OpieRadio Logo
Compound Media Logo
Jim Norton Logo

N.Y. Times Op-Ed bashes Obama on drone strikes for assassination

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by BIV, Jan 17, 2013.

  1. BIV

    BIV I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    77,695
    Likes Received:
    27,086
    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/...-obama-assassination-132610596--politics.html
     
  2. Party Rooster

    Party Rooster Unleash The Beast

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,304
    Likes Received:
    7,462
    God damn biased librul media!
     
  3. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,647
    Likes Received:
    18,419
    Opposing drone strikes is not a liberal notion?
     
  4. Party Rooster

    Party Rooster Unleash The Beast

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,304
    Likes Received:
    7,462
    Thatsthejoke.jpg
     
  5. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,647
    Likes Received:
    18,419
    I thought you were being ironic because they were attacking Obama.
     
  6. Party Rooster

    Party Rooster Unleash The Beast

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,304
    Likes Received:
    7,462
    I see Kirk post all the time that liberals have no problem with the drone strikes because it's Obama doing it now, when the NY Times, Washington Post and others have been pretty harsh about it the whole time.
     
  7. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,647
    Likes Received:
    18,419
    Liberals and Libertarians are the ones that I see opposing them.
     
  8. Party Rooster

    Party Rooster Unleash The Beast

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,304
    Likes Received:
    7,462
    I'm not opposed to them. Anything that lets us kill savages without risking our own soldiers' lives is a win-win in my book. I credit them for minimizing the effect and influence of al Qaeda in Yemen. Way too many of them there and impossible to get enough boots on the ground the to effectively deal with them.

    However, I don't like how the administration has "changed" the definition of enemy combatant to pad their stats and minimize the civilian casualty numbers.
     
  9. Don the Radio Guy

    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    69,628
    Likes Received:
    5,082
    As long as they're using them on bad guys, I fully support drones.
     
    Wrecktum and Psychopath like this.
  10. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,647
    Likes Received:
    18,419
    The Drone Strikes themselves don't bother me. Here's what does bother me:

    1. This administration and its supporters have the audacity to comment on the civilian casualties of Israeli airstrikes in Gaza, which are much MUCH lower than their own, instead of publicly defending Israel's decision to use precision airstrikes that produced over 99% accuracy during the recent skirmish. I'd at the very least expect the Obama administration to appreciate that kind of strategy.

    2. The vast majority of the American public seem comfortable with the idea of killing people in other countries as long as it is sanitized killing. Just like back in the "Cruise Missile" and "Smart Bomb" era, drone strikes allow Americans to ignore the ugly realities of that stuff, whereas the mere idea of "boots on the ground" causes complete apoplexy. The ugliness and necessity of killing your enemies shouldn't be something that you can easily ignore. It's serious business, shouldn't be taken lightly, and should also be understood to be a necessary evil.

    And I give Obama full kudos for going hard at some big targets. Awlaki and the rest of AQAP's command were decimated by drone strikes. But that's the stuff that a lot of his own support base doesn't appreciate.
     
  11. KRSOne

    KRSOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    12,653
    Likes Received:
    2,845
    If Bush killed 168 kids and thousands of innocent adults just to get 20 to 30 "suspects", liberals would use it as a reason to not vote for him and they would demand he be tried for war crimes. Bush water boarded suspects and the libs threw a hissy fit and wanted Bush arrested and tried and impeached and blah blah. Obama kills 50 innocent people for every one "suspect" and we don't hear them calling for war crime trials or impeachment, instead they give him 4 more years. Killing those 50 people created a lot more new enemies for the US than it takes down. If libs were against Obama drone strikes they wouldn't have voted for him. I hear Cenk talk about drone strikes and the NDAA all the time but when it came time for the elections he was campaigning every day for Obama.

    [​IMG]

    I didn't see the progressive establishment give Bush a peace prize.

    I fully expect the establishment to turn on Obama at sometime in his presidency and start pushing the next guy as our lord and savior who will make everything great.... unless he tries to repeal the 22nd to get a 3rd term.
     
    Neckbeard likes this.
  12. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,647
    Likes Received:
    18,419
    That meme is actually pretty funny.
     
    Lord Zero likes this.
  13. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    The Constitution, when it gives the President the power to lead wars. War is an activity that involves killing the enemy.

    If Americans side with any enemy Congress declared war to, the President has the power to kill them.
     
  14. KRSOne

    KRSOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    12,653
    Likes Received:
    2,845
    Has congress declared war against Pakistan, or Yemen, or Libya? I guess the NDAA did declare war against Americans by saying America is considered a battlefield.

