Discussion in 'Current Events' started by BIV, Dec 5, 2012.
Really Wackbag? You've got nothing on this?
You do realize we go to war if even one of these are used, right?
Mods, dump this shit in my Syria Thread for archiving.
Nope not happening
No matter what the Syrians do nothing will be done about it, because they are to tight with the Russians, the largest Russian base outside of Russia is in Syria
If they started lobbing nerve gas at civilians, even Russia would have to back us.
Considering the amount of "friendly fire" that has killed US troops, could you imagine if the US accidentally killed some Russian troops
The comments on the article I read are fucking hilarious. The libtards think it's a replay of Iraq, and claim the chemical weapons don't exist, while the conservatards are claiming these are the WMDs that Saddam smuggled out of the country before the war.
Meanwhile, even Iran is freaking out over this. If those loonies think you're going too far, perhaps it's time to reconsider your position.
News flash, asshat - Iraq had chemical weapons, and much of their stockpile was taken across the northern border to Syria while we fucked around in Kuwait preparing to invade. There were several Green Beret teams in the northern border watching the trucks leave. Hell, there were even chemical weapons found in Iraq during the war. If you actually do something as simple as a google search, you'd know this.
But Israel killed some terrorists and is building some houses!!!
Hooray for the Arab spring! Democracy and peace comes to the Middle East!
Remember those dipshits?
Like I always say- "The only good Mohammedan is a dead one." So let's go, Assad. Get those bombs in the air.
The largest Russian base outside Russia is in Sevastopol, The Ukraine.
Russia doesn't have military bases in Syria. It has an old supply and maintenance facility, on a Syrian Naval Base in Tartus, with about 10 Russian soldiers on it. I'm pretty sure we'd be able to miss them just fine.
And here's what one of those dipshits is saying now. Check out this frightening glimpse into the delusional mind of a liberal dem...
Can't do it... his twisted liberal mind just won't allow him to grasp the concept that the only kind of freedom those savages want is the freedom to be savages. He gets close... but he just can't allow himself to accept the ugly truth.
He goes on to blame the failure of democracy, peace, and liberal ideology to take hold after the Arab spring on "Saudi petrodollars".... maaaaaaaaan! And at the end there he tries to hold on to the sliver of hope that what he's seeing is just the teething pains of a newborn democracy that will soon blossom in the Middle East.
Liberal Dems... such silly, deluded little creatures.
Hooray for the Bush Doctrine! Democracy and peace comes to the Middle East!
Remember those dipshits?
Yep... the Bush years proved that you can't shove democracy and peace down the savage's throats, and the Arab spring proved that the savages can't shove democracy and peace down their own throats.
Even Bush's military leaders and foreign policy gurus realized it was impossible to civilize savages.
And an ambassador and 3 of his buddies died for the cause.
A realization the liberal dems will never allow themselves to make.
Nah, they just inherit it from the previous administration.
Petraeus's and Mullen/McCrystal's COIN and AfPakHands programs have tried to "engage" the savages in a 'kindler, gentler" way. How many of our guys have been taken out by Afghanis in military uniforms the last couple of years?
Just to be clear, Partycock: You're blaming Bush, right?
Both. Just pointing out that it's not only liberals that think savages won't be savages.
We lost 7 in one attack a couple years ago.
He was an Afghan?