Discussion in 'Current Events' started by BIV, Aug 6, 2013.
I assume he's planning on not charging people to use the bus anymore, then? Because if it's a right, you shouldn't be taking their money for it.
More importantly, why is it a right to travel to my neighborhood?
Why does a highway act have non-discrimination provisions?
Because the cunt federal government is made up of a bunch of cunts.
They take money from citizens, and then in order to get it back the states have to abide by all sorts of regulations that have little or nothing to do with the projects that money funds.
What has happened to make this rule? Certainly anyone law abiding should be able to ride the bus.
If the highway was built or funded by the federal government, then it's unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment to restrict the use of that highway to certain groups.
i don't get what the problem is
Just to expand further-
42 USC § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation
(a) Equal access
All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
(b) Establishments affecting interstate commerce or supported in their activities by State action as places of public accommodation; lodgings; facilities principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises; gasoline stations; places of exhibition or entertainment; other covered establishments
Each of the following establishments which serves the public is a place of public accommodation within the meaning of this subchapter if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action:
(1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence;
(2) any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises, including, but not limited to, any such facility located on the premises of any retail establishment; or any gasoline station;
(3) any motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium or other place of exhibition or entertainment; and
(4) any establishment
(i) which is physically located within the premises of any establishment otherwise covered by this subsection, or
(ii) within the premises of which is physically located any such covered establishment, and
(B) which holds itself out as serving patrons of such covered establishment.
Finally, fuck all those assholes that told me all my life a driver license wasn't a right.
It was worth a shot.
Aww, they're suing because Beavercreek won't let them turn it into another Chicago...or Detroit...Or Cincinnati, or downtown Dayton, or Baltimore, D.C., should I go on?
2 hours ago
RTA=Road To Africa
So riding a bus is a 'Black Thing' now? Not liking loud, polluting, crime raising bus lines into your town is now racist?
34 minutes ago
The Feds tried this with BART (subway system in San Francisco). They need a connector from their station to Oakland Airport, about 3-4 miles away. They developed a cable car type train to shuttle people between the two. The neighborhood (while it isn't the worst, it's still Oakland, and has the expected type of residents) demanded a stop halfway between the station and the airport. Feds withheld funding until BART redesigned the line to accommodate an intermediate station. BART told the Feds to fuck off, and proceeded to build the project without Federal involvement. Now the enners can watch all the fancy white people passing overhead in their brand new mass transit system.
That could have made sense for other reasons... like the added expense, congestion, and delays the additional stop would have incurred would make it less efficient.
Who am I kidding? It was probably because of the blacks.
They can. Deliberately misleading racebaiting headline is deliberately misleading and racebaiting. Read the article.
The last half of the article is all about race......
and I was making more of a joke than anything.
So? That doesn't make the headline any less misleading.
White Ohio Suburb of Beavercreek Fights to Keep Black Bus Riders Out of Neighborhood, Claims Some Local Watchdog Group
That's a wee bit more accurate, no?
No, your right. No basis at all.
Have all buses 'monitored' by armed citizens. Hence, the angry Negroes won't be riding it after a few body drops, yo.
That's how it's supposed to work in the pants-pissing liberal world of butterflies and gumdrops.
Here's how it works in the real world...
The real opportunities extended bus routes offer to minorities(blacks) is the opportunity for them(blacks) to bring their thuggery and mayhem to fertile (white)hunting grounds and hurt (white)business.
This is just another example of white communities being forced to subject themselves to black violence... because any white person who refuses to play the victim is clearly a racist.
I have never seen a heated/cooled bus shelter before... like would you want to be in a shelter with a door on it?
Beaver Creek, Colorado.
The bus shelters are like tanning salons.
Whitey deserves no less, and blackie don't ski.
Gathering the only people taking the bus there are the "help" anyway...
In some neighborhoods a climate controlled bus shelter would become a homeless shelter.