TSA says woman has ‘cute figure,’ asks for three body scans

Party Rooster

Unleash The Beast
Apr 27, 2005
40,284
7,454
438
The Inland Empire State
#1

TSA says woman has ‘cute figure,’ asks for three body scans

By David Edwards
Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:29 EST

The Transportaion and Security Administration (TSA) is coming under fire for allegedly doing “peep show” naked body scans of women who agents think are attractive.

Ellen Terrell told CBS 11 in Dallas that agents at DFW International Airport asked her to go through the invasive scanner three times because “[t]hey wanted a nice good look.”

A female agent at the checkpoint surprised Terrell by asking, “Do you play tennis?”

“And I said, ‘Why?’ She said, ‘You just have such a cute figure,’” the Texan recalled.

Speaking to agents viewing the scans in another room, the female agent claimed the images had been “blurry” and asked Terrell to go through a second and third time.

But after the third scan, the female agent appeared to get frustrated as she radioed her co-workers.

“She’s talking into her microphone and she says, ‘Guys, it is not blurry, I’m letting her go. Come on out,’” Terrell said.

While only female agents are allowed to pat down female travelers, the agency does allow male agents to view body scans of females.

After looking at over 500 TSA complaints, CBS 11 found a pattern of possible sexual harassment of female passengers.


“I feel I was targeted by the TSA employee to go through the see-you-naked machine because I am a semi-attractive female,” one woman wrote.

“TSA staff ‘trolling’ the lines looking for people to pull out was unprofessional,” another accusation said. “I know he went to that room to see my naked body through the machine with the other guy.”

“When I looked around, I saw that there were only women that were ‘told’ to go through this machine. There were no men,” one complaint noted.

This comment seemed to sum up most of the women’s charges: “Making American citizens unwilling victims of a peep show by TSA employees using full body imaging devices is an over-the-top invasion of privacy to which I strenuously object.”

In a statement, the TSA said that any person could opt-out of the body scanner by requesting a pat-down.

“TSA does not profile passengers,” the agency insisted. “All of our millimeter wave technology units including those in Dallas have been upgraded with additional privacy enhancements that no longer display passenger-specific images. Even prior to this upgrade, officers reviewing the images were located in a separate room and would have never seen the passenger being screened.”

A spokesperson told CBS 11 that it is against protocol to make more than two attempts at a full-body scan before requiring a pat-down.

Watch this video from CBS 11, broadcast Feb. 13, 2012.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/...tm_campaign=Feed:+TheRawStory+(The+Raw+Story)
 

mascan42

Registered User
Aug 26, 2002
19,040
5,840
848
Ronkonkoma, Long Island
#5
“I feel I was targeted by the TSA employee to go through the see-you-naked machine because I am a semi-attractive female,” one woman wrote.
Trust me, nobody's jacking off to this:
 

LiddyRules

I'm Gonna Be The Bestest Pilot In The Whole Galaxy
Jun 1, 2005
143,047
50,479
644
#7
She has an Annette O'Toole thing going on about her.
 

Party Rooster

Unleash The Beast
Apr 27, 2005
40,284
7,454
438
The Inland Empire State
#9
It's Wackbag. Trust me, somebody is currently having a fap fest because it's naked girl with a firearm.
Not to mention Rule 34.

That photo is bogus though. Real bodyscan photos look like this:


Modified: The old Advanced Imaging Technology scanner (left) and the improved version which is less invasive (right)
 

KRSOne

Registered User
Dec 8, 2011
13,127
3,031
258
Sunnydale
#11
Not to mention Rule 34.

That photo is bogus though. Real bodyscan photos look like this:


Modified: The old Advanced Imaging Technology scanner (left) and the improved version which is less invasive (right)
I have a bridge to sell you on mars if you believe that. If true it means they kept putting her through in hopes she would refuse and they could molest her.
 

