The Woke Narrative: Victimhood Culture, Intersectionality, Social Justice Warriors (SJW)

THE FEZ MAN

as a matter of fact i dont have 5$
#51
Let’s just skip ahead here. How long before their final solution is implemented and they start coming for white males for purging or holocausting, because it sure seems like that dream of a world like that.
If the trend keeps up, I will say within a generation or two, they have to figure out how to disarm us first
 

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#52
The only connection 'intersectional' activists have is in their common enemy, the straight white male.

No matter what their oppression is it can all be blamed on the same source.
And it doesn't matter if you're a liberal. Many of the examples I posted were from liberals shocked at the intersectionalists.

What kind of Democrat party do they want? What kind of country do they want?

One based on compassion and bringing people together:

MLK:
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.
or intersectionality, a quasi-religious dogma based on hate, victimhood, and tribalistic divisions.
 

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#54
And it doesn't matter if you're a liberal. Many of the examples I posted were from liberals shocked at the intersectionalists.

What kind of Democrat party do they want? What kind of country do they want?

One based on compassion and bringing people together:

MLK:
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.
or intersectionality, a quasi-religious dogma based on hate, victimhood, and tribalistic divisions.
In the UK, woke Owen Jones interviews liberal Tom Walker.

Which kind of progressivism do you want?

Jonathan Pie has become an online cult phenomenon with his political rants. Despite being a Jeremy Corbyn supporting lefty, Tom Walker, the man behind Pie, has made many on the left uncomfortable by offering up some challenging perspectives, particularly on freedom of speech and identity politics. I went to meet the man behind the fictional news presenter to discuss his own political views.
 
Last edited:

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#59
Bravo.

Interesting ideas here: victimhood culture and identity politics as mass hysteria and delusion which is fueled by the narcissism epidemic.

 

DiggerNick

Well-Known Member
Donator
#60
I've never heard of this asshole. He may be the worst human being on earth.


Brittany Venti's videos are a good watch, Especially when she shows some cleave from her ffffffat ffffffuckin' tiiiits!!!
 

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#61
Brill. And look at that bloke sitting beside her to the left. Why it's none other than Andrew Doyle (Titania McGrath).


Full debate link here.
 
Last edited:
#62
Antifa has plenty of straps and theyre willing to use them on unarmed crowds
Agreed, Antifa's willingness to use violence to shutdown their opponents unfortunately shows that they are currently winning. Antifa's opponents so far have refused to fight back and defend the enlightenment. At best all they do is go home and whine on social media about the speeches being interrupted and cancelled.
 

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#65
Great discussion between Rogan and Jonathan Haidt.

"call out culture"
prestige and status in calling someone out
"reputation mangagement"

 

click

Registered User
#66
This shit is almost as bad as the Q thread. Stop already for fucks sake
No really just fucking stop
 

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#67
This shit is almost as bad as the Q thread. Stop already for fucks sake
No really just fucking stop
No.

If you don't like it, don't read it.

Why should I stop? Is it because you're offended? You're triggered?

You do realize you're trying to shut down speech in a thread about people who, as their primary tactic, employ bullying and shaming language to shut down speech. :haha7:

This thread employs evidence, logic, and rational argument, discussion, and debate, while the Q thread does not.
 
#71
No.

If you don't like it, don't read it.

Why should I stop? Is it because you're offended? You're triggered?

You do realize you're trying to shut down speech in a thread about people who, as their primary tactic, employ bullying and shaming language to shut down speech. :haha7:

This thread employs evidence, logic, and rational argument, discussion, and debate, while the Q thread does not.
I'm with Big Dick @click on this one. All threads should be about counting your drinks, listening to the Allman Brothers and kissing each other goodnight.
 

Floyd1977

Registered User
#72
Agreed, Antifa's willingness to use violence to shutdown their opponents unfortunately shows that they are currently winning. Antifa's opponents so far have refused to fight back and defend the enlightenment. At best all they do is go home and whine on social media about the speeches being interrupted and cancelled.
Yeah, the "we have the guns" concept is no guarantee of victory against a determined foe. Antifa also has very powerful tools such as the media and local government that instructs law enforcement to stand down and allow them to engage in their vandalism, destruction and violence.
 

Jacuzzi Billy

Watching PTI
Donator
#73
I think it's obvious SJW culture is almost purely narcissism. It fucking sucks but part of me doesnt hate these people. We are all innate attention whores. They just take it to another level. The other part of me completely hates them.
 

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#74
Not only is Dem darling AO-C an intersectionalist, but it's interesting . . .
How does one bring socialism to the U.S.? Why, you simply add "economic oppression" to the interlocking matrix of oppression, thus fusing identity politics and class politics together.

Her life story and political actions have a flexible, intersectional quality that is taking shape before our eyes, helping to create a new force in American politics.
With her own hybrid of intense neighborhood canvassing and digital engagement — on social media and in several millennial-focused online publications — Ocasio-Cortez is fusing identity politics with class politics. “I can’t name a single issue with roots in race that doesn’t have economic implications, and I cannot think of a single economic issue that doesn’t have racial implications,” she told the magazine the Nation last week. “The idea that we have to separate them out and choose one is a con.”
https://www.thelily.com/alexandria-...remix-of-latino-roots-and-socialist-politics/

She also called upon the party to develop “a more comprehensive and intersectional argument for working people.”
Both Stiglitz and Ocasio-Cortez emphasized that issues of race, the economy, and the environment were intertwined.
https://www.ineteconomics.org/persp...casio-cortez-talk-social-and-economic-justice

And here we see the hijacking of the goodwill towards MLK and his vision, and twisting it and distorting it into the intersectional narrative.

