EA is run by out of touch arrogant cunts

Psychopath

Plata O Plomo
Dec 28, 2008
17,710
3,348
393
hell
#1
Fuck this company.
http://consumerist.com/2013/04/05/e...-success-on-homophobes-and-whiny-madden-fans/


wcia 2013
EA Admits It “Can Do Better” But Blames Worst Company Success On Homophobes And Whiny Madden Fans

By Chris Morran April 5, 2013
Video game giant EA is on the precipice of having a chance to repeat as grand champion in the Worst Company In America tournament, so one might think this would be a time for EA to make nice with the customers who feel like they are being mistreated. And in an EA.com blog post, Chief Operating Officer Peter Moore does admit to mistakes and promise to “do better.” But, for reasons we can’t even begin to fathom, he didn’t stop there.
SHRUGGING OFF CONCERNS
In his statement, Mr. Moore begins by questioning the merit of Consumerist readers’ opinions on what constitutes a “worst company.”
“This is the same poll that last year judged us as worse than companies responsible for the biggest oil spill in history,” writes Moore. He’s obviously referencing the 2011 champ BP, except BP wasn’t even in the bracket last year. In response to Moore’s statement, we’d like to take a moment to explain that our “Worst Company in America” contest exists within the context of this website, which is about consumers and their relationship to the marketplace and to businesses. Just to be clear: The point of this contest, now in its 8th year, is to enable consumers to send a message to a company that provides goods or services to them. Winning this contest means your customers are trying to tell you something. And that something is that you, out of all the companies, most deserve a plastic poop trophy.
Mr. Moore continues, “The complaints against us last year were our support of SOPA (not true), and that they didn’t like the ending to Mass Effect 3.”
REALITY CHECK
Actually, our analysis of the reasons for EA’s inclusion in last year’s finale makes no mention of Mass Effect 3 or SOPA. Instead, it looks at EA’s history of buying up smaller, successful developers with the intention of milking — and arguably ruining — the intellectual properties that made these acquired companies so attractive. It also discusses EA’s exclusivity deals on popular sports games, that some say effectively sets the bar for retail prices for the rest of the gaming industry.
Then there’s the issue of microtransactions, in-game purchases that EA has made no secret are at the center of its business model. Many customers believe that EA’s view of microtransactions isn’t to simply charge customers a little bit of money for something that is additional, but not integral, to the core game, but rather to put out broken or deliberately incomplete games with the ultimate goal of selling add-on content that should have been included in the $60 price tag to begin with.
In today’s post, Moore contends that microtransactions are okey-dokey because “tens of millions” of people are enjoying EA’s free-to-play games that include microtransactions. We’d counter that just because people are allowing you to nickel-and-dime them it doesn’t mean you should be doing it.
And since Moore brought up Mass Effect 3, let’s take a brief look at that problematic title. Eager to cash in on a hugely successful franchise, EA rushed out the third and final installment of the series in 2012. Many users had spent years playing Mass Effect and developing a history and connections with other characters that carry through all three games, that is until the very end, which landed with a mammoth, unsatisfying thud for an awful lot of people who had paid nearly $200 (or more) for these games.
By all appearances, this wasn’t a case of a movie director having a different vision from his/her audience, or a novelist choosing to take a story off in an unexpected direction. For many people, it felt like having the plug pulled on a really good concert just as their favorite song was getting started, and it reeked of being a business decision on EA’s part, rather than a complete artistic disaster like, *cough* the finale of Lost.
We wonder how Moore would feel if he spent at least $180 on something that failed to deliver what it had been promising for years?
In the end, EA effectively admitted ME3 was incomplete when it released a “extended cut” ending to mollify the angry crowd.
SHIFTING THE BLAME
Moore even admits that EA has made some pretty bad boners in recent years:
I’ll be the first to admit that we’ve made plenty of mistakes. These include server shut downs too early, games that didn’t meet expectations, missteps on new pricing models and most recently, severely fumbling the launch of SimCity. We owe gamers better performance than this.​
 

