Veterans Being Told By Obama Admin. They Can't Have Guns

ShooterMcGavin

Go back to your shanties.
May 25, 2005
18,029
1,380
643
#1
Any shenanigans behind this? Can't seriously be including physically handicapped in background checks right?


http://redflagnews.com/headlines/di...iving-or-transporting-a-firearm-or-ammunition

Written By Constitutional Attorney Michael Connelly, J.D.
How would you feel if you received a letter from the U.S. Government informing you that because of a physical or mental condition that the government says you have it is proposing to rule that you are incompetent to handle your own financial affairs? Suppose that letter also stated that the government is going to appoint a stranger to handle your affairs for you at your expense? That would certainly be scary enough but it gets worse.
What if that letter also stated: “A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”?
That makes is sound like something right from a documentary on a tyrannical dictatorship somewhere in the world. Yet, as I write this I have a copy of such a letter right in front of me. It is being sent by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to hundreds, perhaps thousands, of America’s heroes. In my capacity as Executive Director of the United States Justice Foundation (USJF) I have been contacted by some of these veterans and the stories I am getting are appalling.
The letter provides no specifics on the reasons for the proposed finding of incompetency; just that is based on a determination by someone in the VA. In every state in the United States no one can be declared incompetent to administer their own affairs without due process of law and that usually requires a judicial hearing with evidence being offered to prove to a judge that the person is indeed incompetent. This is a requirement of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that states that no person shall “… be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law…”.
Obviously, the Department of Veterans Affairs can’t be bothered by such impediments as the Constitution, particularly since they are clearly pushing to fulfill one of Obama’s main goals, the disarming of the American people. Janet Napolitano has already warned law enforcement that some of the most dangerous among us are America’s heroes, our veterans, and now according to this letter from the VA they can be prohibited from buying or even possessing a firearm because of a physical or mental disability.
Think about it, the men and women who have laid their lives on the line to defend us and our Constitution are now having their own Constitutional rights denied. There are no clear criteria for the VA to declare a veteran incompetent. It can be the loss of a limb in combat, a head injury, a diagnosis of PTSD, or even a soldier just telling someone at the VA that he or she is depressed over the loss of a buddy in combat. In none of these situations has the person been found to be a danger to themselves or others. If that was the case than all of the Americans who have suffered from PTSD following the loss of a loved one or from being in a car accident would also have to be disqualified from owning firearms. It would also mean that everyone who has ever been depressed for any reason should be disarmed. In fact, many of the veterans being deprived of their rights have no idea why it is happening.
The answer seems to be it is simply because they are veterans. At the USJF we intend to find the truth by filing a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of Veterans Affairs to force them to disclose the criteria they are using to place veterans on the background check list that keeps them from exercising their Second Amendment rights. Then we will take whatever legal steps are necessary to protect our American warriors.
The reality is that Obama will not get all of the gun control measures he wants through Congress, and they wouldn’t be enough for him anyway. He wants a totally disarmed America so there will be no resistance to his plans to rob us of our nation. That means we have to ask who will be next. If you are receiving a Social Security check will you get one of these letters? Will the government declare that you are incompetent because of your age and therefore banned from firearm ownership. It certainly fits in with the philosophy and plans of the Obama administration. It is also certain that our military veterans don’t deserve this and neither do any other Americans.
-- Michael Connelly, J.D.
Executive Director, United States Justice Foundation
Follow Us: @redflagnews on Twitter
Get the RedFlag app today for Apple and Android devices...


 

OilyJillFart

Well-Lubed Member
Sep 26, 2008
2,869
1,137
433
#6
Well, that's one way to cure mental illness, just make it known you will carry that scarlet letter forever and forfeit a shitload of rights if you admit you have symptoms.
 

d0uche_n0zzle

**Negative_Creep**
Sep 15, 2004
46,713
6,877
693
F.U.B.A.R
#7
According to some studies; everyone is nuts. Some a wee bit more then others.
 

gleet

What's black and white and red all over?
Jul 24, 2005
22,543
13,852
608
Idaho
#8
Keep pushing motherfuckers. Keep pushing.
 

KRSOne

Registered User
Dec 8, 2011
13,017
2,985
258
Sunnydale
#9
According to some studies; everyone is nuts. Some a wee bit more then others.
And a majority of those nuts join the state so they can take your guns.

49% of active duty troops and vets did vote for Obama.
 
Dec 25, 2005
10,005
172
513
NJ
#12
I'll take the unpopular angle here.. what about those with real PTSD issues and others like that? Doesn't matter if they're a vet or not, the condition is the same really.
 

whiskeyguy

PR representative for Drunk Whiskeyguy.
Donator
Jan 12, 2010
36,420
22,054
398
Northern California
#13
I'll take the unpopular angle here.. what about those with real PTSD issues and others like that? Doesn't matter if they're a vet or not, the condition is the same really.
What about them? How many of those with ptsd have murdered people? I can think of one recently.

You'll never remove all dangers in life, and I'd personally rather keep my rights (and defend those of vets) than punish an entire group for the actions a minority of them might commit.
 
Dec 25, 2005
10,005
172
513
NJ
#14
I'm not agreeing that all vets should not have guns. That's bullshit.