Treasongate

ruckstande

Posts mostly from the shitter.
Donator
Well this was all fun guys. I guess Trump is going to face tastes of more bullshit and the real criminals get to go home. See y'all later.
 

TravisRB69

Registered User
Jesus Christ how did that smug know-it-all shitsack Comey ever make it to adulthood without getting beaten to the point of permanent hospitalization because he pissed off the wrong guy?
 

MurphCO

Enough of this palaver
Donator
We lovingly refer to these people as "Lunch Money"

there are a lot of people that had their lunch money stolen as a kid that used that hate to drive themselves to positions of power where they can "get revenge" on big bad bullies....and be bullies themselves as a result.
 

Hog's Big Ben

Getting ass-***** in The Octagon, brother.
Donator
The DOJ said a month ago they weren't going to prosecute Comey over the leaks. So what was the point of this separate report?
 

d0uche_n0zzle

**Negative_Creep**
Jesus Christ how did that smug know-it-all shitsack Comey ever make it to adulthood without getting beaten to the point of permanent hospitalization because he pissed off the wrong guy?
Commie Comey is very tall, like 6' 7" ish. That probably kept him from the ass-kicking he surely needs.
 

Opie&JimmyShow

Well-Known Member
Donator
I am not surprised. It is still disappointing.

Sent from your Mom's box.
 

Begbie

Wackbag Generalissimo
August is not looking so "hot" as we were led to believe...kinda lukewarm-ish. Tepid.

But maybe we'll be told it's going to be a sweltering September next.
 

domelogic

Registered User
Wait what? I have never read that someone reported hrc server was hacked. It was reported to the fbi when she was sos. Now guess who it was reported to? None other than Strzok(sp?). Imagine that

 

domelogic

Registered User
https://m.theepochtimes.com/flynn-a...ed_3064423.html/amp?__twitter_impression=true

Flynn Accuses Prosecutors of Hiding Exculpatory Evidence, Demands They Be Removed

Attorneys for former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn on Aug. 30 accused prosecutors in a lawsuit against Flynn of hiding exculpatory evidence. Flynn’s team asked the judge to find the prosecutors in contempt of a standing court order, which would lead to the prosecutors’ dismissal from the case.
“They continued to hide that exculpatory information for months—in direct contravention of this Court’s Order—and they continue to suppress exculpatory information to this day,” Attorney Sidney Powell wrote in a motion to compel the production of the exculpatory evidence.
The attorneys accuse the government of singling out Flynn for prosecution “motivated by a discriminatory purpose” and suggest that the evidence used against the former national security adviser may have been illegally obtained.
Protect yourself against fake news. Get real news directly to your phone. Download The Epoch Times app here.
The defense attorney further asked the court to order that the prosecutors preserve all evidence, including the communications of the staff at the now-closed office of special counsel Robert Mueller.
The filing is the first major legal volley by the defense team led by Powell, a vocal critic of prosecutorial misconduct within the Justice Department (DOJ). Flynn fired his former legal team in June.
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator
https://m.theepochtimes.com/flynn-a...ed_3064423.html/amp?__twitter_impression=true

Flynn Accuses Prosecutors of Hiding Exculpatory Evidence, Demands They Be Removed

Attorneys for former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn on Aug. 30 accused prosecutors in a lawsuit against Flynn of hiding exculpatory evidence. Flynn’s team asked the judge to find the prosecutors in contempt of a standing court order, which would lead to the prosecutors’ dismissal from the case.
“They continued to hide that exculpatory information for months—in direct contravention of this Court’s Order—and they continue to suppress exculpatory information to this day,” Attorney Sidney Powell wrote in a motion to compel the production of the exculpatory evidence.
The attorneys accuse the government of singling out Flynn for prosecution “motivated by a discriminatory purpose” and suggest that the evidence used against the former national security adviser may have been illegally obtained.
Protect yourself against fake news. Get real news directly to your phone. Download The Epoch Times app here.