Psychopath

Plata O Plomo
Dec 28, 2008
17,710
3,348
393
hell
#2
Article continued.
As for more recent accusations, Moore tries to shrug off the always-online requirement for SimCity 5 that not only made the game unplayable (because EA didn’t have the foresight to think people might want to play the game after they bought it), but also pissed off a lot of people who felt that it was an invasive form of digital rights management (DRM) that assumes users are trying to play pirated versions of the game.
“Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme,” writes Moore. “It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period.”
Actually, you could be clearer. Make it optional and maybe people will believe you.
And then there is this:
“We’ve seen mailing lists that direct people to vote for EA because they disagree with the choice of the cover athlete on Madden NFL,” writes Moore. “Yes, really.”
Really? Show us. Because while readers certainly complained about the declining quality of Madden, not a single person griped to us about the player(s) on the box cover.
Regardless, all of these concerns are apparently not the real reason that EA is once again heading toward a possible WCIA victory. No, says Moore, it’s homophobia.
Yes. Homophobia.
WAIT. WHAT?
Moore contends that EA’s decision to allow users to create lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) characters in some of its games has resulted in a voting campaign orchestrated by those opposed to portrayals of LGBT characters in games:
“In the past year, we have received thousands of emails and postcards protesting against EA for allowing players to create LGBT characters in our games. This week, we’re seeing posts on conservative web sites urging people to protest our LGBT policy by voting EA the Worst Company in America.”​
If there is such a campaign, the people involved in it have not reached out to us, nor have we seen evidence of this traffic to our pages. While any number of tech and video game sites and forums have been writing about and linking to the WCIA polls (here’s lookin’ at you /v/), our analytics show absolutely no incoming traffic from anything we’d label as political, let alone conservative.
EA received hundreds of nominations from Consumerist readers this year, by far the most of any contender in the bracket, but not a single one mentioned anything about sexual orientation. Consumerist does not condone homophobia or hate speech of any kind, and our readers understand the Worst Company contest and nominate businesses based on their merits.
BLOWN OPPORTUNITY
In coming out and responding to its previous win — and possible repeat victory — EA had the opportunity to show the gaming community the respect it deserves, but instead has insulted its intelligence by asking it to accept that its quite obvious faults are really just minor problems and that the actual source of trouble are faceless, homophobic hatemongers.
A sampling of gamers’ reactions to Moore’s post indicate to us that EA has only done itself a disservice by trying to pin its own high-profile problems on homophobia and whiny gamers. These people are EA’s customers.
Writes Joystiq commenter paladriver:
I don’t dislike EA because they are pro-LGBT. In fact I am supporter of LGBT rights. I dislike EA because they have a long standing history of anti-consumer practices. Not liking EA does not make me anti-LGBT, it makes me anti-EA.​
On the same story, reader HeavyAttack adds:
“Trying to claim that the people who voted for them are simply homophobes is a bit sleazy. I didn’t vote because it’s a meaningless poll, and all companies are evil, but EA has done plenty of shitty things, and it seems like voting them the worst company in America is the only way to get them to acknowledge those things. That, however, still puts them ahead of other companies. They at least acknowledged that they fucked up.”​
GoodNewsJimDotCom writes on Slashdot:
“I think it is pretty sinister for him to dredge up “US vs THEM” protesting in his “apology.” Remember, one thing EA does is to hire fake protestors to get controversy for their game! Stay classy EA. Even in your apologies, you ooze evil.”​
And then there’s Xdeser2 who comments on this Escapist story:
NO EA! You do not get to Spin the story and take the Moral high ground on this shit! Don’t try to fool people by lumping these intolerant assholes with the people actually making legitimate complaints against your practices. You don’t get to try to make yourself look progressive like that.​
GETTING NO RESPECT
Gaming might be a multibillion-dollar industry that attracts the world’s biggest names in entertainment, music, and sports, but it is nonetheless treated by both the media and the business world with a reductionist shrug. Companies like EA are happy to foster the misinformed perception of your average “gamer” as a whiny, nitpicky loner who will complain about anything, as that image only helps to discredit those who have a valid complaint about a relatively pricey consumer product.
Here’s our question to Peter Moore: If your entire industry is engaged in the production of something so trivial as to not warrant inclusion in a contest that features a poop trophy, why do you even work in it?
 

fletcher

Darkness always says hello.
Donator
Feb 20, 2006
59,552
19,736
513
jersey
#3
Fuck EA and their shitty business practices. They did it to themselves.
 

