Little Yimmy's weight

devoidzer0

Registered User
Mar 14, 2012
162
32
198
#1
On Joe Rogan's podcast, Jim said he was currently around 146 pounds, and that he was over 180 at his heaviest. The IMDB lists his height at 5'7". To me 146 is quite underweight for this height. I'm 5'6" and consider my "fighting weight" around 170.

Does Yimmy just have a really small frame or is he shorter than 5'7"? Anyone who has met him in person, feel free to contribute. Douchey minds want to know.
 

Hog's Big Ben

Getting ass-***** in The Octagon, brother.
Donator
Jul 28, 2005
28,261
18,412
693
New York
#4
To me 146 is quite underweight for this height.
I've bolded the part of your sentence where there's a problem. See, you're an idiot. 120 isn't even underweight for that height. Be less of a fat American.
 

devoidzer0

Registered User
Mar 14, 2012
162
32
198
#5
I've bolded the part of your sentence where there's a problem. See, you're an idiot. 120 isn't even underweight for that height. Be less of a fat American.
You're an idiot for believing in the BMI chart. It's an embarrassingly inaccurate way to determine obesity.
 

Hog's Big Ben

Getting ass-***** in The Octagon, brother.
Donator
Jul 28, 2005
28,261
18,412
693
New York
#6
You're an idiot for believing in the BMI chart. It's an embarrassingly inaccurate way to determine obesity.
Says the 170 pound midget.

Besides, I was using it to determine the opposite of obesity. Go have another cheeseburger, Tiny.
 

Frankie_b

Talk softly and drive a big tank!
Aug 31, 2009
12,720
6,534
423
Scotland
#7
Says the 170 pound midget.

Besides, I was using it to determine the opposite of obesity. Go have another cheeseburger, Tiny.
I may be wrong here but isnt the medical term 'manlet' ?
 

devoidzer0

Registered User
Mar 14, 2012
162
32
198
#8
Says the 170 pound midget.

Besides, I was using it to determine the opposite of obesity. Go have another cheeseburger, Tiny.
It fails for that too. Yes, 5'6" is a midget. You got me, and it hurts. About 10 years ago I was 300 pounds, your attempted barbs would've been a lot more effective then.
 

Hog's Big Ben

Getting ass-***** in The Octagon, brother.
Donator
Jul 28, 2005
28,261
18,412
693
New York
#9
It fails for that too. Yes, 5'6" is a midget. You got me, and it hurts. About 10 years ago I was 300 pounds, your attempted barbs would've been a lot more effective then.
Ah, perspective. No wonder you think everyone is underweight.

Gotta love Wackbag. Where else can a 5'6" guy lose 130 pounds and still be fat?
 

devoidzer0

Registered User
Mar 14, 2012
162
32
198
#10
Arnold had a BMI of 33 in this pic, and thus he was considered obese. What an accurate system.

 

Hog's Big Ben

Getting ass-***** in The Octagon, brother.
Donator
Jul 28, 2005
28,261
18,412
693
New York
#16
Arnold had a BMI of 33 in this pic, and thus he was considered obese. What an accurate system.
Wait. You mean the BMI skews people with lots of muscle as obese? Well, that's a fucking newsflash!

It also makes short people seem thinner than they really are.

Neither of those is a problem for you, though.
 

fletcher

Darkness always says hello.
Donator
Feb 20, 2006
59,523
19,737
513
jersey
#18
Can you assholes stop the faggotry and post if Jim Norton is a fatso or an anorexic already?
 

devoidzer0

Registered User
Mar 14, 2012
162
32
198
#19
Wait. You mean the BMI skews people with lots of muscle as obese? Well, that's a fucking newsflash!

It also makes short people seem thinner than they really are.

Neither of those is a problem for you, though.
It's amazing how much you know about someone you've never seen.