Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Party Rooster, Jun 23, 2011.
The whiny libs out here are now questioning whether the shooting was "justified." :arrrh:
Hurdling of deadly missiles to wound, maim or kill. The shooting is justified. Nobody should be expected to suffer being hit by rocks or other objects without the option of using deadly force. Early man used to fuck each other up by throwing rocks.
If they're able to jump over them, won't they avoid getting wounded by them?
Pet Bull, motherfucker!!!
and he fell dead on the mexican side of the border. win-win!!
Don't go into another mans country and start throwing rocks if you don't want to get shot.
These damn badge wearing stormtroopers are trying to implement a police state on the slaves by firing all willy nilly at unarmed citizens for what....climbing a fence? Are we just going to take the word of these uniformed thugs with a god complex that rocks were hurled at them? And all you damn yuppies are just going to accept it because you are told it is done in your best interest. Enjoy your nanny state as it continues to take away your rights as you sheeple sit blindly by and take it in the ass dry. Alex talked about this once.
See what I did there?
Hey Reuters asshole. The phrase is "shot and killed" not "shot dead." You are not announcing the death of William H. Bonney.
It's not border crosser , it's "wetback" you dimwit
so is this supposed to be an anti border patrol article or a feel good story?
Feel good story
Love watching "Border Wars" on TV
Simple, dont throw rocks dont get shot. saw a kid get hit in the eye from a long distance launch back in the ol rock war days, shit looked nasty yo.
I don't know how the fuck these assholes get jobs writing "news". They're barely literate.
they should kill all the wetbacks they can spot
a little budget cutting I like to call it
How we should be dealing with the fence jumping, rock throwing invaders.