Mueller-palooza viewing thread

Neckbeard

I'm Team Piggy!
Donator
That not...umm..part..umm..of the scope...*mumble mumble*
Asking why everybody he worked with was somebody who hated Donald Trump, carried water for Hillary Clinton and gave a hundred thousand dollars to Obama, Hillary Clinton and the DNC was beyond his purview.

Anything that made the CIA, FBI, NSA, New York Times, Washington Post, the Obamas, The Clintons and Western intelligence agencies look bad was beyond his purview.

MUH PURVIEW
 

JoeyDVDZ

Well-Known Member
Donator
Asking why everybody he worked with was somebody who hated Donald Trump, carried water for Hillary Clinton and gave a hundred thousand dollars to Obama, Hillary Clinton and the DNC was beyond his purview.

Anything that made the CIA, FBI, NSA, New York Times, Washington Post, the Obamas, The Clintons and Western intelligence agencies look bad was beyond his purview.

MUH PURVIEW
Like I said, this type of testimony made me very happy. It put a glaring spotlight on just how one sided this whole thing was, to the point where anyone with two functional brain cells could see it.

This was NOT supposed to be a "Get Trump" investigation. This started as a Russian interference in the election investigation. (Of course, we all know this whole thing was a sham from the get, with the sole intent to take Trump down in a kangaroo court type scheme.)

Instead, based on what Mueller would NOT talk about, the world sees that this was exactly what Trump and half the country have been screaming it was all along.
 

Opie&JimmyShow

Well-Known Member
Donator
I've been thinking about how so many people like those who are on Saturday Night Live were putting all their Hope's in dreams of ending Trump's Presidency on Muller. Even going as far this past season as to write, dedicate and preform a Christmas song in his honor. It was a pathetic cringe worthy display back than. Today it is an abomination. Thank Gid for YouTube so we can relive these acts of desperation for years to come and rub them in their smug salty faces.

Sent from your Mom's box.
 

Begbie

Wackbag Generalissimo
I've been thinking about how so many people like those who are on Saturday Night Live were putting all their Hope's in dreams of ending Trump's Presidency on Muller. Even going as far this past season as to write, dedicate and preform a Christmas song in his honor. It was a pathetic cringe worthy display back than. Today it is an abomination. Thank Gid for YouTube so we can relive these acts of desperation for years to come and rub them in their smug salty faces.

Sent from your Mom's box.
Heh...there's definitely alot of great "gotcha" clips out there. I still love circling back and revisiting the Obama mic drop moment on Kimmel when he mocked Trump and claimed he would never be President. Obama has a ton of embarrassing moments, but that one is the ultimate. Had it been the other way around, YouTube would ensure that it's the most watched clip ever and it would be everywhere...even to this day. Nobody would let it down.

He was so confident that Trump would never be President...they all were. Hmmm...
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator
Heh...there's definitely alot of great "gotcha" clips out there. I still love circling back and revisiting the Obama mic drop moment on Kimmel when he mocked Trump and claimed he would never be President. Obama has a ton of embarrassing moments, but that one is the ultimate. Had it been the other way around, YouTube would ensure that it's the most watched clip ever and it would be everywhere...even to this day. Nobody would let it down.

He was so confident that Trump would never be President...they all were. Hmmm...
Pelosi's "He'll never be President. Take that to the bank" is another classic.
 

KRSOne

Registered User
The good news for Obama is republicans are garbage and will never do anything. When republicans had power they used that power to start a witch hunt into a republican president. They didn't even appoint an impartial investigator. They got a neocon who would ignore Clintons collusion with foreign actors and ignore that Obama was president during this scandal.
 

Atomic Fireball

Well-Known Member
Donator


Robert Mueller’s congressional testimony this week was revealing, but not for what it told us about the Trump campaign’s associations with Russia. In the hours and days after Mr. Mueller gave his opening statement before the House Judiciary Committee, it became clear how tenaciously many liberals and progressives are clinging to fantasy — not just that President Trump will eventually find himself impeached and removed, but also that they can advance their values by means of legal machination rather than political vision. And at a moment of intense polarization in American politics, this fantasy is especially shortsighted.

In their minds, Mr. Trump’s treasonous malfeasance — his collusion with nefarious Russian intelligence operatives and obstruction of Mr. Mueller’s investigation — is long since proven. But for some reason, it is not unanimously denounced, either by the mainstream of both parties or by the American people. Why, these liberals wonder, has everyone else not yet risen up in horror? Surely they will soon. Mr. Mueller’s “reticence,” it was argued in Salon, was actually an “eloquent” case for impeachment. Why did no one hear it? As one writer for Slate magazine put it, the task now for those with “lonely but certain knowledge” of Mr. Trump’s criminality is to try once again to get the word out.

Within hours of the release of Mr. Mueller’s report, a new strategy was born: to insist that it was as bad for the president as his enemies had always hoped. The report was an “impeachment referral” without saying so, and Mr. Mueller — far from erring or flinching — had done precisely what he needed to do to incite congressional action. Hesitating to voice their actual disappointment that Mr. Mueller had simply not come through, interpreters elevated the text to almost scriptural status, requiring proper interpretation and vulgarization for the masses: The report actually had proved Mr. Trump’s criminality, they said. If only people would read it, or listen to the dramatic readings of it, or the podcasts about it, they would see for themselves.

So many like-minded commentators spent weeks debating how precisely to question Mr. Mueller when he appeared before Congress that few noticed that if there was a game to play, it was won and lost in the organization of the hearings. Within minutes of the event’s opening on Wednesday, it became apparent that there would be no Mueller ex machina. The brevity of each Democrat’s questioning, along with Republican conspiracy-mongering and hectoring, compounded Mr. Mueller’s own limitations.
This is some masterful doublethink from the NYT. The attempted coup was a sham and a hoax, so we have to find some other way to disenfranchise the voters and remove Cheeto Benito.
 

KRSOne

Registered User

This lady makes a good point. If republicans were not so useless they would be all over the fact that the investigators have never shown any evidence of the DNC being hacked by the Russians.

Roger Stones case should be thrown out in a second when the government claims they don't have to show the evidence in court.

Roger Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server – Court Won’t Provide It Because They Don’t Have the Proof

I did see one republican bring up the fact that they have never shown any evidence that links the troll farms to the Russians.


Did anyone ask about Podesta not getting indicted even though he was involved with the same crimes as Manafort? Tucker Carlson reported Podesta was given immunity for those crimes, was that ever confirmed?
 
Top