude Charles Ortel has them dead to rights. The penalties for charity fraud are horrific. Case in point: Negress in Chief Congress-coon Corrine Brown is a week away from having to report to federal prison for a 5 year stretch for her relatively small role in an $800,000 charity fraud case. What the Clintons and their associates did in many orders of magnitude worse, some estimates run into the billions of dollars.
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator
#13
Dude Charles Ortel has them dead to rights. The penalties for charity fraud are horrific. Case in point: Negress in Chief Congress-coon Corrine Brown is a week away from having to report to federal prison for a 5 year stretch for her relatively small role in an $800,000 charity fraud case. What the Clintons and their associates did in many orders of magnitude worse, some estimates run into the billions of dollars.
I agree, but it still won't happen.

Can you just imagine the delicious salt if Bill and Hillary were both sitting in prison while Trump was in the White House? Oh, it would be succulent.

An adorable boy can dream.
 

Begbie

Wackbag Generalissimo
#15
Fuck, I still LOVE this exchange...


And you know that with everything we know about the Clinton's and democrats...they had to have flinched when Trump said this. I even think some were probably pretty nervous when Trump won.
 

Mommadeez4u

Bastard coated bastard w/ bastard filling
#16
The Key to Understanding Uranium One, Russia, and the Clintons

There are limited supplies around the world of the precious element required for nuclear weapons and power plants

by Charles Ortel | Updated 22 Jan 2018 at 6:20 AM

Solid truths about the 2016 presidential race are now emerging despite liberal journalists’ being locked in their echo chamber convinced ab initio that President Donald Trump will be impeached for colluding with the Russian government to trounce former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Unlocking lingering mysteries about the Clinton family’s machinations with their Clinton Foundation and related “charities,” particularly during former President Barack Obama’s tenure in the White House, should accelerate as governments worldwide empower law enforcement agencies to find answers to basic questions.

Follow the money for real motives. So far, special counsel Robert Mueller has surfaced no tangible evidence of “collusion” between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, or foreign interests.

However, on Jan. 12, 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice announced an 11-count indictment against the operator of a nuclear fuel transportation company based in Maryland, alleging criminal activities dating from 2009 that likely will tie to Uranium One, now controlled by Russia.

Why care about uranium? Uranium is a key component for nuclear fuel. The processing, transporting, and storing of uranium are activities the federal government regulates to protect public safety and to stop enemies from using enriched uranium to build nuclear weapons.

Failures to control use of uranium inside America’s borders are deeply disturbing, but does it actually matter how we source uranium?

Supplies are plentiful on world markets, and prices have continuously dropped from pre-crisis peaks for the past 11 years, so some argue relying on imported uranium poses minimal dangers. Since June 2007, the per-pound price of uranium has tumbled 83 percent from $136 to $24, on a fairly consistent downward trajectory.

There are abundant supplies of uranium. Current estimates of known reserves suggest that we presently have enough uranium on the planet to service 90 years’ of use at current consumption levels.

Uranium producers’ near-monopoly. Here is the catch: Uranium reserves are concentrated in less than 10 percent of all nations, with 66 percent of known recoverable reserves in just five countries: Australia (29 percent), Kazakhstan (13 percent), Canada (9 percent), Russia (9 percent), and South Africa (6 percent). In contrast, the U.S. holds just 1 percent of global uranium reserves.

Nuclear power plants generated 20 percent of America’s electricity in 2016, more than 20 times the amount of electricity generated by solar units and a third more than all renewable sources. These plants are, on average, more than 37 years old.

No American wants another Three Mile Island or Chernobyl or Fukushima, so lingering concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants have meant only limited additions to nuclear capacity in recent decades.

Related: Judicial Watch Chief Urges DOJ to Probe Clinton Foundation’s Uranium One Ties

What would happen to electricity costs if the federal government simultaneously clamped down on coal use and made it even more difficult to recommission and augment nuclear power plants?

