Judge Who Lost Pant Suit Loses Job


What's black and white and red all over?
Jul 24, 2005

Roy L. Pearson Jr., the administrative law judge who lost his $54 million lawsuit against a Northeast Washington dry cleaner, lost his job yesterday and was ordered to vacate his office, sources said.

Pearson, 57, who had served as a judge for two years, was up for a 10-year term at the Office of Administrative Hearings, but a judicial committee last week voted against reappointing him.

The panel had a seven-page letter hand-delivered to Pearson about 3:30 p.m., directing him to leave his office by 5 p.m. Pearson's term ended in May, at the height of his battle with the dry cleaners. Since then, he has remained on the payroll, making $100,000 a year as an attorney adviser.

A source familiar with the committee's meetings said Pearson's lawsuit played little role in the decision not to reappoint him.

Instead, the committee said it had reviewed Pearson's judicial decisions and audiotapes of proceedings over which he had presided and found he did not demonstrate "appropriate judgment and judicial temperament," according a source who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the case.

Sources said Pearson also was criticized for displaying a "combative" nature with supervisors and colleagues and for failing to comply with policies in drafting opinions....

I had never actually seen a picture of him. He sounded... so much taller on the bench.


Crinkle Crinkle!
Dec 10, 2004
Since then, he has remained on the payroll, making $100,000 a year as an attorney adviser.
Thankfully, he was finally able to afford a new pair of pants on that salary.


I'm bi-winning.
Jan 9, 2006
....and all is right with the universe again.

Thank god.


There's nothing quite like a shorn scrotum.
Nov 12, 2004
But didn't the couple who owned the dry cleaners go bankrupt? This ass deserves worse!