OpieRadio Logo
Compound Media Logo
Jim Norton Logo

What type of argument is valid? One based in facts or one based in emotion?

Discussion in 'Classic Opie & Anthony General Discussion' started by SOS, Feb 13, 2013.

  1. SOS

    SOS ONA
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2000
    Messages:
    47,925
    Likes Received:
    8,825
    What type of argument is valid? One based in cold hard facts or one based in appeals to emotion?
     
  2. ruckstande

    ruckstande Posts mostly from the shitter.

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,656
    Likes Received:
    4,225
    Whichever one the President tells us is valid.
     
  3. Ballbuster1

    Ballbuster1 In The Danger Zone...
    Wackbag Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    101,962
    Likes Received:
    16,338
    Obviously facts are the most valid but they use
    emotion to push agendas that the facts don't support.

    Everybody loves children and puppies.
     
  4. samurai

    samurai Ridiculum Anserini

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    20,593
    Likes Received:
    4,112
    Given the fact that we are 'Baggers...


    ...Ad Hominem.
     
  5. Pigdango

    Pigdango Silence, you mortal Fuck!
    Donator

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    75,208
    Likes Received:
    48,628
    Every argument is based on emotion once something is agreed upon as fact. So I'd say arguments based on emotion are more valid.
     
  6. oldmandick

    oldmandick My Button is Bigger Than Your Button!
    Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    12,516
    Likes Received:
    2,431
    Nothing beats emotional facts.
     
  7. BIV

    BIV I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    77,718
    Likes Received:
    27,098
    Facts if you are a man, emotion if you are a woman or a liberal...which is pretty much the same thing.
     
  8. Rash Rendering

    Rash Rendering Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,354
    Likes Received:
    222
    The "or I'll beat the piss outta you" argument works well on children
     
  9. Creasy Bear

    Creasy Bear gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    47,653
    Likes Received:
    35,426
    Nothing is more valid than my emotion-based arguments... and if you don't accept that, you're worse than Hitler.
     
  10. Rash Rendering

    Rash Rendering Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,354
    Likes Received:
    222
    Ad hominem arguments are for cunts
     
    Josh_R likes this.
  11. d0uche_n0zzle

    d0uche_n0zzle **Negative_Creep**

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    46,483
    Likes Received:
    6,782
    Debate like Spock. Leave the emotions to the bitches.
     
    Mags likes this.
  12. rockpup

    rockpup Sick Puppy

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,047
    Likes Received:
    878
    Yay! *wags tail*
     
  13. MayrMeninoCrash

    MayrMeninoCrash Liberal Psycopath

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    24,065
    Likes Received:
    8,333
    I prefer arguments full of hearsay and conjecture.
     
  14. BIV

    BIV I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    77,718
    Likes Received:
    27,098
    So you are part of the clergy?
     
  15. countryblumpkin

    countryblumpkin team derosa

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,526
    Likes Received:
    975
    nothing better than hacky conservative jokes.

    well,except them hanging themselves...
     
  16. stellarcomics

    stellarcomics Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    6,934
    Likes Received:
    1,539
    Almost every argument based in emotion is horseshit. In business you never make a decision based on how you feel, you go with the facts and maybe a touch of intuition. Why would you treat your personal life any differently?
     
  17. Party Rooster

    Party Rooster Unleash The Beast

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,304
    Likes Received:
    7,462
    Both. A good lawyer will get his client off by playing to the emotions of the jury when the facts are muddled enough.
     
    oldmandick likes this.
  18. BIV

    BIV I'm Biv Dick Black, the Over Poster.

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    77,718
    Likes Received:
    27,098
    Get it right. It's not a hack joke, it's a stereotype. And as we all know, all stereotypes are based in truth.
     
  19. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    The one based in fact. But you still need to properly define a fact, before that statement means anything of substance. Ohterwise, you'll just have people like fandango86 tell you that a fact is just something everyone agrees about. Like this:
    But he's wrong. In reality, a fact is a statement about reality, established using direct observation of reality and logic. Whether anyone (or everyone) agrees with it or not is irrelevant.

    P.S. You might also want to define "based", for the retarded portion of the audience: "based in A" means that it can be deduced from A using the rules of logic.
     
  20. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    The question was about valid arguments, not arguments that will work if the jury is incapable of differentiating between valid and invalid arguments.
    Well sure, it is "almost", because emotions are a part of reality. So yeah, if the topic of the conversation is emotions, then an argument might be based on someone observing those emotions and making a statement about them. For instance: I'm feeling sad because my mother's plane crashed, therefor I'm not a psychopath. Logical conclusion, and it's technically based on an emotion.

    The problems start when someone starts observing emotions to make statements about minimum wage or the laws of physics. Then they're making an error, because they're not using logic to draw conclusions from their observation of reality. "people with no skills making 8 bucks an hour is wrong" is not the logical consequence of "I feel sad because people with no skills are making 8 bucks an hour", just as "it's wrong for a plane to crash when it runs out of fuel" is not the logical consequence of "I feel sad when a plane crashes". In fact, it is RIGHT that a plane crashes if it runs out of fuel, and it is RIGHT that someone with no skills makes very little money. It's Physics and Economics, both logical systems of thought based on the observation of reality.
     
    #20 Norm Stansfield, Feb 13, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2013
  21. Party Rooster

    Party Rooster Unleash The Beast

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,304
    Likes Received:
    7,462
    So you're saying conservatives only use facts and logic when arguing for bans on gay marriage, teaching Intelligent Design, or stem cell research? :confused:
    It's valid if it gets his client off.
     
    MayrMeninoCrash likes this.
  22. Norm Stansfield

    Norm Stansfield 私は亀が好きだ。

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,949
    Likes Received:
    4,077
    The purpose of a criminal trial is to establish guilt or innocence, not to randomly assign guilt or innocence based on our feelings.

    So no, whether it gets his client off or not, emotional arguments are not valid. As whoever gets raped and murdered next by the freshly acquitted client will no doubt soon find out.
     
    #22 Norm Stansfield, Feb 13, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2013
  23. Party Rooster

    Party Rooster Unleash The Beast

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,304
    Likes Received:
    7,462
    Maybe they were asking for it?
     
  24. SatansCheerledr

    SatansCheerledr Ideologically Unsound

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    14,827
    Likes Received:
    7,405
    Emotion=Argument.

    Facts=Debate.
     
    Party Rooster likes this.
  25. Neon

    Neon ネオン
    Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    51,651
    Likes Received:
    18,420
    Depends on the argument. In certain situations emotions are irrelevant, and in others facts are irrelevant.

    For example, if someone calls your mother a whore and you kill him, the great emotional distress he caused you is irrelevant because even if he insulted you, you still can't kill him.

    Conversely, cheating on your wife is totally legal, but most people would think you were an asshole for doing it based purely on emotions. The fact that you broke no laws is irrelevant.
     

Share This Page