OpieRadio Logo
Compound Media Logo
Jim Norton Logo

Warren Buffet Chain Letter

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Voss's Tumor, Oct 30, 2011.

  1. Voss's Tumor

    Voss's Tumor Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    15,516
    Likes Received:
    4
    http://blogs.wsj.com/totalreturn/2011/10/28/the-warren-buffett-chain-letter/

    A guy just posted it on Facebook so I looked it up. It's actually not a bad idea, whoever put the whole thing together.

    Idealistic and slim to no chance of success? Sure, but I love the concept.
     
  2. Motor Head

    Motor Head HIGHWAY TRASH REMOVAL

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    10,385
    Likes Received:
    435
    Of course the adoption of these new rules will be voted down in Congress. The gravy train has biscuit wheels and nobody wants to get off that.
     
  3. Josh_R

    Josh_R Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,847
    Likes Received:
    458
    Many of these new rules are in response to fallacies or really old practices.


    1. There is not "tenure" in Congress, they have to be reelected to come back, no matter how long they have served. Congress has a pension program just like most other federal employees. It isn't really fair that if a Congressman serves faithfully and is reelected by his constituents for 20 years, to tell him that he cannot retire and that he has to pack up his shit and leave with nothing; unless you are willing to tell every other federal employee (including the military) the same thing.

    2. Congress has contributed to Social Security since 1984.This rule would also be highly unfair. To take all the funds from the congressional retirement fund and give them to Social Security would be like telling you that you have to dump your 401k and the ONLY retirement funds you can have are those from Social Security (which would either bankrupt the country or leave shitloads of people in poverty). http://www.snopes.com/politics/socialsecurity/pensions.asp

    3. What's the difference in allowing Congress to "purchase their own retirement" out of their own paycheck and allowing Congressmen to pay into a group Congressional Retirement Fund? See rule 2 which does away with the congressional retirement fund.

    4. Congressional pay has actually only risen by an average of $3800 per year in the last 30 years, which is already pretty close to 3% per year ($3800/ $114000 = .0333 * 100 = 3%) http://www.thecapitol.net/FAQ/payandperqs.htm

    5. This rule is also pretty much nonsense. Most Americans receive their health insurance from their employers and they pay a portion of the premium every month. We are Congress' employers and Congress pays a portion of their own health insurance costs as well (about 15%). http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/health-care-for-members-of-congress/

    6. I don't know what all these laws are that Congress imposes on the American people that they are exempt from. Since the passage of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, Congress really isn't exempt from any laws.

    7. This is basically just saying that all retired Congressmen would lose their health insurance and pensions. No one in their right mind would insist that some old ass congressman that served his country honorable should just lose his retirement and health insurance.

    This list is mostly a response to a bunch of fallacies and straw men. This isn't a third world country where law makers never follow the law and give themselves ridiculously lavish benefits.
     
  4. Voss's Tumor

    Voss's Tumor Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    15,516
    Likes Received:
    4
    I think the idea is more about making congressional service a service rather than the reward at the end of a career. Let's face it, most congressmen and senators live pretty lavish lives off the tax-payers, and they're usually career politicians who don't know shit about shit except how to get elected.
     
  5. Voss's Tumor

    Voss's Tumor Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    15,516
    Likes Received:
    4
    But yeah, I didn't fact check it or really even give a shit about the rules themselves. I was more posting it as an interesting thing that's going around.
     
  6. CousinDave

    CousinDave Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    25,297
    Likes Received:
    198

    The ones who are already rich do, but for the ones who don't come from money they live a rather modest life, especially if they have a family. Maintaining two households with one being in one of the most expensive real estate markets in the country is very difficult on $175k a year and if you want to send you kids to a decent school in the DC area, better hope the wife makes a decent amount of money.

    This is why there are so many millionaires in the Congress, nobody else can really afford the job, but at the same time they can't cry about $175k a year as that's more than 2X what most people make, of course most people don't have to pay beltway cost of living.



    I think in this day and age members of Congress don't need to be in DC, they can vote electronically, committee meetings can be held online, etc...

    That would sure make lobbying a lot more difficult - 535 members of Congress spread out over the entire country vs. all of them in one place at the same time.
     
  7. Don the Radio Guy

    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    69,628
    Likes Received:
    5,082
    I can only imagine the level of corruption that would stem from electronic voting.
     
  8. Josh_R

    Josh_R Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,847
    Likes Received:
    458
    And all you have to do is vote them out...
    I am actually related to my Congressional Rep by marriage. I can't say that I actually know her, but from what I know of her, she is a normal local girl. She did not come from money and she just worked her way up from local government up to U.S. Congress. I also saw her doing her own grocery shopping at the local Giant Eagle supermarket. I think the idea that most reps and senators live lavishly off the taxpayer is somewhat exaggerated. Of course you have some like Pelosi who use Air Force jets to fly home all the time and run up huge tabs. I would imagine that most of the representatives that we consider to be rich were already that way before they came to congress, and those that get rich in office are probably capitalizing on their fame more than they are receiving money from us.
     
  9. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    First off, the "deficit of 3% of GDP" is not a number he came up with. It's the deficit limit used by Euro Zone countries. And it's not working, because 3% of GDP every year adds up like a motherfucker.

    Second, government doesn't work the way the market does. Most politicians are not in it for their fucking salary. They're in it for the power, which is worth much more than their salaries and pensions. So that incentive wouldn't work. A constitutional amendment on the other hand would.
     
  10. Motor Head

    Motor Head HIGHWAY TRASH REMOVAL

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    10,385
    Likes Received:
    435
    How many years to get a Congressional pension? 20-30 years?

    Nope, 6 years. The civil servant in me envies anybody that can get a nice fat pension after putting 6 whole years in. Sorry, but I have to work 3 times that long to qualify for a 50% pension and a shitty health plan. I do agree with Josh though, throw the bums out if they are apart of the problem and not the solution. Ah what do I know, just another hamhead state employee.
     
  11. NuttyJim

    NuttyJim Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    13,731
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    You get to be a complete piece of shit for 2 terms and get all that. A Junior Senator makes in the neighborhood of $120,000+ a year w/o benefits. Definitely need term limits. And if you wanna work for and represent the people so badly, then take a salary and benefit cut.
     

Share This Page