KRSOne

Registered User
Dec 8, 2011
13,127
3,031
258
Sunnydale
#14
Maybe not, but I'll look at that shit really hard to see if I can imagine what her asshole smells like.
Just put naked body scanners in google image. All it takes is one photoshop click.
 

Party Rooster

Unleash The Beast
Apr 27, 2005
40,284
7,454
438
The Inland Empire State
#18
Maybe not, but I'll look at that shit really hard to see if I can imagine what her asshole smells like.
No need to really. Just put the image in MS Paint and hit 'invert colors.' (See below)

I have a bridge to sell you on mars if you believe that. If true it means they kept putting her through in hopes she would refuse and they could molest her.
You really are a fucking dumbshit. I'll bet your bugout bunker is just littered with Mars bridge stock certificates.

Those photos were a hoax. They came from a stock photo CD/website company that someone on Alex Jones' payroll created just to rile up retards like you.

HOAX: Airport Body Scanner Images Were Faked

Posted by The Mad Ape as Education, Oddities, Scams

Back on January 9th, 2010 I ran a story that appeared on a brother-in-arms site The Telecrap Urinal. It is a great blog and I suggest that all of you check it out. Anyway one story on there caught my attention so I blogged it here. It was the one about the Naked Body Scanner Images.

Faked body scan image

Well on the Telecrap Site the owner posted a follow-up comment:
I was duped. This image is a fake and I apologize to everyone. This image is based on a CGI and then it was altered by creating a negative of it.
That way when I reversed it all of the color detail was exposed. I have tried the same process with what I know to be authentic airport scans but can not duplicate the result I got here.
I contemplated removing this blog entry but decided to leave it for information purposes. As Sal would say: “This is a traction.”
So with that I decided to dig into this and have found the evidence that these photos are a hoax. I found the following on the PhotoAlto Image Bank:

CGI Girl


Now upon closer examination of two of these pictures you can see that they are close to same as the forgeries.

CGI Girl Front


CGI Girl Back

So someone went to great lengths to pull this stunt off. I wonder who? Is this just a computer geek nerd type trying to have a little humor at our expense or is it part of a nefarious disinformation campaign by NWO scum?

No way of knowing for sure but whoever it was had to spend some money to buy the photos without a watermark and had to have some great computer skills to doctor the photos to make them look like body scan images.

We can all learn a bit of a lesson with this. Be careful of what you watch, read, and listen to. You just never know. Which reminds me… Anti-NWO tallk show host, Alex Jones, still runs this fake as the real deal, even though I have heard his sidekick Jason Bermas admit they were faked. Makes me wonder about that guy sometimes!

http://www.tatumba.com/blog/archives/1369
 

KRSOne

Registered User
Dec 8, 2011
13,127
3,031
258
Sunnydale
#19
Oh yeah I'll trust tatumba.com over thedrudgereport.
 

Party Rooster

Unleash The Beast
Apr 27, 2005
40,284
7,454
438
The Inland Empire State
#20
Oh yeah I'll trust tatumba.com over thedrudgereport.
Nice job cementing your reputation as a retard. There's links in what I posted to the original sources. But that would involve actually doing your own work and forming an opinion on your own. Even a guy that works with Alex admitted they were fake as well.

There were articles about how Drudge (and other websites) got duped, some even issued retractions over it. You really are helpless.
 

Yesterdays Hero

She's better than you, Smirkalicious.
Jan 25, 2007
16,621
4,000
571
Canada. Land of the Fat.
#22
I'll ask again. When was Kirk allowed out of his Pen and into threads to stir up shit? Wasn't one of the conditions of him being let out of his 'Time Out' was he had to be kept out of general population?
 

Creasy Bear

gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
Donator
Mar 10, 2006
49,641
37,800
628
In a porn tree
#23
I'll ask again. When was Kirk allowed out of his Pen and into threads to stir up shit? Wasn't one of the conditions of him being let out of his 'Time Out' was he had to be kept out of general population?
He has sandbox privileges, and he's working his way up to the playground. We let him play on the monkey bars last week, but he fell on his head, so it was back to the see saw.