OpieRadio Logo
Compound Media Logo
Jim Norton Logo

Do you care about The First Amendment?

Discussion in 'Classic Opie & Anthony General Discussion' started by SOS, May 30, 2012.

  1. SOS

    SOS ONA
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2000
    Messages:
    47,931
    Likes Received:
    8,828
    Do you care about The First Amendment?


    Do you care about The Bill of Rights?


    Do you care about the rest of the amendments added throughout the years to the US Constitution?

    Or would you like some people to make up new rules that contradicts The Constitution when it suits them? By guys in black robes?


    I know there are people who want to censor "hate speech" and other unsettling speech but are prevented because of US' Constitution.


    Let's not care about it. /loud voice

    :really?:


    Churchill said "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."
     
  2. Don the Radio Guy

    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    69,628
    Likes Received:
    5,082
    Did a guest threaten to sexually assault the Queen again?
     
  3. Your_Moms_Box

    Your_Moms_Box Free Shit / Socialism 2016

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    5,755
    Likes Received:
    469
    drinking already sos?
     
  4. JoeyDVDZ

    JoeyDVDZ That's MR. MOJO, Motherfucker!

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,433
    Likes Received:
    5,452
    I care very deeply about the constitution, and the bill of rights. I also acknowledge that it's an evolving concept, and has to move with the circumstances. I detest, however, people and/or governments that force these documents & their principles to bend to suit their own desires.
     
  5. Hoffman

    Hoffman Guess who's back? Hoffman's back

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    34,674
    Likes Received:
    2,023
    I say fuck all of the Amendments.
     
  6. Konstantin K

    Konstantin K Big League Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    3,897
    I still care about the First Amendment, but I think it's time we start seeing other people.
     
  7. CaffeeDiva

    CaffeeDiva Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didn't expect a thread to rival the Melissa one so soon.
     
  8. fletcher

    fletcher Darkness always says hello.
    Donator

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    59,552
    Likes Received:
    19,770
    The signal has gone up. Now it is only a matter of time...
     
  9. Don the Radio Guy

    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    69,628
    Likes Received:
    5,082
    No. That's the whole point. We're born with these liberties. Government doesn't GIVE them to us via a piece of paper. That piece of paper tells government that they can't do certain things. To allow that to "move with the circumstances" is how you end up having certain words banned. Then certain guns. Then the police can just kick down your door and take your shit.

    Freedoms are absolute.
     
  10. Hoffman

    Hoffman Guess who's back? Hoffman's back

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    34,674
    Likes Received:
    2,023
    But that's not true Don. We DO "move with the circumstances"; that's what Amendments are for. If we didn't move with the circumstances we'd still have slaves and women wouldn't be able to vote.
     
  11. Don the Radio Guy

    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    69,628
    Likes Received:
    5,082
    Good point. Amendments are how the Constitution can be adapted, but the freedoms we're born with don't change regardless.
     
  12. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,186
    Likes Received:
    21,791
    That's surprising coming from someone who doesn't live in Jersey.
     
  13. CaffeeDiva

    CaffeeDiva Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah but we're born with the freedom to shit, piss, drive, fuck, ****, murder, hunt, and say whatever we can, where we can, when we can. We regulate these freedoms to keep society functioning in a way that the majority of people can enjoy.

    The freedoms we should preserve are the ones that we can make intellectual arguments for, at least in my opinion. I think there is a valid argument for being able to express yourself, but also one that you should be restricted so that you're not expressing your hatred for your neighbor every night at 3am, outside of his bedroom window.

    As far as firearms, I think you should absolutely be able to protect your house. Carrying laws and automatic weapons are issues I'm undecided on.

    Either way, a right or freedom should make sense first, then have the Constitution protect it based on the merit of the right or freedom, not based on whether some asshole 300 years ago agreed or not. Merely pointing to the Constitution as some Godly ordained article is nonsensical, since it's clearly had flaws in it that required amendments.

    These aren't all in response to you Don, just addressing some arguments that generally arise in discussions of this nature.
     
  14. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,186
    Likes Received:
    21,791
    So you think inalienable freedoms can be "argued" away? The 2nd Amendment was not created simply to protect our homes from intruders... it was created so that the citizens of this country could defend themselves from an oppressive government... foreign or domestic. In order to retain that ability automatic weapons are pretty much a necessity.

