Discussion in 'Movies & TV' started by mascan42, Mar 27, 2012.
Hanoi Jane playing Mrs. Reagan? Something is definitely wrong about that...
She's 74 years old and doesn't have many years left. Next.
I'd still hit it.
In related news, Leni Riefenstal's decomposing corpse to direct "Schindler's List" remake.
Ronald Reagan was a conservative?
That traitor should never play anyone associated with the presidency, period.
I gotta think this was deliberate to generate buzz. They may even eventually can her. Maybe that was the plan to begin with...
I'm sure Ms. Fonda's portrayal will be even-handed and fair.
Yes. That was sarcastic. How did I do?
Is it an attempt to generate buzz? Obviously. They haven't even (last I heard) cast the lead yet, but they've cast Jane as Nancy. They're doing this to get some heat for this movie, maybe even to get a few more investors involved.
Whatever. Should that cunt be involved in this project? Of course not. Will the movie bomb in the box office? Of course it will. But this will manage to get a few bleeding heart fags to invest some cash in a doomed film project, which is the entire point of all of this. It's not like the director or producers who cast Jane for this role will actually lose money on this shit, or that Jane won't make her payday with this boondoggle: the investors they scam into putting up money for this thing will. Which is great: rich liberal douchebags calculatingly scamming other rich liberal douchebags while protesting "the 1%" makes me laugh.
There is only one performance of Nancy Reagan, or Ronald for that matter, to which I give any attention.
Does this news bother me? No. Do I care about the casting? No.
It came through loud and clear over the telegraph