OpieRadio Logo
Compound Media Logo
Jim Norton Logo

NJ Gov. Christie Proposes Tougher Rules for Unemployment

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by tysonpunchinguterus, Mar 14, 2013.

  1. tysonpunchinguterus

    tysonpunchinguterus "Allegedly"

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    5,527
    Likes Received:
    914
    Gov. Christie wants to make it so that anyone collecting unemployment in NJ has to register on a state-run job search website and run a search at least once per week. Of course the usual suspects are crying over this and are claiming that the rule would make it "too hard" and say it's unfair to people without the Internet or who don't understand technology. Ummm, every public library offers free use of its computers and Internet and if someone seraching for a job finds it too ahrd to use the Internet then they probably aren't looking for a job since most places want you to apply online rather than filling out a paper application. If the hardest part of your day is running a search on the Internet then maybe you have it a little too easy. Being forced to use the Internet is a good thing if you dont' know how to use it because you're learning a "skill" that makes you qualified for a slightly better job than you were before. Right now, all it takes is a phone call in which you press 1 button to say that you are actively seeking work. There are no checks in place to see if you're telling the truth. You can also do it online, but somehow requiring the use of a website to actaully look for work is "too hard" and "unfair." 1 fucking phone call every week and there are actually people trying to pass legislation to make it EASIER to keep collecting. How much easier can it get? Keep catering to the lazy and stupid and see where we wind up.

     
  2. ruckstande

    ruckstande Posts mostly from the shitter.

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,655
    Likes Received:
    4,224
    Those same fucks can access the Internet on their gubment phones can't they?
     
  3. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,179
    Likes Received:
    21,788
    Don't have a problem with this, but he should start by making it tougher to collect welfare and food stamps. At least someone on unemployment has worked long enough to become eligible.

    Then again, maybe he doesn't have as much power over federal entitlements as he does unemployment.
     
    Konstantin K, BIV and ruckstande like this.
  4. Begbie

    Begbie Wackbag Generalissimo

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    17,649
    Likes Received:
    4,974
    Good for him...the unemployment system is riddled with fraud.

    He's still an Obamacare/Big Government-lovin, Conservative-In-Name-Only scumbag.
     
    d0uche_n0zzle likes this.
  5. mikeybot

    mikeybot SPANAKOPITA!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,169
    Likes Received:
    3,516
    Unemployment office has computers too.
     
  6. tattered

    tattered Uber-Aryan
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    23,796
    Likes Received:
    8,437
    This will certainly make easier than what were supposed to do to prove were looking. Keep hand written records of where we applied plus all it's info plus who we spoke to if anybody because I'm sure whoever you spoke to will instantly remember your name if they called and asked if you came in looking for work. Many places now won't even let you fill at an application if they are not hiring because they already have a shit ton on file for when they do hire so it's not like they can pull out your application to be able to say yes he did come in
     
  7. Ballbuster1

    Ballbuster1 In The Danger Zone...
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    101,959
    Likes Received:
    16,335
    Too lenient. They need drug testing too.
     
    the Streif and ruckstande like this.
  8. tattered

    tattered Uber-Aryan
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    23,796
    Likes Received:
    8,437
    I wouldn't go that far this isn't a free handout. You actually had to have a job and held it for 4 months to get it and you paid into it. Welfare different story
     
  9. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,179
    Likes Received:
    21,788
    I don't have any problem drug testing people on unemployment... if you can't pass a drug test, your employment options are greatly reduced... but I do agree people on welfare should be drug tested before people on unemployment.
     
  10. tattered

    tattered Uber-Aryan
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    23,796
    Likes Received:
    8,437
    I just disagree because solely because its not a handout
     
  11. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,179
    Likes Received:
    21,788
    To an extent it's not, unless the federal government is subsidizing extensions.
     
  12. Ballbuster1

    Ballbuster1 In The Danger Zone...
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    101,959
    Likes Received:
    16,335
    It is to a point. You pay into it but you can get more out of it
    than you put in. As with any pogram like that, it will be abused
    and the cash being handed out should go to food, housing and
    bills. It shouldn't be used to support drug habits.
     
  13. tattered

    tattered Uber-Aryan
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    23,796
    Likes Received:
    8,437
    well then we will just agree to disagree
     
  14. Ballbuster1

    Ballbuster1 In The Danger Zone...
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    101,959
    Likes Received:
    16,335
    Fair enough sir.
     
  15. Creasy Bear

    Creasy Bear gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    47,647
    Likes Received:
    35,420
    Sounds good on paper... but more oversight always means more bureaucracy and more bureaucrats... more mouthes on the government teat... more government.

    So what you'll end up with is more money spent on "oversight" bureaucracy than the money you'd save by cracking down on fraud. More and bigger government is always a net loser at the end of the day.(copyright- KyleDriven Enterprises LLC)
     
  16. CousinDave

    CousinDave Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    25,297
    Likes Received:
    198


    more bureaucrats means lower unemployment
     
  17. tysonpunchinguterus

    tysonpunchinguterus "Allegedly"

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    5,527
    Likes Received:
    914
    The website already exists and is in use. The only thing they need to do to make this rule work is connect the website to the Unemployment database and set up a rule in that database that requires a search to have been run before a check is generated for that person. It really doesn't require any additional useless government jobs, just one of the existing guys from the IT Department to link the 2 systems. Once that's done then it will all be automated.
     