Ocasio-Cortez’s compelling speech began by noting that the third annual Women’s March was taking place just before Martin Luther King Jr. Day, something that she doesn’t think is a coincidence. “I believe this moment and where we are right now is a resurgence from where the Civil Rights Movement left off,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “We are here to carry the torch forward, because when we talked about racial and economic justice, racial and social justice, we started to really extend those issues to the issues of economic justice, environmental justice, and the intersectionality and interconnectedness of all of our fights.”
 
Last edited:

SKEPTIC

Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand.
#75
TUCKER CARLSON: As anyone who’s ever been caught in its gears can tell you, the great American outrage machine is a remarkable thing. One minute you’re having dinner with your family, imagining that everything is fine. The next, your phone is exploding with calls from reporters. They read you snippets from a press release written by Democratic Party operatives. They demand to know how you could possibly have said something so awful and offensive. “Do you have a statement on how immoral you are?” It’s a bewildering moment, especially when the quotes in question are more than a decade old.
There’s really not much you can do to respond. It’s pointless to explain how the words were spoken in jest, or taken out of context, or in any case bear no resemblance to what you actually think, or would want for the country. None of that matters. Nobody cares. You know the role you’re required to play: You’re a sinner, begging the forgiveness of Twitter. So you issue a statement of deep contrition. You apologize profusely for your transgressions. You promise to be a better person going forward. With the guidance of your contrition consultants, you send money to whatever organization claims to represent the people you supposedly offended. Then you sit back and brace for a wave of stories about your apology, all of which are simply pretexts for attacking you again. In the end, you lose your job. Nobody defends you. Your neighbors avert their gaze as you pull into the driveway. You’re ruined.​
Yet, no matter how bad it gets, no matter how despised and humiliated you may be, there’s one thing you can never do, one thing that’s absolutely not allowed: You can never acknowledge the comic absurdity of the whole thing. You can never laugh in the face of the mob. You must always pretend that the people yelling at you are somehow your moral superiors. You must assume that what they say they’re mad about is what they’re actually mad about. You must pretend that this is a debate about virtue, and not power; that your critics are arguing from principle and not partisanship. No matter what they take from you, you must continue to pretend that these things are true: You are bad. They are good. The system is on the level.​
But what if we stopped pretending? What if we acknowledged what’s actually going on: one side is deadly serious. They believe that politics is war. They’re not interested in abstractions or principles, rules or traditions. They seek power. They plan to win it, whatever it takes. If that includes getting you fired, or silencing you, or threatening your family at home, or throwing you in prison, so be it. Their goal is power. If you’re in the way, they’ll crush you.​
What’s interesting is how reliably the other side pretends that none of this is happening. Republicans in Washington do a fairly credible imitation of an opposition party. The still give speeches. They tweet quite a bit. They make concerned noises about how bad liberals are. But on the deepest level, it’s all a pose. In their minds, where it matters, Republican leaders are controlled by the left. They know exactly what they’re allowed to say and believe. They know that the rules are. They may understand that those rules were written by the very people who seek their destruction. They ruthlessly enforce them anyway. Republicans in Washington police their own with never-ending enthusiasm. Like trustees in a prison, they dutifully report back to the warden, hoping for perks. Nobody wants to be called names. Nobody wants to be Trump.​
How many times have you seen it happen? Some conservative figure will say something stupid, or incomplete, or too far outside the bounds of received wisdom for the moral guardians of cable news. Twitter goes crazy. The mob demands a response. Very often, the first people calling for the destruction of that person are Republican leaders. You saw it with the Covington Catholic high school kids. You see it all the time. Kevin McCarthy spends half his life telling his Republican members not to criticize progressive orthodoxy. Paul Ryan did the same before him. A couple of years ago, the entire Democratic Party decided to deny the biological reality of sex differences, an idea that’s as insane as it is dangerous. Republican leaders decided not to criticize them for it. They might get upset.​
This is a system built on deceit and enforced silence. Hypocrisy is its hallmark. Yet in Washington, it’s considered rude to ask questions about how it works. Why are the people who considered Bill Clinton a hero lecturing me about sexism? How can the party that demands racial quotas denounce other people as racist? After a while you begin to think that maybe their criticisms aren’t that sincere. Maybe their moral puffery is a costume. Maybe the whole conversation is an absurd joke. Maybe we’re falling for it.​
You sometimes hear modern progressives described as the new puritans. That’s a slur on colonial Americans. Whatever their flaws, the puritans cared about the fate of the human soul and the moral regeneration of their society. Those aren’t topics that interest progressives. They’re too busy pushing late term abortion and cross dressing on fifth graders. These are the people who write our movies and sitcoms. They’re not shocked by naughty words. They just pretend to be when it’s useful.​
It’s been very useful lately. The left’s main goal, in case you haven’t noticed, is controlling what you think. In order to do that, they have to control the information you receive. Google and Facebook and Twitter are on board. They’re happy to ban unapproved thoughts without apology. They often do. So do the other cable channels, and virtually every major news outlet in this country. On of the only places left in America where an independent view is allowed is right here, the primetime shows on this network. A total of three hours, in a sea of television programming. It’s not much, relatively speaking. For the left, it’s unacceptable. They demand total conformity. Since the day we went on the air, they’ve been working hard to kill this show. We haven’t said much about it in public. It seemed too self-referential. The point of this show has never been us. But now it’s obvious to everyone. There’s no pretending it’s not happening. Going forward we’ll be covering their efforts to make us be quiet. For now, just two points. First, Fox is behind us, as they have been since the first day. Toughness is a rare quality in a TV network, and we’re grateful for that. Second, we’ve always apologized when we’re wrong, and we will continue to. That’s what decent people do. But we will never bow to the mob. Ever. No matter what.​
video at link:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...s_controlling_what_you_think.html?jwsource=cl
 
Top