Stacey Rambold, Former Teacher Who Raped Suicidal Student, Gets 30 Days Jail

BIV

I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.
Apr 22, 2002
77,883
27,155
898
Seattle
#1
Stacey Rambold, Former Teacher Who Raped Suicidal Student, Gets 30 Days Jail
The Huffington Post | By Sebastian Murdock Posted: 08/27/2013 11:48 am EDT | Updated: 08/27/2013 1:33 pm EDT





A former Montana high school teacher convicted of raping a 14-year-old female student who later committed suicide will face only 30 days of jail time.

Stacey Dean Rambold, 54, had at least three sexual encounters with student Cherice Morales in 2008. In 2010, the student committed suicide a few weeks before her 17th birthday, The Billings Gazette reported.

Yellowstone County Judge G. Todd Baugh sentenced Rambold to 15 years prison, with all but only 31 days suspended for sexual intercourse without consent. The judge then gave Rambold credit for one day served, bringing the offender's total jail time to just 30 days.

Auliea Hanlon, mother to the victim, testified that her daughter's relationship with Rambold was a large factor in the teen's suicide. As the sentence was delivered, Hanlon began to scream "You people suck!" before leaving the courtroom.

The judge said victim Morales was "as much in control of the situation" as Rambold, according to Time.com.

Although Rambold was ordered to complete a sex-offender treatment program to have charges dismissed in 2008 after pleading guilty to ****, he was terminated from the program for missing meetings. Judge Baugh said the ex-teacher's termination from the program did not warrant a lengthy imprisonment.

Judge Baugh also said victim Morales was "older than her chronological age."

The same year Rambold was hired as a business teacher for Senior High School in 2004, principal Scott Anderson met with Rambold to discuss allegations that he touched a girl's thigh and waist. A court affidavit said Anderson told Rambold to "keep his hands off all students" and that anything further would result in a formal investigation, KTVQ reported.

Rambold will have to register as a sex offender.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/27/stacy-rambold-raped-suicidal-student_n_3822640.html
 

Norm Stansfield

私は亀が好きだ。
Mar 17, 2009
15,949
4,074
328
#6
The fact that these people, starting from lawmakers all the way to the media, don't see fit to distinguish between rape and statutory rape when talking about these cases, is disturbing.
 

Your_Moms_Box

Free Shit / Socialism 2016
Dec 20, 2004
5,755
468
628
Dover, Delaware
#15
My uneducated guess is that this was the flow if events.

Cute 14 year old girl has crush on her teacher.

Cute 14 year old flirts with teacher.

Teacher's penis takes over and he goes with it.

Sex happens with both parties being all for it.

Somehow girls parents find out.

Parents sue and media finds out.

Teacher is fired.

Girl is exposed as a dirty little whore and all the other students know she is a dirty little whore and she has the reputation for the next 3 years.

Whore girl can't handle it and offs herself.


so, my guess is that the lawsuit and publicity are why she offs herself and not the mediocre 3-pump sex.

Sent from a phone using an app.
 

fletcher

Darkness always says hello.
Donator
Feb 20, 2006
59,552
19,736
513
jersey
#16
My uneducated guess is that this was the flow if events.

Cute 14 year old girl has crush on her teacher.

Cute 14 year old flirts with teacher.

Teacher's penis takes over and he goes with it.

Sex happens with both parties being all for it.

Somehow girls parents find out.

Parents sue and media finds out.

Teacher is fired.

Girl is exposed as a dirty little whore and all the other students know she is a dirty little whore and she has the reputation for the next 3 years.

Whore girl can't handle it and offs herself.


so, my guess is that the lawsuit and publicity are why she offs herself and not the mediocre 3-pump sex.

Sent from a phone using an app.
Sounds like something written by Nabakov.
 