    There is a way to change the Constitution... you amend it. If you can't gain enough support to amend it, then you fucking follow it, regardless of what you think about it. The Constitution was created to protect the rights of the individual... not simply those of the majority... yet your argument completely dismantles that concept and makes the entire document arbitrary and subject to the whims of whichever group is in power at any given time.
     
  15. Josh_R

    Josh_R Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,847
    Likes Received:
    458
    You misunderstand the meaning of freedom (at least the meaning accepted by most non-anarchists). Freedom/liberty is the right to do whatever you want whenever you want, so long as you don't infringe on anyone else's freedom in the process. Using that definition, there is no need to explain why one needs certain rights, because by definition those rights have no effect on anyone else. One should not have to ask permission to partake in an activity which does not infringe upon the rights of anyone else.
     
  16. CostaTheCrazyGreek

    CostaTheCrazyGreek Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    56
  17. Anal Pizza

    Anal Pizza Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    548
    Likes Received:
    32
  18. Stig

    Stig Wackbag's New Favorite Heel

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Messages:
    80,636
    Likes Received:
    4,411
    But what about The Children?
     
  19. nikoloslvy

    nikoloslvy I wear my sunglasses at night...Anyone want fries?
    Donator

    Joined:
    May 5, 2003
    Messages:
    4,936
    Likes Received:
    121
    [video=youtube;-lCUg46bzXc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lCUg46bzXc[/video]
     
  20. Hudson

    Hudson Supreme Champion!!!!!
    Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    32,839
    Likes Received:
    4,557
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"- Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    And does this have anything to do with the dumping into a replay of last week with Ice T on the live internet feed and Cell phone app?
     
  21. CaffeeDiva

    CaffeeDiva Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    0
    What makes freedoms inalienable? Or do you just mean legally inalienable? I don't think that fundamentally valued freedoms can be argued away, I think the ones that are important can't be argued. That's my entire point. That if you have an argument that says that these are fundamental to happiness and human existence then it's a valid argument. If you can't articulate it, then you should learn how to, or reevaluate your position.

    If you're a man of science, I don't get why you can't think that logic should prevail in human rights. That absolutely does not mean that you are subject to the whim of those in power. It's the exact opposite of that. Whims are irrational emotions. Intellectual arguments look at the fundamental issues at stake.

    We already openly and happily restrict certain freedoms to protect certain rights. People talk about freedoms in absolutes when nobody really wants that.

    I completely disagree with censorship, and I have a rational argument for that reasoning. I don't think that you should just dismantle the Constitution, but you have to acknowledge that it was written with flaws, by flawed men. Amendments would prove that. The Constitution should be there to establish fundamental and legally inalienable freedoms, but those freedoms need to be backed with reason.

    Maybe you're misinterpreting my point or I'm doing a poor job of articulating it through text. I'm only saying that you need to have an intellectual reasoning to back up your argument over customs and history. If it's solely based on Founding Fathers this and America that, then you're following customs for customs' sake. "I leave symbols to the symbol-minded" would be a concise way of stating my position

    My response was to the idea of having these sort of "innate" freedoms. I think there are essential freedoms that intellectually we agree are necessary in being a free human being. The idea that they are guaranteed at birth and the government is the only entity to strip them from us is what I was saying was invalid. Any person can control you through means of coercion, and often do. It's human behavior that exists in government, business, and crime.
     
  22. CaffeeDiva

    CaffeeDiva Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's a cascading river of saliva upon which his Mars-like voice rafts out of his mouth. It's intolerable. I skipped past the music and heard him say, essentially, that slippery slope arguments are spot on, but this wetback's wet mouth prevented me from hearing him support that statement.
     
  23. JoeyDVDZ

    JoeyDVDZ That's MR. MOJO, Motherfucker!

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,433
    Likes Received:
    5,452
    This is what I was trying to say; apparently I didn't choose my words wisely. I do actually agree with you Don, but the amendments are to address issues not specifically adressed in the main body of the document.
     
  24. Hudson

    Hudson Supreme Champion!!!!!
    Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    32,839
    Likes Received:
    4,557
    John Locke on Liberty..one of the things the Founding Fathers used:
     
  25. KRSOne

    KRSOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    12,684
    Likes Received:
    2,854
    Last week John Stossel show was on this topic, he talked about all the hate he gets from the left and how all these left wing groups are demanding that FOX fire him because of his views on civil rights. He went out into the streets of NY and asked people if they believe in free speech and most said they do but when he asked about specific speech a lot of them said it should be illegal to say hateful, racist, or sexist things.
     

Share This Page