Discussion in 'Current Events' started by BIV, Jul 13, 2011.
Savages acting like Savages. Nothing new here.
But these are peaceful revolutionaries! Free Libya!
You don't know how right you are. It's a tactic that's been used throughout history.
Nothing ever bad happens during civil wars.
Obama is the best, we spend hundreds of billions to fight AQ in Afghanistan and then we spend billions to help them in Libya.
Some people have such a prissy, sheltered, idealized view of reality it's embarrassing. Food's gone, millions are starving, Gaddafi has rerouted the sewage into the water supply, and any living soul seen walking on the street gets hit by a sniper bullet. "But they're looting the surrounding villages!" lol.
I'm pretty sure some Torries weren't treated with kid gloves during the Revolutionary War.
Next you're going to tell me that the rebel advancement isn't due to a series of Scrabble victories.
You can take the North Africans out of Africa, but you can't take the Africa out of the North Africans...
You're a retarded college puke. Please keep your opinions about others to yourself. There's nothing prissy about expecting American allies to not **** and murder civilians without any repercussions. It's very reasonable.
It's funny how easily you are duped by Qadhafi. Because he is the one making that claim. See, if AQ are in with the Libyan rebels, then the US won't help them. I still think the Libyan rebels are not worth helping, but I highly doubt AQ is involved there. They have no reason to. Easier to wait for the dust to settle and then decide what to do.
They must have just gotten word about the Canucks losing.
The rebels are not officially Al Qaeda, but they have all kinds of direct links to Al Qaeda, and many of them clearly have American blood on their hands. There's really no denying that, the evidence is overwhelming.
For instance one rebel leader (Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi) was captured in the war on terror, in Peshawar, in 2002, and handed over to the US (and then passed on to Lybia, where he was recently freed). He also openly admitted to recruiting fighters who fought for Al Qaeda in Iraq.
There are plenty of other well documented and sourced articles, from reputable publications, about Jihadis among the rebels, and Al Qaeda and Hezbollah involvement in Libya.
I was talking about an official, organizational support for the Libyan rebels from AQ. Obviously there are plenty of recurring names and whatnot. Not all of AQ are idealists. There's plenty of mercenaries there as well.
We can't even get them to admit to a relationship with the Taliban and you expect them to hold a presser announcing "official" organizational support for Libyan rebels?
Al Qaeda may already be among Libya's rebels
Are Libyan rebels an al-Qaeda stalking horse?
This is a moot point, because I actually agree with you that we shouldn't be helping the Libyan rebels, but my point was that it is unclear. There are plenty of conflicting reports that I see on this. But whatever. I say fuck 'em.
Unclear? That would be like FDR helping a large group of unknown Germans that may or may not be Nazis.
Exactly. Stop arguing, dummy. I'm agreeing with you. The only thing I said was that no one was sure if AQ was involved or not. I think that is good enough to not help them.
Since she's from Nigeria, I'd say the rapist probably got the worse part of the deal.
Who would want to **** a ******? Ew!
Having to put on a condom while trying to **** a bitch would really suck.