Man-made chemicals cited in health scourges: UN report

BIV

I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.
Apr 22, 2002
78,419
27,301
898
Seattle
#1
Thought I'd fire up the Kirk-Signal

GENEVA (Reuters) - Man-made chemicals in everyday products are likely to be at least the partial cause of a global surge in birth deformities, hormonal cancers and psychiatric diseases, a U.N.-sponsored research team reported on Tuesday.

These substances, dubbed EDCs, could also be linked to a decline in the human male sperm count and female fertility, to an increase in once-rare childhood cancers and to the disappearance of some animal species, they said.

"It is clear that some of these chemical pollutants can affect the endocrinal (hormonal) system and ....may also interfere with the development processes of humans and wildlife species," the report declared.

The international group, academic experts working under the umbrella of the United Nations environmental and health agencies UNEP and WHO, issued their findings in a paper updating a 2002 study on the potential dangers of synthetic chemicals.

Declaring "a global threat that needs to be resolved," the team said humans and animals across the planet were probably exposed to hundreds of these often little-studied or understood compounds at any one time.

"We live in a world in which man-made chemicals have become part of everyday life," said their 28-page report, "State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals, 2012," issued as a policy guide for governments.

EDCs include phthalates long used in making plastics soft and flexible. Products made from them include toys, children's dummies, perfumes and pharmaceuticals, as well as cosmetics like deodorants that are absorbed into the body.

Another is Bisphenol A, or BPA, which is used to harden plastics and is found in food and beverage containers, including some babies' bottles and the coating of food cans.

A few countries - including the United States, Canada and some European Union members - have already banned the use of some of them in certain products, especially those destined for the use of children.

But, the report said, "many hundreds of thousands" are in use around the world and only a small fraction had been assessed for their potential to spark disease by upsetting the endocrinal, or hormonal, systems of humans and animals.

Experts believe that in general, such chemicals can be absorbed into drinks and food from the containers they come in.

COMPONENTS NOT IDENTIFIED

The team, created by a 17-year-old chemical management body called the IOMC working with a range of U.N. agencies, said a key problem was that manufacturers of consumer products did not identify many of their chemical components.

Consequently, the researchers said, they had only been able to look at "the tip of the iceberg". Disease risk from the use of EDCs - or what could be even more dangerous a combination of them - "may be significantly underestimated."

Using studies of the effect of the chemicals on humans and animals, the team added, a link to EDCs could be suspected in breast and prostate cancer, diabetes, infertility, asthma, obesity, strokes, and Alzheimer and Parkinson's diseases.

Babies exposed to EDCs in the womb or in puberty, these studies suggested, were especially vulnerable to developing these diseases in later life as well as behavioral and learning problems like dyslexia as children.

In many countries, these disorders affected 5-10 percent of babies born, while autism was now recorded at a rate of one percent. Childhood leukemia and brain cancer is also on the rise, according to the report.

"All of these complex non-communicable diseases have both a genetic and an environmental component," it said.

"Since the increases in incidence and prevalence cannot be due solely to genetics, it is important to focus on understanding the contribution of the environment to these chronic disease trends in humans."

The researchers said their report had been based largely on studies in the developed world. But the size of the problem in developing countries had yet to be adequately assessed due to a lack of data from Africa, Asia and Latin America.

(Reported by Robert Evans; Editing by Mark Heinrich)
http://news.yahoo.com/man-made-chem...1lBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25zBHRlc3QDVGVzdF9BRkM-;_ylv=3
 

Neon

ネオン
Donator
Mar 23, 2008
51,774
18,521
513
Kingdom of Charis
#2
The world is, by and large, healthier than it has ever been in history by miles and miles. Any dangers posed by the abundance of chemical substances (which I am sure there are) are well balanced out by modern medicine and overall better nutrition (for the most part. Not talking about rural China or sub-Saharan Africa). 300 years ago there were no chemicals in the water, but drinking it could (and often did) kill you due to natural contaminants and parasites before you died at the ripe old age of 45 anyway.
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator
Mar 10, 2006
48,376
36,387
628
In a porn tree
#3
These substances, dubbed EDCs, could also be linked to a decline in the human male sperm count and female fertility

Another is Bisphenol A, or BPA, which is used to harden plastics and is found in food and beverage containers, including some babies' bottles and the coating of food cans.
BPA first started being used in beverage containers in the 1950s.

There are over 4.5 billion more people on the Earth now than there were in 1950.

Clearly we have to ban this BPA before the human race goes extinct.
 

mascan42

Registered User
Aug 26, 2002
18,712
5,590
768
Ronkonkoma, Long Island
#4
I also heard that lifelong exposure to random household chemicals can cause wacky housewives to shrink.

 

KRSOne

Registered User
Dec 8, 2011
12,947
2,963
258
Sunnydale
#5
We were designed to die. Something is going to kill you. If its not some kind of bacteria made by nature, its going to be the thing man created to kill the bacteria. Sure you can get rid of the BPA lined cans and then increase the risks of dying from food-borne bacteria.
 

Neon

ネオン
Donator
Mar 23, 2008
51,774
18,521
513
Kingdom of Charis
#6
We were designed to die. Something is going to kill you. If its not some kind of bacteria made by nature, its going to be the thing man created to kill the bacteria. Sure you can get rid of the BPA lined cans and then increase the risks of dying from food-borne bacteria.
Who are you and what have you done with Kirk?
 

gleet

What's black and white and red all over?
Jul 24, 2005
22,543
13,852
608
Idaho
#7
Brazilian girls got a protozoa in their brain from cat shit that makes them want to fuck. Problem?
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator
Mar 10, 2006
48,376
36,387
628
In a porn tree
#11
We were designed to die. Something is going to kill you. If its not some kind of bacteria made by nature, its going to be the thing man created to kill the bacteria. Sure you can get rid of the BPA lined cans and then increase the risks of dying from food-borne bacteria.
Look at our little boy growing up right before our eyes.

*sniff*

No no... it's just allergies.
 

Buster H

Alt-F4
Wackbag Staff
Dec 6, 2004
12,243
2,725
678
Lower Bucks Co, PA
#12
We were designed to die. Something is going to kill you. If its not some kind of bacteria made by nature, its going to be the thing man created to kill the bacteria. Sure you can get rid of the BPA lined cans and then increase the risks of dying from food-borne bacteria.
GO FUCK YOUR MOTHER AND DIE IN A FIRE!!!!!!!!!







see how ridiculous it is?
 

Norm Stansfield

私は亀が好きだ。
Mar 17, 2009
15,949
4,075
328
#13
Look at our little boy growing up right before our eyes.

*sniff*

No no... it's just allergies.
He's not growing up, he just hates the UN more than he loves telling the truf about chemicals. If this was an Alex Jones super special out of the depths of his ass investigative report, he'd be fully on board.