Oh yeah...The Blaze of course had a field day with this.... Gotta agree with Krauthammer. Not a good move.
Bbbbbuuutttt Obama has a racist pastor!!! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/12/mitt-romney-bain-departure_n_1669006.html
The one thing that Bill Clinton did that made him a more successful POTUS after the 1994 election was to get rid of all the dumb cunts working for him - we all know multiple examples of these type of people in our daily lives. Every politician has them, but few realize or accept it. Had Barry cleaned house 20 months ago the country would likely be in better economic shape, but all these ideological hanger ons will just bring their candidate down that they support as well as the country as a whole. Some people are really good at campaigning but not so good at governing, and some people are good at governing but not so good at campaigning - know when to utilize the skills of each person is crucially important for any POTUS Let's just hop President Romney gets rid of them even earlier than Bill Clinton did.
Let's not act like these people are off the reservation. They're thugs working for a thug. Things are only going to get worse.
The Obama camp needs to watch themselves on this topic. With Democratic cronies like Jon Corzine still walking the streets people are getting fed up with this heads I win tails you lose bullshit. There's some serious thieving going on Wall Street right now and no one is being punished for it.
Even Forbes magazine reports aren't buying Romney's nonsense http://www.forbes.com/sites/tjwalke...-bain-capital-before-the-issue-can-go-away/1/ Sorry for the VMS wall of text, cue the "Haha didn't read" GIF guy.
I hadn't heard that Corzine was involved with Obama's campaign, much less running for President. And remember, when Obama came out in support of the OWS, he was bashed for it by Republicans. Republicans on the other hand have moved the narrative from "Main Street versus Wall Street", to "Rich guys are cool, you can totally trust them to run our country"
I'll just leave this here for Mayr. http://www.mediaite.com/online/game...on-globe-flawed-story-on-romneys-bain-tenure/
1) Now Factcheck is an unbiased and reliable source of info? Seems to me they get attacked by the usual suspects more than DailyKos 2) Factcheck only addresses whether Romney committed a felony. Still doesn't answer the question of "Was he in charge of Bain Capital from 1999-2002". Either way he lied about his involvement at some point. This has already been proven false by his sworn testimony in June 2002 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/12/mitt-romney-bain-departure_n_1669006.html?ir=Politics
Does that mean you'll stop using them? Uh, yeah. No. EDIT: And here is the actual Factcheck article if you care. http://factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/
Again, Factcheck is only disputing whether Romney committed a FELONY on certifying the SEC filing. It doesn't address whether his campaign was lying by saying he had NO INVOLVEMENT with Bain Capital entities. Do you believe that Romney lied in his testimony in 2002 that he really wasn't an active board member of Staples and Lifelike? Do you think being paid $100k a year to do nothing is a smart use of money and Bain Capital was A-OK with getting nothing out of Mitt Romney for it?
The Forbes article came out yesterday. I think I'll wait for the response. Since all the claims about it up until now have turned out to be false, I would be less than surprised if this stuff turns out to be just more hogwash in a day or two.
I still don't see why he listed his "primary occupation" as head of Bain until 2001. Wasn't he getting paid for the Olympics thing?