Nov 29, 2006
3,452
374
523
FL
#19
The fact that these people, starting from lawmakers all the way to the media, don't see fit to distinguish between rape and statutory rape when talking about these cases, is disturbing.
Yellowstone County Judge G. Todd Baugh sentenced Rambold to 15 years prison, with all but only 31 days suspended for sexual intercourse without consent. The judge then gave Rambold credit for one day served, bringing the offender's total jail time to just 30 days.
So how do you distinguish **** from statutory **** when it's sex without consent with a 14 year old? And who gives a fuck? If you fuck a child, it's ****.
 

Norm Stansfield

私は亀が好きだ。
Mar 17, 2009
15,949
4,074
328
#20
So how do you distinguish **** from statutory **** when it's sex without consent with a 14 year old?
Are you really incapable of acknowledging the difference between sex against someone's will and willing sex with someone below the age of consent?
And who gives a fuck?
Anyone who wishes to use language as an accurate, clear representation of reality, and as a tool for applying logic to reality.

The people who wish to use language to create a false or blurred representation of reality are the ones who don't give a fuck.
If you fuck a child, it's ****.
Again, you're using language aimed at blurring reality, not at representing facts clearly.

The legal definition of statutory **** is an adult having sex with a minor under the legal age of consent and above the age of a child, or with a mentally disabled person.

Sex with a child is not statutory ****, it's sexual child abuse, and is punished under different statutes. This wasn't sex with a child. A 14 yo. is not a child.
 
Last edited:

tattered

Uber-Aryan
Wackbag Staff
Aug 22, 2002
23,801
8,426
838
JERZ
#22
Sex against someone's will is different from sex without consent because a 14 year old isn't fully qualified to legally consent.

Refusing to differentiate between the two is deeply irrational.
*im gonna go rouge here and make a slightly off topic diatribe*
Yeah which when you read that it makes your head hurt because they both technically mean the same thing but yet they dont. Same goes for the fact the with 14yr old example. She consented but according to the law she didnt even though she did. Then what if in this example age of consent is 16 and the guy is 15. Do both parties get charged with statutory rape or just the guy because he is the older of the 2 (or lets face it if its just the guy getting charged its purely because hes a guy and we all know only males rape. Never woman). The Statutory Rape laws are to vague and confusing and can absolutely the lives of 18-20yr olds even though both guy and girl attended high school together. They really should exempt both guys and girls from being charged with with statutory rape if they did, could have due to ages, or are currently attending high school together. This should especially go for seniors because most of them turn 18 during that time
 

Norm Stansfield

私は亀が好きだ。
Mar 17, 2009
15,949
4,074
328
#23
This is what angers you about this story?
Nothing angers me about this story.

But people's tendency to be more concerned with their emotions than with rationally evaluating facts, and their willingness to be irrational just to get a cheap emotional release, is the only part I find interesting enough to talk about, yes.

The reason for that is because it's the only part that can affect me. I have no intention of getting sexually involved with any dysfunctional teens with daddy issues, or with neglecting my future children to the point that they become dysfunctional teens with daddy issues. So that part is irrelevant to me.

But the majority of the adult population of the US acting like they've just been shut up with 100 mgs of estrogen whenever they read the news, is a concern. It doesn't bode well for the future of the place, now does it?
 

Your_Moms_Box

Free Shit / Socialism 2016
Dec 20, 2004
5,755
468
628
Dover, Delaware
#25
So how do you distinguish **** from statutory **** when it's sex without consent with a 14 year old? And who gives a fuck? If you fuck a child, it's ****.

Are you misunderstanding consent?

She physically, verbally, and emotionally consented to having sex with him.

However, LEGALLY, she is not allowed to give that consent because of her age.

He didn't force his dick into her while she screamed no. She was a willing participant whose parents found out.

Is the guy stupid? Yeah, he is a fucking moron, but I don't think that this is a case where he pursued her and she was young and stupid. She had a crush on her teacher and made moves on him and he was too fucking stupid to say no and jack to the thought of fucking her instead.

I remember being in high school and girls her age flirting with the male teachers.
 
Top Bottom