Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MagicBob, Sep 13, 2011.
Ron Paul nuts. Sky Blue. Pope Hat. Bear Shit Woods.
So whats your point? I already know that liberals think that no one should have to pay for there irresponsibility and there should be no consequences. So what if I choose to not have insurance, I can just use the money of other hard working Americans and if you have a problem with that then YOU are the problem.
You are doing a terrible job of proving you don't have an agenda.
Bbbbbbbut DEATH PANELS!!!!!
Sometimes our decisions kill us. I work hard, pay for insurance, etc etc but if I walk against the "Don't Walk" signal and get ran over by a bus full of people being shipped in to vote for Obamaaction-sm), that is the consequence of my decision.
Dude should have paid for insurance. He was an adult, made an adult decision, paid an adult price. It's called personal responsibility.
Can someone change the title of this thread to something more fucking honest like "Debate audience is sick of people like MagicBob trying to take their money"? Fucking leaches, the lot of you.
so should ambulance crews do credit checks before transporting? No money to pay? screw you, you bleed out in the street at the scene of the accident. Is that how it should be?
stop with the "people like you" crap. Drop the personal attacks Either speak to the subject at hand, or dont speak at all troll.
The subject is your thread is based on a false premise. The audience wants people like you to stop stealing their money because you need gubmint funded Viagra to plug your mother's stink hole.
nicely done, nothing but a personal attack. Perhaps worthy of a ban. We'll see.
So should ambulances do credit checks before treating?
See this is just evil. Personal responsibility... that's some dangerous talk there buddy.
The problem is you have Liberals who feel that it is there responsibility to save everyone from themselves. All that does of course is create a society that can't handle consequences and becomes depended on govt support all at the cost of those who do work and live responsibly.
The fact that the problem in this story is not that the guy was irresponsible and stupid it's about being outraged that anyone could have the audacity to expect him to deal with the consequences of his actions just shows how fucking screwed we are as a nation.
This story is a perfect example.
shhhhhhh, yer gunna rune it!!!
actually, they wont notice anyway.
its a simple question.
Wow you really are a complete faggot.
Hopefully they check yours when you OD on amyl nitrate poppers before a big night on the town.
If you don't understand what the audience was advocating, you miss the entire point. Which I'm quite sure you do, anyway. You expect everything to be given to you.
Here's a fucking protip, junior: Anything that is given to you was taken (by force or coercion) from someone who actually fucking earned it. Grow the fuck up.
So what your saying is a government requirement that hospitals treat someone that has no ability to pay is a socialist idea and greatly oversteps the roll of government?
is that the gist of your argument (minus the random personal bullshit attacks)?
No, but further assistance is a separate issue. People use to buy insurance because they were scared of getting hurt or killed, now they spend that money on HDTVs and video game systems because someone else will always pay. The consequences must be there for the system to work.
Is it fair that I spend $100/month on insurance and have a $3,000 health savings account, yet someone in the exact financial position as me ignores their responsibilities yet expects the same level of medical care?
ooooohhh boy!!!! a PROtip. Wow... you've latched on the new overused phrase. Congrats.
So the ambulance should scoop them up... and then what? at what point do you cut off medical care if there is no ability to pay? Do you let someone die because the cant pay? Do you save their life, but say...not set a broken bone? Where is the line?
No, I'm saying that government requirement that hospitals treat someone that has no ability to pay is a socialist idea and greatly oversteps the role of government.
I'm sure no one ever told you this, but there were charity hospitals treating people before the government started forcing them to do so. Ever wonder why so many hospitals are named after saints? It wasn't because the founders liked football.
Can you imagine if we always were like this. We would all be British right now.
huh, I wonder what socialist fuck that was trying to bring about the destruction of America through the unconstitutional expansion of the powers of the Federal Government singed that piece of shit law into the books?
.......waaaaaaiiiiiiiiit for it...........