OpieRadio Logo
Compound Media Logo
Jim Norton Logo

Obama fucked us

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Cunt Smasher, Apr 5, 2012.

  1. Cunt Smasher

    Cunt Smasher Caligula Jr.

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    12,906
    Likes Received:
    3,717
    Won't hear about this on the network news, but it's real.
    http://news.investors.com/Article.aspx?id=606670&ibdbot=1
     
  2. BeerBelly

    BeerBelly Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    27,637
    Likes Received:
    4
    T. Boone Pickens tells Obama what to do
     
  3. Yesterdays Hero

    Yesterdays Hero She's better than you, Smirkalicious.

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    16,246
    Likes Received:
    3,872
    Harper is gigantic douche, but in this case he has a point.
     
  4. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,089
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    Whoever wrote this article doesn't understand the concept of a fungible commodity.
     
  5. Begbie

    Begbie Wackbag Generalissimo

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    17,663
    Likes Received:
    4,991
    Fungus shouldn't have anything to do with this, treehugger. :icon_cool
     
  6. steve500

    steve500 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,520
    Likes Received:
    2,105
    And how the hell is Canada planning on shipping the oil without pipeline?

    The reason we get their shitty heavy sour crude for cheap is because us and China are the only ones who can efficiently refine that crap.

    Without the pipeline, it is better for them to lower the price and have us buy it.

    With the pipeline, the oil has an easy route to the port of Houston = the market rate for Canadian oil goes up.

    Brent crude & similar oil is a commodity, but this isn't the same stuff, or even a viable substitute for the majority of oil consumers.
     
  7. Yesterdays Hero

    Yesterdays Hero She's better than you, Smirkalicious.

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    16,246
    Likes Received:
    3,872
    Let's go down the list.

    1) Canada will ship the oil the same they have since shipping oil was viable, xl pipeline or not (feel free to thank Obama for the veto on said pipeline)

    2) Without the pipeline, better to lower the price and have the US buy it. That's smart. "Hey Canada, we don't want the pipeline that'd give Canada and the US more jobs, and you can't come into the Trans-Pacific Partnership. But you'll lower the price of oil and just let us have it right? We can have the cake and eat it to, ya?" Brilliant!

    Again, wasn't Canada that shot the idea down. Obama said 'No pipeline' and it's been inferred that he doesn't want Canada in the TPP. So Canada figures 'Fuck it then. I'll take my ball and go home. Or better yet, I'll stick to the US and charge them the same price we'd charge the slanteyes.'

    Can't blame Canada when Obama seems to the one that's all too happy to cut off the nose to spite the face.
     
  8. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,654
    Likes Received:
    18,423
    I fail to see the relevance. Oil was equally as fungible when we were getting it from Canada at a reduced price.
     
  9. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    The problem began when we replaced self interested private individuals with politicians in charge of the energy industry. From that point on, expecting anything to go well is retarded.

    It's also retarded to elect a socialist President, and then expect him to facilitate trade by expanding free trade agreements. Sorry, Canada, you're going to have to wait for the next President on that one. Obama is not a fan of free trade.
     
  10. Your_Moms_Box

    Your_Moms_Box Free Shit / Socialism 2016

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    5,755
    Likes Received:
    469
    Am I the only one who read this thread in Cartman's voice?
     
  11. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,089
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    Who is China buying oil from now? And what incentive does China have to buy Canada oil versus the savage oil they are currently getting? What's in it for China?
     
  12. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    Not anymore.
     
  13. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    In the end, fucking with this pipeline (which will be built, once this piece of shit is out of office) doesn't make all that much of a difference, for the price of oil and gas in the US, or for the availability of oil overseas (including China). In the long run, the price is set by global supply and demand, not what some local thug who fancies himself the leader of the free world does to a pipeline project.

    The real difference is in the economic boost another pipeline would've given the US economy. It would've created productive jobs for a change, in several sectors.
     
  14. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,654
    Likes Received:
    18,423
    Well, it could easily fill in the void that is slowly being created by the Iranian sanctions (Chinese imports from Iran are already down 20%). Just look at this story from today ("A major Chinese ship insurer will halt indemnity cover for tankers carrying Iranian oil from July, dealing a blow that narrows the insurance options for Tehran's main export already constricted by payment barriers caused by Western sanctions."). I think the Chinese could easily spare some room for Canadian oil.
     
  15. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,089
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    Saudi Arabia is already gearing up to make up for oil lost to Iranian sanctions
     
  16. lajikal

    lajikal Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    15,491
    Likes Received:
    3,805
    Great, as if the fuckin sauds weren't already deep in america's gapping asshole.
     
  17. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,089
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    Like Neon said, China's looking for oil. We don't buy any Iranian oil so we won't need to buy any of Saudi Arabia's makeup oil.
     
  18. Motor Head

    Motor Head HIGHWAY TRASH REMOVAL

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    10,385
    Likes Received:
    435
    They will build the pipeline. Nebraska has more or less given the go ahead with the new routing of the pipeline. The Chinese will get the oil with or without the pipeline because they are willing to pay more for it. At least that's what I've read on wackbag, so it must be true.
     
  19. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    Are you suggesting there's oil a'plenty in the world, and the last thing we need to worry about is a shortage in supply?
     
  20. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,654
    Likes Received:
    18,423
    The same Saudis who have people clamoring to boycott Russian and Chinese goods because of their support for Assad? This is more complicated than you think. I'm not saying it'll definitely happen, but I'm saying that Canada is a far more stable source than Saudi Arabia, particularly because of their reliance on the Strait of Hormuz.

    PS: I don't know how these things work, but is oil is also not fungible because of the associated costs in shipping, tariffs, trade agreements, etc? I mean, the price of the crude itself is steady, but what about the overhead? Couldn't Canada make them a better deal than the Saudis?
     
  21. lajikal

    lajikal Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    15,491
    Likes Received:
    3,805
    You think the sauds won't raise their prices to make up for associated costs and take advantage of their power and control of a bigger share of the world's oil supply?
     
  22. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,089
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    Considering it costs the Saudi's about five bucks to pump a barrel of oil versus about eighty bucks for Canadians to process a gallon of tar sand, I'd say the Saudi's would have the upper hand in any financial transaction regarding the sale of oil.
     
  23. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,654
    Likes Received:
    18,423
    But who carries the extra overhead? If that extra cost is on the customer (China), doesn't that negate the fungibility of oil? I'm legitimately asking because I know fuck all about international commerce.
     

Share This Page