The values of green investments might soar, while the fossil fuel industry would suffer, creating a win-win for enemies of the United States, for enemies of capitalism, and for the “sustainable” investors who gorged themselves on the $825 billion economic stimulus plan approved in President Barack Obama’s first year in office.

In coming weeks, we should learn that the Uranium One scandal was less about cornering the uranium market — and more about corruption and fraud that strangely may have been covered up by officials within the FBI, Justice Department, IRS, and offices in many other governments.

Tomorrow: Unregulated Cash Transfers for Corrupt Politicians

Charles Ortel, a retired New York investment banker, concentrates on exposing complex frauds in his new career as an investigator, writer and commentator. Since August 2017, he has been hosting the Sunday with Charles podcast and covering the Clinton Foundation case in depth, using publicly available source materials
 
#18
Interesting...if true...

I've been modding my phones for years, haven't heard of this (had several Samsung's) and quick Google search doesn't come up with much. But, that doesn't mean the FBI doesn't have a system to do this, it is possible.
 

ruckstande

Posts mostly from the shitter.
#19
Fox is beginning to go hard for now with the corruption business. I'm looking forward to Tucker tonight.
 

KRSOne

Registered User
#20
I heard Bill Murry do a Martin Shkreli joke. I hadn't heard about him in a long time so I wondered why he was all of a sudden relevant again. Apparently he was put in prison for making a joke on facebook telling people to get a strand of Clintons hair. The judge said he was a threat to the community. It shows how much power and influence the Clintons still have in government. The people on twitter and facebook who threatened to do harm to President Trump were not put in jail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...izes-for-facebook-post-about-hillary-clinton/

“The fact that he continues to remain unaware of the inappropriateness of his actions or words demonstrates to me that he may be creating ongoing risk to the community,” said U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto, in revoking his bond.

“This is a solicitation of assault. That is not protected by the First Amendment.”
If thats true why is there not thousands of people in jail for threatening the president?
 

Floyd1977

Registered User
#21
I heard Bill Murry do a Martin Shkreli joke. I hadn't heard about him in a long time so I wondered why he was all of a sudden relevant again. Apparently he was put in prison for making a joke on facebook telling people to get a strand of Clintons hair. The judge said he was a threat to the community. It shows how much power and influence the Clintons still have in government. The people on twitter and facebook who threatened to do harm to President Trump were not put in jail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...izes-for-facebook-post-about-hillary-clinton/



If thats true why is there not thousands of people in jail for threatening the president?
There was the whole raising the price of that HIV drug by thousands of dollars making him one of the most hated people on earth which would make any lefty judge or whoever burning to throw him even more in jail.
 

Begbie

Wackbag Generalissimo
#22
I've been modding my phones for years, haven't heard of this (had several Samsung's) and quick Google search doesn't come up with much. But, that doesn't mean the FBI doesn't have a system to do this, it is possible.
Goes back a few years, but I think Knox was introduced with the Galaxy S5. I know developers (at least over at XDA) have had alot of trouble with it over the last few years with it adding a whole 'nother level of security to crack (or at least fear over it bricking the device). I always installed CFW on my S3, but was too chickenshit to do it on my S5, Note 5 and now Note 8. I just didn't know about it possibly archiving text messages and other data. Would not surprise me in the slightest.
 

LineBackerU

There is a good chance I am blocking you.
Donator
#23
President Hillary Clinton is going to get impeached for this. Wait, she lost? Somebody should probably tell Donald and members of his Pravda that.
 

gleet

What's black and white and red all over?
#24
President Hillary Clinton is going to get impeached for this. Wait, she lost? Somebody should probably tell Donald and members of his Pravda that.
You have years of practice looking the other way.
 

JoeyDVDZ

Well-Known Member
Donator
#25
President Hillary Clinton is going to get impeached for this. Wait, she lost? Somebody should probably tell Donald and members of his Pravda that.
Sorry, but just because she lost does NOT mean she gets to skate on being a criminal. Two very different things. Sorry, I know how salty your vagina is over Trump being the president.
 
Top