Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Falldog, Jun 3, 2013.
That's an odd spilt. Good for Scalia.
They are blueprinting your DNA from a swab just like they have a blueprint of your finger print. They can't plant your DNA somewhere like they can't plant your fingerprint.. Or can they?
A fingerprint is done for, mostly, every crime where as DNA only for serious crimes. I would guess **** and violent assaults.
I kind of don't see the difference.
Explain what I am missing.
The fact that they would keep your DNA sample in national database even if you were to be found not guilty in court. Also, its now only a matter of time (maybe 10-15 years) before they start collecting DNA samples for minor crimes too. That would also be permanent additions to the national database regards of trial outcome. From there (maybe 10-20 later), they'll start requesting and collecting DNA samples during routine traffic stops as well.
Like a fingerprint, minus the traffic stop part, all those steps are already in place regardless of trial outcomes. And its not exactly they sample they keep stored but a blueprint of that sample.
EDIT :Just to be clear I'm not saying everyone line up to give DNA samples and the gubmint rules. I'm just trying to figure out the difference between a fingerprint and a DNA blueprint. How, once your arrested and before trial, that DNA blueprint is more intrusive than a fingerprint.
Fore example Every prisoner going through central booking down here takes an iris picture. Its something that cant be left at a scene but thats in a database too.
You answered your own question. It's too easy to plant DNA evidence, even if they only have the "blueprint."
How do you drop a dna blueprint without a sample? A sample being saliva, skin, blood, semen and stuff. I figure it would be just as easy, if not easier, to plant a fingerprint with a "blueprint".
Discarding the sample and keeping the blueprint seems no different than a fingerprint.
You've got a guy in jail serving time and you don't think it would be possible to get some hair from his pillow to plant at some unsolved crime?
Iris scans are a biometric ID. Guess they figure its 'hack' proof at this point in time. That is until someone builds a 3D cloning machine.
Sure. But that has nothing to do with the sample they collected from the arrest. Which they then blueprinted and threw away.
Which is what I am getting at. They don't have a sample anymore just the blueprint. Similar to the fingerprint blueprint. And if thats ok, why not DNA.
If you're booked and fingerprinted are your prints retained regardless of the outcome?
If I were a bad guy I'd take DNA from a previously sampled convict/person I don't like and leave that DNA behind at the scene of a crime.
it's a trick to get DNA for clones.
Because it's a lot harder to plant fingerprint evidence.
Luckily, most criminals are stupid.
I would disagree. It's a lot harder to plant DNA without a sample like hair or blood. All they have is a blueprint of it to compare to actual samples collected from crime scenes.
But the conspiracy planted evidence reason is not really a valid argument. An it doesn't explain the difference between fingerprint and DNA blueprints if both can be planted anyway.
Besides. DNA at a crime scene or lack of DNA isn't enough by itself to prove guilt or innocence.
For a lot of juries it is.
I'd tell the fuckers that you'll be getting my sample off the floor after you beat it out of me. You won't get it any other way.
Yep. Cuz TV
If the guy's in prison, how can they frame him for a new crime? They'd have to explain how he got out of prison, committed the crime, and decided for some reason to return to prison without anyone noticing. Or do you mean that they'd pin an old, unsolved crime from before his prison time? Even in that case, they'd only need the hair and that would still require at least 1 detective to get at least 1 prison guard to agree to go along with his plan, be able to plant the evidence in the file, and explain how a hair went unnoticed all that time and was suddenly discovered while that guy was in prison. The odds of someone going to those lengths to frame an inmate are pretty slim and the odds of it being successful are even slimmer.
I'm not talking about some guy institutionalized in a big prison. More like some Mayberry local jail where the "guard" is one of the sheriff's deputies. And even in bigger cities you don't think cops still plant evidence? Nigga please...
I'm not saying cops never plant evidence. What I'm saying is that planting DNA evidence is harder to do than planting drugs at the crime scene before anyone else arrives or while nobody else is looking or to say you found drugs on a person during a pat-down. For an unsolved crime, the crime scene no longer exists so going back after the fact to plant evidence is useless. Going into the file to plant evidence that wasn't accounted for from the beginning creates an obvious opportunity for any defense lawyer with a functioning brain to plant reasonable doubt in the jurors' minds simply by asking why that DNA wasn't discovered until after his client was arrested on another charge.
A bunch of panicky petes in this thread.
Yes, if you are ever fingerprinted it's in the database for good.
No, it is not easier to plant DNA from the blueprint than it is a fingerprint.
Mandatory DNA will exonerate more innocent people than it will convict.
I'm torn... part of me thinks taking DNA from a person who hasn't been convicted is too intrusive. Yes, I know they already take your fingerprints/mugshot... but it's just one more thing... a further eroding of our privacy.
On the other hand... I do fucking love it when the cops nab scumbag rapists with the "cold hits" they get when they enter more and more people into CODIS. And that is how they catch a LOT of those sick fucks.
The CODIS is a fantastic tool for law enforcement, and I'm really not too paranoid about cops planting DNA or the BillBurr Group using my DNA to make a clone army that will lock me up in a FEMA death camp.
Meh... you can have my DNA, just don't take my container of coffee.
I don't see this as a big problem.
So it's easy to plant a fingerprint. Noted.