Neon

ネオン
Donator
Mar 23, 2008
51,782
18,529
513
Kingdom of Charis
#4
OK, now that was a severe tactical error. What mister idiot doesn't realize is that his target audience ALL KNOW that the internet is abuzz with how fucked EA and Sim City 5 are. They are already computer gamers with access to the internet (They have to because of YOUR Always Online requirements, moron), and they've seen all the mods that do it better than the original, they've seen the horrific response to the criticism, they've seen EA's CEO forced out of the fucking company over this. None of them, not ONE, will buy that this is about homophobia, and since the gaming community is by and large way more socially liberal, you are actually offending most of your customers by insinuating that their hatred of your business practices is homophobic.

Somebody hire this guy a PR firm. Yikes.
 

Don the Radio Guy

G-Bb-A-D
Donator
Mar 30, 2006
69,628
5,081
568
Wyoming
#6
I assume they're talking about the same sex relationships in SWTOR. Which the fans have been overwhelmingly demanding for over a year. They finally added them in the new expansion.

Behind a pay wall.

If homophobia is to blame it's on the part of EA.
 

Psychopath

Plata O Plomo
Dec 28, 2008
17,710
3,348
393
hell
#7
OK, now that was a severe tactical error. What mister idiot doesn't realize is that his target audience ALL KNOW that the internet is abuzz with how fucked EA and Sim City 5 are. They are already computer gamers with access to the internet (They have to because of YOUR Always Online requirements, moron), and they've seen all the mods that do it better than the original, they've seen the horrific response to the criticism, they've seen EA's CEO forced out of the fucking company over this. None of them, not ONE, will buy that this is about homophobia, and since the gaming community is by and large way more socially liberal, you are actually offending most of your customers by insinuating that their hatred of your business practices is homophobic.

Somebody hire this guy a PR firm. Yikes.
I agree with everything you just posted. What I find funny is that they are going to take the title of worst company in America for the second year in a row and this jerkoff is blaming the customers. The people who buy his products are being blamed for his companies own idiocy and anti consumer business model. What a jizz bucket.
 

Psychopath

Plata O Plomo
Dec 28, 2008
17,710
3,348
393
hell
#8
Gaming executives really should use their own product.
I really wish the gaming industry would go back to the way it was in the 90's where it was focused on the product and not how much money the consumer can be milked out of.
 

Gorilla Pimp

Popped a molly i'm sweatin, WOO
Nov 2, 2009
3,269
640
173
Mobile, AL
#9
2k sports got the rights to make the nba games, and they do a much better job of making a solid basketball game. This is the last year EA has exclusive rights for the college football game, so I wonder if anybody else steps up to the plate next year.
 

fletcher

Darkness always says hello.
Donator
Feb 20, 2006
59,552
19,736
513
jersey
#10
2k sports got the rights to make the nba games, and they do a much better job of making a solid basketball game. This is the last year EA has exclusive rights for the college football game, so I wonder if anybody else steps up to the plate next year.
Nothing is going to change with sports franchises until EA lets go of the NFL. 2k was on their way to destroying them and putting Madden to rest till they bought the rights.
 
Dec 12, 2007
25,494
11,318
438
#12
In other news, water is wet, jews are cheap, and the sky is blue.

EA gonna EA.
 

VicVinegar

Registered User
Oct 5, 2012
1,578
636
163
#13
I stopped with EA after buying Madden and Tiger Woods '10. Madden and TW were full of ads. TW even when you would be setting up for a shot. It is one thing to put ads around the stadium and have real brand products in the golf game, but don't have some McDonald's ad campaign pop up when I am on the tee.

2010 was also the first year where course unlocks weren't unlocks anymore, but micro purchases. Including one you played as part of the "season" mode. That really was when I knew this company had turned to shit.
 

Gorilla Pimp

Popped a molly i'm sweatin, WOO
Nov 2, 2009
3,269
640
173
Mobile, AL
#14
I stopped with EA after buying Madden and Tiger Woods '10. Madden and TW were full of ads. TW even when you would be setting up for a shot. It is one thing to put ads around the stadium and have real brand products in the golf game, but don't have some McDonald's ad campaign pop up when I am on the tee.

2010 was also the first year where course unlocks weren't unlocks anymore, but micro purchases. Including one you played as part of the "season" mode. That really was when I knew this company had turned to shit.
It's not just EA though. All games are following suit. The NASCAR video game i play just released the brand new generation 6 cars on the game. And you can own them all, for the low price of something like 40 gamer points a piece. And that would be cool, if you could earn gamerpoints, instead of having to buy packets of them from microsoft.
 