    Senators Demand the Military Lock Up of American Citizens in a “Battlefield” They Define as Being Right Outside Your Window

    Lincoln killed a lot of Americans and they are trying to associate Obama with Lincoln.
     
  15. Lord Zero

    Lord Zero Viciously Silly

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    54,069
    Likes Received:
    12,880
    I don't like the idea of the President having a literal hit list, along with the power to have American citizens assassinated off the battlefield designated by Congress with the wave of his hand. That's way too much power.
     
    SKEPTIC likes this.
  16. SKEPTIC

    SKEPTIC Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,156
    Likes Received:
    1,856
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
     
  17. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    Al Awlaki was not a Pakistani, Yemeni, or Libyan soldier. The US war against Al Qaeda is in fact legal and authorized by Congress.

    "off the battlefield" is your spin, not fact. There is nothing in the US Constitution defining the battlefield the way you're defining it. Any objective interpretation puts the battlefield wherever the enemy happens to be. The only restriction on that is the use of the military on US soil without express congressional authorization.
     
    #17 Norm Stansfield, Jan 17, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  18. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    Yourjokemakesnosense.jpg.

    The liberal media is biased against anyone who defends the United States in any way, including Obama. This article is perfectly in line with their bias.
     
  19. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,055
    Likes Received:
    8,323
    <tinfoilhatDon>We need to oppose drone strikes because they won't be satisfied with just using them against non-Americans. Wait until you start rising up against the government!</tinfoilhatDon>
     
  20. Don the Radio Guy

    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    69,628
    Likes Received:
    5,082
    You joke, but of course they'll be used if the shit hits the fan.
     
  21. KRSOne

    KRSOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    12,653
    Likes Received:
    2,845
    So if they want to attack something they can just say that Al Qaeda is there and that will make it ok? Why did our government send support to Al Qaeda rebels in Libya and Syria? Shouldn't they have backed Gaddafi and Assad if Al Qaeda is the boogeyman?
     
  22. Lord Zero

    Lord Zero Viciously Silly

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    54,069
    Likes Received:
    12,880
    First, the area of operations is to be defined in the declaration of war which must be approved by Congress. Secondly, you're not seeing my point. The President should not (and does not) have the authority to snap his fingers and make people disappear anywhere in the world except here. I've had enough of that executive ego trip. The President is not a fucking warlord, nor is he a king or an emperor. He shouldn't be able to just do as he pleases, even in the realm of war. It's stupid to say otherwise. The powers of the Presidency need to be as tightly controlled just as the rest of the government's power should be. You can talk about terrorists all you want, but the United States government and its chief executive pose a much more potent and immediate threat than al-Qaeda. Fighting terrorism has been the excuse our government has used to justify it's latest power-grabbing sprees. Allowing the President to play god with our enemies is just another chapter of that book and will one day be turned against the people of the United States.
     
  23. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    Where are you getting this from? There's nothing that says that, in the Constitution. The constitution grants Congress the power to declare war. That's it. It says nothing about any area of operations. The US has fought a global war before, this isn't the first time.
    War is two sides trying to systematically kill each other. The President is the commander of one of those sides. The whole purpose of his title as Commander in Chief is to lead the effort to KILL all enemies.

    If he can't do that, what could it possibly mean for Congress to declare war? There is no other possible interpretation of that phrase, except that Congress is telling the US military, lead by the Commander in Chief, to go and kill the enemy.
    Which part? The killing the enemy, or the President commanding the government agency that's killing the enemy (the military).
    They are. He is only allowed to kill the enemy if Congress tells him to. Not only that, but Congress must authorize funding for any military effort he might undertake, and they have the power to impeach him at any point.

    Other than banning war and disbanding the US military, I can't imagine anything more limited than that.

    I'm not talking about "terrorists", I'm talking about a specific group of American enemies: Al Qaeda.
    That has nothing to do with this conversation. The President of the United States has been ordering the killing of people in war long before terrorism was a word. That's all Obama has done, by ordering the killing of Al Awlaki. He is not relying on any power given to the President after 1789, to do that. If Congress had passed no laws since then, except the one authorizing military action against Al Qaeda (please don't tell me you disagree with that), he would still have the power to kill any American who associates themselves with Al Qaeda.
     
  24. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    No. If the President attacks someone he wasn't authorized to attack, and lies about it claiming that it was Al Qaeda, then Congress has the power to investigate and impeach him.
    I don't know. Ask your fucking congressman, don't change the subject. We are talking about the decision to kill Anwar Al Awlaki, not Libya.
     
  25. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    I'm pretty confident that the military will not deploy any weapons against Americans protesting the government, under any circumstances.
     

Share This Page