The defense attorney further asked the court to order that the prosecutors preserve all evidence, including the communications of the staff at the now-closed office of special counsel Robert Mueller.
The filing is the first major legal volley by the defense team led by Powell, a vocal critic of prosecutorial misconduct within the Justice Department (DOJ). Flynn fired his former legal team in June.
Flynn fucked them HARD.

They thought they could scare him into pleading guilty and taking a plea deal, but he pled guilty, and then refused a deal. He's forcing them to prosecute him, and, in doing so, the have to show their cards, but they REALLY don't want to show their cards, because their cards are covered in their own scummy bullshit.

Right now, the DOJ is stonewalling, and basically just praying that the Sun explodes.
 

domelogic

Registered User
Flynn fucked them HARD.

They thought they could scare him into pleading guilty and taking a plea deal, but he pled guilty, and then refused a deal. He's forcing them to prosecute him, and, in doing so, the have to show their cards, but they REALLY don't want to show their cards, because their cards are covered in their own scummy bullshit.

Right now, the DOJ is stonewalling, and basically just praying that the Sun explodes.

Yup and that may just have been the plan from the beginning. If you want to go “conspiracy” theory.
 

ruckstande

Posts mostly from the shitter.
Donator
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cies-in-underlying-notes-taken-by-fbi-agents/

DOJ Claims “They Don’t Have” Original Flynn 302 After Attorney Sidney Powell Points Out Discrepancies in Underlying Notes Taken by FBI Agents
by Cristina Laila September 10, 2019 243 Comments
On Tuesday General Flynn and his attorney Sidney Powell attended a scheduled conference with US District Judge Emmet Sullivan to discuss Flynn’s cooperation with prosecutors and whether the two sides are ready to set a sentencing date.

During the hearing on Tuesday, Sidney Powell told the Court that she identified differences in the 302s and the notes and materials underlying the 302s taken by FBI agents during their January 24th ambush interview with Flynn.
A 302 report is used by the FBI to summarize notes taken while interviewing a subject and must be submitted within 5 days of the interview, according to FBI rules.

“[We’ve] identified material differences between the agents’ notes from their interviews of Mr. Flynn on the 24th and the 302 they produced.”
The DOJ claimed they don’t have the original Flynn 302.
“They say they don’t have it, but it would certainly be in the FBI’s computer system. Things don’t disappear like that. So that still needs to be produced,” Sidney Powell argued to the Court.

Sidney Powell also said Tuesday that “There have been stunning failures to produce Brady [material] in this case going back as far as July 2017…”


Also revealed Tuesday was evidence of a bombshell DOJ memo that exonerates General Flynn.
A bombshell revelation was barely noticed at National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s hearing Tuesday, when his counsel revealed in court the existence of a Justice Department memo from Jan. 30, 2017 exonerating Flynn of any collusion with Russia.
The memo, which has still not been made available to Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell, is part of a litany of Brady material she is demanding from prosecutors.
The memo is currently under protective order and Powell is working with prosecutors to get it disclosed, SaraACarter.com has learned.


Why won’t the FBI/DOJ hand over the original Flynn 302?
One reason is because it has been reported that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe altered the 302 notes taken by FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka — then McCabe destroyed the evidence.
According to reporters and lawyers who attended Tuesday’s hearing, Judge Emmet Sullivan took notice and agreed with Sidney Powell when she argued that there was no factual predicate for the FARA violation.
If “there was no factual predicate for that FARA violation, then it should not have been mentioned at all as a potential ‘benefit'” Judge Sullivan said.
Judge Sullivan asked Sidney Powell if she wanted to withdraw Flynn’s guilty plea. Powell declined to answer but she said that she wants the entire case thrown out for “egregious” misconduct.
Interestingly, Brandon Van Grack, who was one of Mueller’s lawyers on Flynn’s case, said to Judge Sullivan on Tuesday that prosecutors will “refile” their sentencing memo on Flynn.
“This (refiling the memo) suggests that they are no longer going to recommend only probation if Flynn sticks to his plea…Ups the stakes considerably,” said Attorney Will Chamberlain who attended Tuesday’s hearing.
 

d0uche_n0zzle

**Negative_Creep**
Why, in the year 2019, is the FBI not using video recordings of their interviews?
 
Top