D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray vetoes ‘living wage’ bill with nod to Wal-Mart

BIV

I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.
Apr 22, 2002
79,630
27,842
898
Seattle
#1
Mayor Vincent C. Gray on Thursday vetoed a bill that would raise the minimum wage at many large retail stores, setting up a crucial vote next week in the D.C. Council where proponents of the bill do not appear to have the support to override it.

The decision, if it stands, means Wal-Mart will continue to build six stores slated for the District — a victory for the retailer that has experienced workforce unrest over wages as it attempts to expand into urban areas across the country.

Announcing his veto decision, Mr. Gray called the bill a “job killer” and stressed that other retailers, not just Wal-Mart, made it clear to him that if the bill passed they would reconsider expanding in the city. He said he plans to support an overall increase to the minimum wage and hopes the debate stirred by the so-called “living wage” legislation can lead to an agreement.

The mayor said in a statement that he vetoed the Large Retailer Accountability Act “precisely because I believe in providing a living wage to as many District residents as possible — and this bill is not a true living-wage measure.”

“While the intentions of its supporters were good, this bill is simply a woefully inadequate and flawed vehicle for achieving the goal we all share,” he said.

The mayor vetoed the bill nearly 60 days after the it was approved by a divided council on an 8-5 vote. An override of the veto would require nine votes, but it seemed unlikely Thursday that any of the five members who voted against the bill are willing to change sides. D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, a Democrat, has scheduled the override vote for the council’s next full meeting Tuesday.

The bill specifically applies to businesses without union labor that occupy in excess of 75,000 square feet and whose parent companies gross $1 billion or more. It would force those retailers to provide pay and benefits worth $12.50 an hour — a so-called “living wage” for workers. The current minimum wage is $8.25 an hour.

The measure has been associated most closely with Wal-Mart, but other large retailers that are doing business in the city and meet its specifications would be subject to its provisions and would have to pay the higher wages after four years.

Critics voiced concern that it could jeopardize job growth if retailers were forced to pay higher wages. Mr. Gray said more than 4,000 jobs — including those from prospective retailers such as Lowe's and Wegmans — were in jeopardy if the bill passes.

Wal-Mart threatened to abandon plans for three stores and possibly pull out of three others under construction if the bill passed. The stores are projected to bring about 1,800 jobs to the District.

A Wal-Mart spokesman said that with the “discriminatory legislation is behind us,” the corporation will move forward with all six of its stores — downplaying any possibility of an override by the council.

“Given all the criticism the bill has received locally and nationally, it would only make sense that a few of the original supporters change their vote,” Wal-Mart spokesman Steven Restivo said.

Council members Yvette M. Alexander, Ward 7 Democrat; Muriel Bowser, Ward 4 Democrat; David A. Catania, at-large independent; Mary M. Cheh, Ward 3 Democrat; and Tommy Wells, Ward 6 Democrat, voted against the bill. Mr. Wells plans next week to introduce legislation that would raise the city’s overall minimum wage over the next two years to $10.25 an hour plus increases after that to take into account the cost of urban living.

The standoff put the mayor in a tough spot because he is considered an ally of labor unions but also enticed Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to build the stores — including two in Ward 7, where he lives.

Wal-Mart officials have said their jobs are particularly valuable in inner cities, where unemployment is often at double-digit levels and many young people are seeking first-time employment. The company announced its campaign to enter urban markets several years ago as it was experiencing a slump during the recession.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/12/dc-mayor-vetoes-living-wage-bill/#ixzz2emRJNTtx
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Continues at the link.
 

NuttyJim

Registered User
Feb 18, 2006
14,154
6,429
638
#2
my statement has nothing to do with the article but I truly hate DC
 

steve500

Registered User
Oct 20, 2008
4,520
2,099
368
35,000 ft
#4
Used to live there and the lack of walmart drove us nuts. Whole foods was pretty much the only decent choice for groceries if you didn't feel like going to 9 different stores to buy everything.

Walmart will
1) Create a ton of jobs
2) Make food and other goods affordable, which will allow more residents to eat healthy
3) Force the many shithole sellers (the ones who supported this bill most) to either shape up or go out of business. For example, one store had all the produce stored bruised/rotted side down, but as soon as you picked an apple or whatever up noticed how bad it was, some arab savage who follows customers would bark that you have to buy it since you touched it.


Hard to believe that there's any public support to blocking such an overwhelmingly positive asset from expanding into DC.
 

Lord Zero

Viciously Silly
Aug 25, 2008
54,326
13,009
438
Atlanta, GA
#5
I'm glad that he vetoed it, but I hate that he did it just to appease Wal-Mart instead of doing it just because it was the right thing to do.
 

whiskeyguy

PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.
Donator
Jan 12, 2010
36,710
22,327
398
Northern California
#6
I'm glad that he vetoed it, but I hate that he did it just to appease Wal-Mart instead of doing it just because it was the right thing to do.
I agree, but on the other hand I love that companies are finally telling places like this that they can go fuck themselves if they make it harder to do business.