  18. Creasy Bear

    Creasy Bear gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    47,647
    Likes Received:
    35,420
    And if a givesmedat fraudster files a claim and protests the denial of their claims? Who do you think is going to handle that, a computer? Trust me... the givesedats don't just roll over and take it when they don't get their free shit... they are professional bitchers, moaners, and system cloggers. They've got nothing better to do all day, and they know the bleeding hearts are always sympathetic to their sob stories, and if they can't work the system, they'll throw a wrench in it and laugh while it grinds to a halt.

    You can either cut a "free shit" check in 30 seconds, or you can deal with a givesmedat bitching about not getting "they check" for 30 days straight.
     
  19. JonBenetRamsey

    JonBenetRamsey well shit the bed

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    17,378
    Likes Received:
    8,780
    neither should the tax dollars that pay politicians, maaaaaaaaaaaaaan. but no, if one group of people receiving government money is getting drug tested, ALL people receiving government money should be drug tested.
     
  20. Begbie

    Begbie Wackbag Generalissimo

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    17,649
    Likes Received:
    4,974
    As a former, longtime unemployment teet sucker...I can say with confidence that the unemployment commissions in most states are a colossal mess. My state is a perfect example. The system is automated...you file your weekly claim online or by phone and the automated system pays out. Problem is, this system was about 12 years old and not capable of handling double, triple, or even quadruple the amount of traffic that hit in 2008-2009. In addition, there just isn't enough staff to properly handle and manage claims the way they should. So essentially, you had a great big free for all. There is no need for people to come up with a "Vandelay Industries" and expect that the unemployment office is going to call that company to make sure you've been in contact. There's not enough staff to do that.

    My state's requirement was that you had to be in verbal contact with 3 different companies regarding employment each week and be able to provide the name of the person you contacted, their title, and when you contacted them. And you can't use the same contact over multiple weeks. For those who have been unemployed over the last 5 years, you know that's just not possible. You can't even get these HR reps on the phone to begin with. And when you do, they won't remember who you are or what job you applied for since you're 1 out of sometimes 50+ applicants. I just did the best I could and applied for whatever was out there and kept track of those who I spoke to. When you begin collecting the federal Extended Benefits, you are required, by law, to report to the agency each month and present them with your three HR/job contacts for each previous week. I had 4 such mandatory appointments scheduled over the course of 20 weeks...and the day before each of them, my online account would have a notation saying "Appointment cancelled, Requirement Satisfied". There was just no one there to review my case.

    I'm sure it's still the case today...and those collecting unemployment know damn well they can just fuck around and just collect if they wanted to. That's what has to stop. Unemployment claims are still elevated, but they're not as bad as 2009 when you had 700K+ weekly claims. And those people are no longer active claimants...so there should be significantly less traffic down there. They should be able to start holding these appointments and putting the heat on the applicants to actively seek work.
     
  21. tattered

    tattered Uber-Aryan
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    23,796
    Likes Received:
    8,437
    i guess they no longer require the meetings for federal extensions. i have had zero meetings scheduled and i was told have those notes on record just in case they call you. I cant even get an application to fill out these days so its not like it matters if i write down the persons name they have nothing to back up if showed up there to reference when unemployment calls
     
  22. Begbie

    Begbie Wackbag Generalissimo

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    17,649
    Likes Received:
    4,974
    I'm in the same boat. Nothing has really changed though, mainly because the 8+ million that lost their jobs over the past 5 years haven't actually been able to find full-time "meaningful" employment. They'll (like myself) keep applying to anything and everything...and will likely never be able to reach a live person at this company, or when we do, it's usually, "Sir, I have over 100 applications to look over for this position...I'm sorry I cannot help you." Unemployment agencies know this, but they still want to at least scare you a bit into thinking they're going to check your job search history. But as time goes by...and they never call you in or check your shit...I could definitely see people getting too comfortable collecting. But, eventually it runs out, and that's why you've got all of this opposition to those trying to cut back benefits and hold the claimant's feet to the fire a bit more. I definitely wouldn't be for drug-testing or anything like that (welfare is a different story), but actually being forced to enter the names of positions you've applied for each week and those you've contacted while you're filing your weekly claim online, might motivate these people...albeit slightly. But, the "Keep track of those you talk to each week because ya never know, we may just call you down to present them" isn't really strict enough.
     
  23. tattered

    tattered Uber-Aryan
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    23,796
    Likes Received:
    8,437
    The problem I have is I live in the middle of bumfuck south jersey. So once you can only apply to so many places before it no longer because financially feasible to apply to just any job. The further you get away from home how much the job must pay goes up exponentially to pay for gas and wear and tear on your vehicle.
     
  24. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,179
    Likes Received:
    21,788
    After thinking about this more, I would be fine if drug testing kicked in after six months or whatever. When I worked in logging, those companies had a higher unemployment insurance rate because it was assumed everyone working the seasonal job would collect it during the winter. These companies had no problem with this, and if the state didn't force them to pay unemployment insurance they would fund it privately on their own. If it wasn't for unemployment, logging companies would have a tough time getting experienced workers back the next season. With unemployment, they can usually get by working odd jumps during the winter, but without it they'd be forced into a year-round industry (if they could even find a job).

    So I would put seasonal employees who fully expect on returning to a job in a different class than someone on their 4th federal extension. They already are to the extent that they don't have to record their job search information.
     

Share This Page