Islamic State Issues Fatwa On How To Properly R8pe Enslaved Women, Girls

#1
Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when "owners" of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.

The ruling or fatwa has the force of law and appears to go beyond the Islamic State's previous known utterances on the subject, a leading Islamic State scholar said. It sheds new light on how the group is trying to reinterpret centuries-old teachings to justify the sexual slavery of women in the swaths of Syria and Iraq it controls.

To read the fatwa, click here.

The fatwa was among a huge trove of documents captured by U.S. Special Operations Forces during a raid targeting a top Islamic State official in Syria in May. Reuters has reviewed some of the documents, which have not been previously published.

Among the religious rulings are bans on a father and son having sex with the same female slave; and the owner of a mother and daughter having sex with both. Joint owners of a female captive are similarly enjoined from intercourse because she is viewed as "part of a joint ownership."

The United Nations and human rights groups have accused the Islamic State of the systematic abduction and **** of thousands of women and girls as young as 12, especially members of the Yazidi minority in northern Iraq. Many have been given to fighters as a reward or sold as sex slaves.

Far from trying to conceal the practice, Islamic State has boasted about it and established a department of "war spoils" to manage slavery. Reuters reported on the existence of the department on Monday.

In an April report, Human Rights Watch interviewed 20 female escapees who recounted how Islamic State fighters separated young women and girls from men and boys and older women. They were moved "in an organized and methodical fashion to various places in Iraq and Syria." They were then sold or given as gifts and repeatedly raped or subjected to sexual violence.

DOS AND DON'TS

Fatwa No. 64, dated Jan. 29, 2015, and issued by Islamic State's Committee of Research and Fatwas, appears to codify sexual relations between IS fighters and their female captives for the first time, going further than a pamphlet issued by the group in 2014 on how to treat slaves.

The fatwa starts with a question: "Some of the brothers have committed violations in the matter of the treatment of the female slaves. These violations are not permitted by Sharia law because these rules have not been dealt with in ages. Are there any warnings pertaining to this matter?"

It then lists 15 injunctions, which in some instances go into explicit detail. For example:

"If the owner of a female captive, who has a daughter suitable for intercourse, has sexual relations with the latter, he is not permitted to have intercourse with her mother and she is permanently off limits to him. Should he have intercourse with her mother then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her daughter and she is to be off limits to him."

Islamic State's sexual exploitation of female captives has been well documented, but a leading IS expert at Princeton University, Cole Bunzel, who has reviewed many of the group's writings, said the fatwa went beyond what has previously been published by the militants on how to treat female slaves.

"It reveals the actual concerns of IS slave owners," he said in an email.

Still, he cautioned that not "everything dealt with in the fatwa is indicative of a relevant violation. It doesn't mean father and son were necessarily sharing a girl. They're at least being 'warned' not to. But I bet some of these violations were being committed."

The fatwa also instructs owners of female slaves to "show compassion towards her, be kind to her, not humiliate her, and not assign her work she is unable to perform." An owner should also not sell her to an individual whom he knows will mistreat her.

Professor Abdel Fattah Alawari, dean of Islamic Theology at Al-Azhar University, a 1,000-year-old Egyptian center for Islamic learning, said Islamic State "has nothing to do with Islam" and was deliberately misreading centuries-old verses and sayings that were originally designed to end, rather than encourage, slavery.

"Islam preaches freedom to slaves, not slavery. Slavery was the status quo when Islam came around," he said. "Judaism, Christianity, Greek, Roman, and Persian civilizations all practiced it and took the females of their enemies as sex slaves. So Islam found this abhorrent practice and worked to gradually remove it.”

In September 2014 more than 120 Islamic scholars from around the world issued an open letter to IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi refuting the group's religious arguments to justify many of its actions. The scholars noted that the "reintroduction of slavery is forbidden in Islam."
Link

"Islam preaches freedom to slaves, not slavery. Slavery was the status quo when Islam came around," he said. "Judaism, Christianity, Greek, Roman, and Persian civilizations all practiced it and took the females of their enemies as sex slaves. So Islam found this abhorrent practice and worked to gradually remove it.”

 

JonBenetRamsey

well shit the bed
#6
It's good to see ethics in slavery. Good on you progressive Islam.
 

Ballbuster1

In The Danger Zone...
Wackbag Staff
#9
Nothing to see here. Religion of peace, blah, blah...
 
#10
"Islam preaches freedom to slaves, not slavery. Slavery was the status quo when Islam came around," he said. "Judaism, Christianity, Greek, Roman, and Persian civilizations all practiced it and took the females of their enemies as sex slaves. So Islam found this abhorrent practice and worked to gradually remove it.”

In September 2014 more than 120 Islamic scholars from around the world issued an open letter to IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi refuting the group's religious arguments to justify many of its actions. The scholars noted that the "reintroduction of slavery is forbidden in Islam."
They end the **** article with a pro Islam statement. I wonder if they did the same with the boy fucking scandals with the catholic church.
 

BIV

I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.
#11
They end the **** article with a pro Islam statement. I wonder if they did the same with the boy fucking scandals with the catholic church.
Why would the Catholic Church end an article with a pro Islam statement?
 

MrAbovePar

En Taro Anthony
#12
They end the **** article with a pro Islam statement. I wonder if they did the same with the boy fucking scandals with the catholic church.
And it's utterly untrue.

The first Islamic country to ban slavery did so after the bulk of the world banned it.
 

MrAbovePar

En Taro Anthony
#16
Anyone ever have the feeling that Islamic Law seems to just be the arbitrary negotiated rulings of some retard? It's like it tries to seem logical and reasoned but it completely makes no sense as apparently Allah could not predict these incongruities. Like as if the rules were made up on the fly by a crazed illiterate desert nomad.
 

gleet

What's black and white and red all over?
#17
Anyone ever have the feeling that Islamic Law seems to just be the arbitrary negotiated rulings of some retard? It's like it tries to seem logical and reasoned but it completely makes no sense as apparently Allah could not predict these incongruities. Like as if the rules were made up on the fly by a crazed illiterate desert nomad.
bye

 

Nick the Pig

Scraping a dull comment across your tender eyeball
#19
What am I missing that explains why that one guy is holding a sign about the Fanastic Four? Is that photoshopped for some reason or did he just show up at the wrong protest?
 

MrAbovePar

En Taro Anthony
#20
What am I missing that explains why that one guy is holding a sign about the Fanastic Four? Is that photoshopped for some reason or did he just show up at the wrong protest?
British Muslims call the terrorists who were behind the 7/7 attack the "Fantastic Four"
 

domelogic

Registered User
#22
Someone needs to explain the definition of adultery. Islam is definitely against it but when you have a slave it is ok, got it. Reading that put me in the game of thrones era.
 
#23
Someone needs to explain the definition of adultery. Islam is definitely against it but when you have a slave it is ok, got it. Reading that put me in the game of thrones era.
If I get to choose my slave, then I for one welcome our new Islamic overlords.
 

Nick the Pig

Scraping a dull comment across your tender eyeball
#25
British Muslims call the terrorists who were behind the 7/7 attack the "Fantastic Four"
Ah, very interesting. The best I could think was that it had something to do with the human torch and the invisible woman but your explanation makes more sense. Thanks for the info.
 
Top