Saudi Arabia Could Have Prevented 9/11

Kris_LTRMa

LoseTheRadio.net's Ma
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
9,749
Likes
1
Points
333
Location
right where I wanna be
#1
Ex-Saudi ambassador: Kingdom could have helped U.S. prevent 9/11
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/11/01/saudiarabia.terrorism/index.html

(CNN) -- Saudi Arabia could have helped the United States prevent al Qaeda's 2001 attacks on New York and Washington if American officials had consulted Saudi authorities in a "credible" way, the kingdom's former ambassador said in a documentary aired Thursday.

The comments by Prince Bandar bin Sultan are similar to the remarks this week by Saudi King Abdullah that suggested Britain could have prevented the July 2005 train bombings in London if it had heeded warnings from Riyadh.

Speaking to the Arabic satellite network Al-Arabiya on Thursday, Bandar -- now Abdullah's national security adviser -- said Saudi intelligence was "actively following" most of the September 11, 2001, plotters "with precision."

"If U.S. security authorities had engaged their Saudi counterparts in a serious and credible manner, in my opinion, we would have avoided what happened," he said.

Bandar was the Saudi ambassador to Washington for nearly 22 years before he was replaced in 2005. A knowledgeable U.S. official told CNN that Bandar's comments should be taken "with a grain of salt."

On Monday, Abdullah told the BBC that Saudi Arabia had sent warnings to British authorities before the London subway bombings that killed 52 people -- the city's bloodiest day since World War II.

"We have sent information to Great Britain before the terrorist attacks in Britain," Abdullah said. "But unfortunately, no action was taken, and it may have been able to avert the tragedy."

The September 11 attacks killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. All but four of the suicide hijackers who carried out the plot were Saudi nationals, and after the attacks, the kingdom was widely criticized for having tolerated Islamic militancy.

The Saudis have called the criticism unfair, pointing out that al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden's original grievance was against the country's ruling family, which invited U.S. troops into the kingdom after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990.

A string of attacks on Western compounds, oil installations and Saudi institutions between 2003 and 2006 were blamed on al Qaeda's followers.

And Saudi officials say that since 9/11, they have taken steps to ensure charitable donations do not fall into the hands of al Qaeda.

CNN's Pam Benson contributed to this report.
I'm a little confused here ... Prince Bandar is a close personal friend of the Bush family. If he had this information, why didn't he pass it along to them? And what is alleging when he says "If U.S. security authorities had engaged their Saudi counterparts in a serious and credible manner, in my opinion, we would have avoided what happened"?
 

Schmed

I'm a corpse without a soul...
Joined
Nov 4, 2002
Messages
2,356
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Shitsville, NY
#2
I'm a little confused here ... Prince Bandar is a close personal friend of the Bush family. If he had this information, why didn't he pass it along to them? And what is alleging when he says "If U.S. security authorities had engaged their Saudi counterparts in a serious and credible manner, in my opinion, we would have avoided what happened"?
Typical CNN news coverage, almost as if they agree with the Saudi point of view.
 

Treat_Yourself

Registered User
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
548
Likes
0
Points
0
#3
Yeah. They could stop a lot of terrorism by not building and funding radical mosques, cultural centers, and madrassas all over the world that teach Muslims to hate all non Muslims, but they're worthless subhuman filth, so what can we expect from them?
 

TheDrip

I'm bi-winning.
Joined
Jan 9, 2006
Messages
5,051
Likes
3
Points
228
#4
They could also stop it by cracking down on radicals in their own country. There, they can swoop into homes of radicals and terrorist enablers in the middle of the night and make them disappear. Then tell their critics to fuck off.

These are things we could never to here without a public riot, but they're things that have been long accepted as the status quo over there.
 

Kris_LTRMa

LoseTheRadio.net's Ma
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
9,749
Likes
1
Points
333
Location
right where I wanna be
#5
But, maybe I'm missing something....Bandar is a personal friend of Bush's. As a friend, don't you go and say 'listen, I'm hearing reports of some assholes getting ready to fly planes into the Twin Towers, so you might want to inform your intelligence people'?

Or am I naive to think that something like that would actually happen?
 

Treat_Yourself

Registered User
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
548
Likes
0
Points
0
#6
But, maybe I'm missing something....Bandar is a personal friend of Bush's. As a friend, don't you go and say 'listen, I'm hearing reports of some assholes getting ready to fly planes into the Twin Towers, so you might want to inform your intelligence people'?

Or am I naive to think that something like that would actually happen?
Maybe he did call Bush, but only to let him know that he might want to dump his airline stock and roll that money into Halliburton and other oil services companies. Or maybe I'm just being cynical and paranoid.
 
Top Bottom