That's all well and good but, how do you explain the fact that the Washington Times FUCKING LIED and said no other presidential books were in embassy libraries, when in fact they are?
A review of the expenditures in a federal database did not reveal any examples of State Department purchases of books by former Presidents George W. Bush or Bill Clinton.
They followed up that article by clarifying thusly:
The Times‘ report was based on a review of purchasing records available on a federal spending database. Keyword searches for book titles by former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton did not reveal any records of purchases, while searches for books by Mr. Obama revealed tens of thousands of dollars spent mostly in the year after he was sworn into office.