OpieRadio Logo
Compound Media Logo
Jim Norton Logo

UN arms treaty could put U.S. gun owners in foreign sights, say critics

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by stevethrower, Jul 17, 2012.

  1. stevethrower

    stevethrower Got Sig?

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    48,007
    Likes Received:
    20,602
    Link
     
  2. d0uche_n0zzle

    d0uche_n0zzle **Negative_Creep**

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    46,519
    Likes Received:
    6,803
    I'll give you my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead hands!

    Molon Labe
     
  3. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,092
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    So the deal needs 65 countries to ratify it, but only one to kill it. Why isn't Israel telling the UN to shove this shit in the trash?
     
  4. Psychopath

    Psychopath Plata O Plomo

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    17,686
    Likes Received:
    3,346
    Why are we still part of the UN, and why the fuck are countries like Iran allowed a say in anything?
     
  5. stevethrower

    stevethrower Got Sig?

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    48,007
    Likes Received:
    20,602
    [​IMG]

    Cuz he has a really cool Members Only jacket?
     
  6. the Streif

    the Streif ¡¡¡¡sıʞunɹɹɹɹɹɹɹℲ
    Donator

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Messages:
    14,927
    Likes Received:
    5,855
    This. Fuck the U.N.

    And yes, I completely understand why the U.S. is still part of the U.N. At least that still give us a say(somewhat) and lets us know what those fucks are thinking. VMS made a post a few years ago about why it is a good idea for us to be a part of it but I can't find it. As usual, it was one of VMS' walls of text.
     
  7. MagicBob

    MagicBob Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,171
    Likes Received:
    15
    this story has been around for years... ya know what hasnt been around? The text of the treaty.

    its allllll speculation.

    What the UN has said is that its about arms trade between member nations... not some restriction on private ownership.

    of course the NRA is fear mongering about this, how else are they going to scare $ out of pockets.

    (that being said, I'm a lifetime NRA member, but they've really gone around the bend with the conspiracy theories lately).
     
  8. Josh_R

    Josh_R Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,847
    Likes Received:
    458
  9. stevethrower

    stevethrower Got Sig?

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    48,007
    Likes Received:
    20,602
  10. Mags

    Mags Edgelord
    Donator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    34,396
    Likes Received:
    11,767
    Falling skies.
     
  11. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    Anything that expands the scope of the UN in any way whatsoever should be immediately denounced and fought by everyone with respect for liberty. Or even just an ounce of common sense.
     
  12. KRSOne

    KRSOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    12,687
    Likes Received:
    2,854
  13. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,654
    Likes Received:
    18,424
    Which is why they spent years debunking every anti-Bush chain email in existence? Come on, that's pretty weak even for you.
     
  14. KRSOne

    KRSOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    12,687
    Likes Received:
    2,854
    You mean they loved the guy that started wars and increased the size of government? Shocking.

    Either way its a very low chance of a UN treaty taking guns away from people at this point in time. But this is just one of those foot in the door things.
     
  15. Josh_R

    Josh_R Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,847
    Likes Received:
    458
    How about a legal website, is that sufficiently unbiased? http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/article02/10.html
     
  16. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,186
    Likes Received:
    21,791
    There's no chance they would take away American guns. They MAY try an "assault weapon" ban like Clinton's but I seriously doubt they could get away with even that. Americans are adamant about gun ownership (rightfully so), and if you try to take them away I'm pretty certain you'd have a war on your hands.
     
  17. KRSOne

    KRSOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    12,687
    Likes Received:
    2,854
    I kinda agree. What they do is turn it into a privilege and not a right. Only in situations like Katrina will a incredibly corrupt police department actually go door to door and takes guns. But they did take them away in Chicago for 20 some years, and its a privilege in NYC to own a gun. A privilege that is reserved for the rich and famous, just the way the founders wanted it.
     
  18. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,186
    Likes Received:
    21,791
    I agree that's fucked up, and too often those infringements are not righted quickly enough, if at all. Luckily the really bad regulations are somewhat isolated in our country. In California my largest complaint is the 10 round clip :)action-sm) limit.

    See Kirk, if you don't get obnoxious with stuff like "the UN is absolutely going to take our guns" and make decent points, you'll find that a lot of people here would agree with you on certain things.
     
  19. THE FEZ MAN

    THE FEZ MAN as a matter of fact i dont have 5$

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    40,928
    Likes Received:
    8,750
  20. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,092
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    That ranks third beyond the 1-in-30 handgun rule and 10-day waiting period. The may-issue CCW rules suck too.
     
  21. whiskeyguy

    whiskeyguy PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    36,186
    Likes Received:
    21,791
    The may-issue rule is probably worse, you're absolutely right there, but I'd rather have higher magazine capacity than the ability to purchase more than one handgun in 30 days or having to wait 10 days. I think the magazine rule definitely wins if you include the configurations that are banned if a firearm has a removable magazine.

    Of course ideally none of those regulations would exist. Also admittedly the above opinion is based somewhat on my personal situation, as I'm not wealthy enough to buy multiple guns in a single month.
     
  22. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,092
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    At least there's some logic behind the 10-rd magazines. It sucks, but it also saves me a few bucks in ammo since I reach the point where I stop shooting rather than reload.

    There's zero logic behind the 1-in-30 and the 10-day wait, especially if you already own a gun. Background checks are instantaneous.
     
  23. Hate & Discontent

    Hate & Discontent Yo, homie. Is that my briefcase?

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    15,763
    Likes Received:
    1,337
    There's absolutely NO logic behind a 10 round magazine limit.
     
  24. Hack Hawk Down

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    17
    Someone believes chain emails...

    After Snopes reported that Obama was not a Muslim, Conservatives sent chain emails about Snopes, alleging the couple (the Mikkelsons) who own it are hard core Liberals (even though the guy was a registered Republican) You believed it. Most people didn't:

    "Moreover, Barbara Mikkelson is a Canadian citizen, and as such cannot vote in U.S. elections or contribute to political campaigns. In a statement to FactCheck.org, David Mikkelson said his "sole involvement in politics" is voting on election day. In 2000 he registered as a Republican, documents provided to FactCheck.org show, and in 2008 Mikkelson didn't declare a party affiliation at all. Says Mikkelson: "I've never joined a party, worked for a campaign, or donated money to a candidate" (source: FactCheck.org).
    Anyone who claims proof to the contrary needs to come out with it.
    A NOTE ON GEORGE SOROS: A later variant of this rumor alleges, without evidence, that Snopes.com is financed by liberal philanthropist and hedge fund tycoon George Soros. This is false. The website is entirely self-supporting through advertising sales."


    Read the whole thing here: http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/internet/a/snopes_exposed.htm


    Having said that, I agree that There's absolutely NO logic behind a 10 round magazine limit.
     
  25. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,092
    Likes Received:
    8,346
    It gives lawmakers something to feel good about accomplishing for the anti-gunners without diminishing any of the functionality of a given firearm.
     

Share This Page