Get woke go broke

A thing that just about all of the wokester/brokster journalisming.com places had in common was unions.

Of course all of of these socialist assholes scrambled to unionize back in the salad days when they thought the wokescold news was a viable business model, and of course they refuse to understand that the unions only pushed them off a cliff and into "learn to code" obsolescence that much faster.



If, by some miracle, any of these laid off journalismists managed to get hired by another media outlet, you know they'd again scramble to form a union and commie their shit fucked yet again.

Fucking untrainables.
HuffPo layoffs give me a pop-tent
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator
I would love to ask a HuffPo union person "What good is a union when your employer is going under because of your own shit woke journalism pandering only to a handful of people on twitter".
"Unions are great, because they get you a paltry severance payout when your ass gets thrown out the door for being an overpaid boat anchor because of the union."

Stupid California(of course) is set to pass a law which will lock out freelance(non-union) writers, in an effort to force media companies to use union employees.

And they are truly too stupid to see how it is obviously going to backfire spectacularly.
 
"Unions are great, because they get your a paltry severance payout when your ass gets thrown out the door for being an overpaid boat anchor because of the union."

Stupid California(of course) is set to pass a law which will lock out freelance(non-union) writers, in an effort to force media companies to use union employees.

And they are truly too stupid to see how it is obviously going to backfire spectacularly.
Was just reading about that. Yeah limited to 30 articles a year or something as freelance.
Cali is a liberal shithole anyway, where giving someone a puddle of AIDS intentionally, is only a slap on the wrist, cos apparently, gays giving each other AIDS knowingly and getting locked up for it, "is disproportionately unfair to gays" went the political argument :rolleyes: ie, "more gays than straights give each other aids intentionally, well that is not fair so lets lower the punishment" #calilogic
 

SatansCheerledr

Ideologically Unsound
"Unions are great, because they get you a paltry severance payout when your ass gets thrown out the door for being an overpaid boat anchor because of the union."

Stupid California(of course) is set to pass a law which will lock out freelance(non-union) writers, in an effort to force media companies to use union employees.

And they are truly too stupid to see how it is obviously going to backfire spectacularly.
I don't think they really care. Got to pander to the libtards to get them votes.
 

Floyd1977

Registered User
"Unions are great, because they get your a paltry severance payout when your ass gets thrown out the door for being an overpaid boat anchor because of the union."

Stupid California(of course) is set to pass a law which will lock out freelance(non-union) writers, in an effort to force media companies to use union employees.

And they are truly too stupid to see how it is obviously going to backfire spectacularly.
https://nypost.com/2019/10/26/why-californias-ab-5-is-a-threat-to-the-american-way-of-life/

though odds are they are a group that vote democrat and will continue to do so. Like I said in one of the other threads, you can fuck with their livelyhoods all you want, but very few will actually #walkaway.
 
"Unions are great, because they get you a paltry severance payout when your ass gets thrown out the door for being an overpaid boat anchor because of the union."

Stupid California(of course) is set to pass a law which will lock out freelance(non-union) writers, in an effort to force media companies to use union employees.

And they are truly too stupid to see how it is obviously going to backfire spectacularly.
I wonder if that's an offshoot of the SAG and AFTRA laws where they try to keep the average schmos out and keep their circle tight.
 

Atomic Fireball

Well-Known Member
Donator


Wh-why do I have to write about sports? Drrrruuuummmmpppphhhhh!

"Gawker Media Group Union" - bwah haw haw I love when they eat each other



Gawker
Deadspin
- neutered
io9
Jezebel
Kotaku
 

mascan42

Registered User


Wh-why do I have to write about sports? Drrrruuuummmmpppphhhhh!

"Gawker Media Group Union" - bwah haw haw I love when they eat each other



Gawker
Deadspin
- neutered
io9
Jezebel
Kotaku
I'm hearing that Kotaku got a similar "stay in your lane" memo, so I'm betting this is company-wide.
 

the max

attempted murder? now honestly, what is that?
Yeah whichever company bought whatever was left after gawker died told all of their sites that they needed to "stick to sports".

It's been pretty entertaining these people acting as though there's a dearth of outlets for FuckTrump and hating white people; apparently being told to shut the fuck up and actually write about what they were hired to write about is akin to breaking their hands so they can't journalize.
 

BIV

I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.
The Kotaku counts have been posting cryptic messages. They are all outraged, of course.

Hopefully Schreier will quit in solidarity.
 

Atomic Fireball

Well-Known Member
Donator




https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment...F-0zNBi9dyRGTCBMZyOlk6zu9Lf_3b7I&guccounter=2

This is the seed of a brilliant science fiction idea - What if women had a way to nullify the natural physical superiority which men possess that allows them to intimidate and dominate the female sex?

But the electric-bolts-shooting-out-of-their-fingers idea seems far-fetched and would imply a lot of collateral damage. Here's a better idea - what if women could possess an object that they could hold in one hand, that could propel a lead projectile into the body of a physically-stronger attacker? Think of what a game-changer that would be!

Adapted for screen by Alderman, who is working alongside an all-female writers’ room
Yay wahmen! Yay Amazon! The best way to assemble a writing team for compelling TV is by careful attention to the sex and race and orientation of the writers. These are in no way psychopaths obsessed with the idea of killing men.
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator




https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment...F-0zNBi9dyRGTCBMZyOlk6zu9Lf_3b7I&guccounter=2

This is the seed of a brilliant science fiction idea - What if women had a way to nullify the natural physical superiority that men possess that allows them to intimidate and dominate the female sex?

But the electric-bolts-shooting-out-of-their-fingers idea seems far-fetched and would imply a lot of collateral damage. Here's a better idea - what if women could possess an object that they could hold in one hand, that could propel a lead projectile into the body of a physically-stronger attacker? Think of what a game-changer that would be!



Yay wahmen! Yay Amazon! The best way to assemble a writer team for compelling TV is by careful attention to the sex and race and orientation of the writers. These are in no way psychopaths obsessed with the idea of killing men.
This will be a smash hit with the coveted "Lonely, Bitter Man-Hating Cat Lady Spinster" demographic.
 

SatansCheerledr

Ideologically Unsound
And of course, it will get a 100 critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
does anyone ever take critics reviews into consideration? Especially when it comes to comedy or horror movies, those pretentious fucks don't have a clue.
 

Atomic Fireball

Well-Known Member
Donator
If you don't actively resist Nazis then you yourself are a Nazi.
Nazi.



Reminder that fascism is a collaboration between an authoritarian government and big business.
 
Last edited:
It’s too early for math
CETOUTE - ETOE = CUNT :p




https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment...F-0zNBi9dyRGTCBMZyOlk6zu9Lf_3b7I&guccounter=2

This is the seed of a brilliant science fiction idea - What if women had a way to nullify the natural physical superiority which men possess that allows them to intimidate and dominate the female sex?

But the electric-bolts-shooting-out-of-their-fingers idea seems far-fetched and would imply a lot of collateral damage. Here's a better idea - what if women could possess an object that they could hold in one hand, that could propel a lead projectile into the body of a physically-stronger attacker? Think of what a game-changer that would be!



Yay wahmen! Yay Amazon! The best way to assemble a writing team for compelling TV is by careful attention to the sex and race and orientation of the writers. These are in no way psychopaths obsessed with the idea of killing men.

Makes me laugh does this plot :D

Women are bullied and attacked by other women FAR more than they are by men. Women are far more vindictive than men, on average.

If women had this power to electrocute, the smell of fried snatch would be everywhere, as they fought and fried each other over men they wanted.
 
Top