LiddyRules

I'm Gonna Be The Bestest Pilot In The Whole Galaxy
Jun 1, 2005
141,477
49,800
644
#15
After reading this, I briefly looked into the Mass Effect ending. Whose fault does the shoulders lie on for that- EA or the game developers? Admittedly, I'm not into gaming, but am I incorrect in seeing EA as sort of the studio while the people writing/making the game are the production company. Did EA force it to have a lame ending or were the developers lazy and EA is taking the blame for it?
 

Guilty Spark

It's freeing and refreshing
May 4, 2005
6,353
2,191
608
Long Island NY
#16
None of this matters. Dude could say all gamers fuck their mothers and that he eats babies for breakfast. They could win this poll every year until the end of time.
Madden will still sell like gangbusters every year and this company will continue making truckloads of money.
 

fletcher

Darkness always says hello.
Donator
Feb 20, 2006
59,552
19,736
513
jersey
#17
It's not just EA though. All games are following suit. The NASCAR video game i play just released the brand new generation 6 cars on the game. And you can own them all, for the low price of something like 40 gamer points a piece. And that would be cool, if you could earn gamerpoints, instead of having to buy packets of them from microsoft.
EA publishes NASCAR games. You are dealing with the same company.
 

Gorilla Pimp

Popped a molly i'm sweatin, WOO
Nov 2, 2009
3,269
640
173
Mobile, AL
#20
Just read they lost the license years ago. Eh.
Doesn't matter though... Microsoft games do the same things with map packs. Hey we made 4 new maps for you to play on Halo, or gears of war! And we want you to play them! for 10 bucks for each available DLC.

I bought Fight Night Champion(EA) as a used game for 15 bucks. When I got home with it and put it in, i had to pay an extra 10 bucks to use it online.
 

Yesterdays Hero

She's better than you, Smirkalicious.
Jan 25, 2007
16,386
3,922
571
Canada. Land of the Fat.
#21
After reading this, I briefly looked into the Mass Effect ending. Whose fault does the shoulders lie on for that- EA or the game developers? Admittedly, I'm not into gaming, but am I incorrect in seeing EA as sort of the studio while the people writing/making the game are the production company. Did EA force it to have a lame ending or were the developers lazy and EA is taking the blame for it?
The ending to ME3, and the clusterfuck of merch needed between ME2 and ME3, was the fault of EA. Bioware Edmonton hammered the game out, but EA disliked the ending that was in the works. So they had Bioware alter it to taste.

Exact same thing happened with Dragon Age to Dragon Age 2. EA adds developers to the studios, and refuses to leave shit alone.

The result is a company (EA) that does not give a fuck what gamers in general think, as they're still making retarded money off their chain franchise games (Sports being a big one). Until gamers decide to stay away from EA products, this trend (and microtransaction whoring) will continue, and get worse. For the lamenting that a section of people give, way more are into it.

Honestly best to stay with the generation of games before things shit the bed.
 

Gorilla Pimp

Popped a molly i'm sweatin, WOO
Nov 2, 2009
3,269
640
173
Mobile, AL
#22
I will say this... I loved Dead Space and Dead Space 2, and those are both EA games.
 

ruckstande

Posts mostly from the shitter.
Apr 2, 2005
14,886
4,429
678
South Jersey
#23
Mass Effect 2 epic, ME3 fucking sucked. I started playing it and stopped about an hour in. Took me months to play it again. Loved Dead Space but got bored with 2. Command and Conquer was a great series that got terrible as time went on. Stopped playing that a long while ago.
 
Dec 12, 2007
25,494
11,318
438
#24
After reading this, I briefly looked into the Mass Effect ending. Whose fault does the shoulders lie on for that- EA or the game developers? Admittedly, I'm not into gaming, but am I incorrect in seeing EA as sort of the studio while the people writing/making the game are the production company. Did EA force it to have a lame ending or were the developers lazy and EA is taking the blame for it?
EA is very very famous for rushing it's publishers to the starting gate when they're not ready. So games with bugs and unfinished parts are very common for them. When they purchased Bioware after mass effect 2 people knew it was a turn for the worst.

Dragon Age 2 was the first victim of their meddling.
 

LiddyRules

I'm Gonna Be The Bestest Pilot In The Whole Galaxy
Jun 1, 2005
141,477
49,800
644
#25
Thanks for the answers Yesterdays Hero and DR. Jimcy M.E. And I would be pissed if the ending to something that I had spent years following said "buy more shit."